• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Who achieved the most and the least of the Fellowship?

Radaghast

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2021
Messages
2,810
In Unfinished Tales, in an essay titled "The Elessar", Tolkien wrote that "Legolas probably achieved least of the Nine Walkers." The full paragraph is quoted below:
Elendil and Gil-Galad were partners; but this was "the Last Alliance" of Elves and Men. In Sauron's final overthrow, Elves were not effectively concerned at the point of action. Legolas probably achieved least of the Nine Walkers. Galadriel, the greatest of the Eldar surviving in Middle-earth, was potent mainly in wisdom and goodness, as a director or counsellor in the struggle, unconquerable in resistance (especially in mind and spirit) but incapable of punitive action. In her scale she had become like Manwë with regard to the greater total action. Manwë, however, even after the Downfall of Númenor and the breaking of the old world, even in the Third Age when the Blessed Realm had been removed from the "Circles of the World," was still not a mere observer. It is clearly from Valinor that the emissaries came who were called the Istari (or Wizards), and among them Gandalf, who proved to be the director and coordinator both attack and defence.
I first thought the line seemed a non-sequitur but now that I reread it it's in the midst of Tolkien making a point about the relative "non-involvement" of the elves in Middle-earth towards the end of the Third Age. It almost seems like Tolkien is suggesting Legolas was purposely holding back from acting, which strikes me as curious.

Anyway, that's not the point of this post. As per the title it's to ask who did the most of the Fellowship and who did the least. A question on Quora asks if it's Pippin, which I don't think is the case. But I'm curious to see what others think.
 
Ah, my dear @Radaghast - here you ask a(nother) question with nearly infinite dimension.
Each must now define "achievement" for themselves and by and compared to what it is determined - followed by what "most" means with relation to their particular definition of "achievement" - and then "least" with relation to the same.
Ent refrains from any other comment upon the matter for some time, if ever at all. The matter is just too great for him. And the yardsticks to be used for measurement too diverse.
 
Upon consultation with our supermod, it looks like a poll would have to be either"most" or "least". As it stands now, it's a "question" thread, which is fine.

Which reminds me: the up/down markers at the bottom of each post allows you to vote for the best answer. 😊
 
As for least, I'm tempted to say Boromir; he was doomed from the start, though it becomes clear only in retrospect. As I mentioned in my little essay on the "Rule of Threes", he sounds his horn three times, all without effect: "No help came, only more orcs". The symbolism is obvious, especially in contrast to the Horn of Rohan.

On the other hand, his fall did "achieve" the answer to the dilemma of which direction the Ring would take, and who would go.
 
“The least” - yes, Legolas. But he was only a Wood Elf, nowhere near the level of Galadriel or Elrond.

Well Legoas did in fact save the fellowship, or more specifically Frodo, when he smote a stalking fell beast along the Andiun. Just food for thought…

They all achieved so much in their own rights. I think a fairer question on this topic would be “who could the Fellowship have not done without?”
 
Pax to Tolkien but I think this is unanswerable.
Each character had a doom ("doom" as in "destiny", not destruction/death) and roles were neither identical nor equal.
Kind of like a puzzle: all pieces interlock, but they are not the same size or shape, or bear the same [partial] image.
Yet all are needed to make a whole and comprehensible picture.
 
In Unfinished Tales, in an essay titled "The Elessar", Tolkien wrote that "Legolas probably achieved least of the Nine Walkers." The full paragraph is quoted below:

I first thought the line seemed a non-sequitur but now that I reread it it's in the midst of Tolkien making a point about the relative "non-involvement" of the elves in Middle-earth towards the end of the Third Age. It almost seems like Tolkien is suggesting Legolas was purposely holding back from acting, which strikes me as curious.

Anyway, that's not the point of this post. As per the title it's to ask who did the most of the Fellowship and who did the least. A question on Quora asks if it's Pippin, which I don't think is the case. But I'm curious to see what others think.
Well least is easy, Boromir, he died. He didn't do nothing as he was the direct cause of Frodo leaving the fellowship, which inevitably lead to the destruction of the ring, but he didn't himself do anything of grand achievement to forward the effort of Sauron's destruction.

Most is a little more complicated, I would argue Sam and Frodo (Lets be honest, it was all Sam) as the top contenders as, if defining the largest achievement as most impactful act, they were the ones who journeyed into Mordor, passed through Gorgoroth, and climbed Mount Doom, but an argument could be made for other members of the fellowship. As much as it pains me, I would cast aside both Legolas and Gimli as options. Merry and Pippin both make incredible achievement's in the war, thought I think Pippin did more. Merry did stab The Witch King with a Barrow-blade which is what I would contribute as the reason he was defeated by Eowyn, but if it wasn't for Pippin lighting the Beacons to call Rohan to Gondor's aid, Merry and Eowyn would have never arrived and Gondor surely would have been lost to the armies of Mordor. Though I don't believe either made as great achievements as Aragorn or Gandalf, who are I think of as the only two in equal contest to the Sam and Frodo, though Gandalf more.

Aragorn as a direct and major contributing factor in almost every victory outside of the hobbit's trek to Mordor. His rise to his destiny and the return of Isildur's Heir inspired many men to not give up hope. He encouraged Legolas and Gimli to continue the fighting effort and to go after Merry and Pippin. He gathered the Dead Men of Dunharrow to aid them in their fight against Mordor, which is was instrumental in the war. He did this and so much more (I honestly am to lazy to keep finding stuff) to aid the effort.

As for Gandalf, without him none of this would have happened. Gandalf discovered that the ring was in the shire, he sent Frodo to Rivendell, he killed the Balrog, he gave Théoden hope to fight once more, he was of great aid in The Battle of Helm's Deep, he sent the Eagles to rescue the hobbits atop Mount Doom, and so much more.

I think every member of the fellowship were instrumental in the fight against Sauron, though some more than others. An argument can be made for any of them (Maybe not Boromir). It's all up to how you define an achievement and how you interpret the story.
 
Most is a little more complicated, I would argue Sam and Frodo (Lets be honest, it was all Sam) as the top contenders as, if defining the largest achievement as most impactful act, they were the ones who journeyed into Mordor, passed through Gorgoroth, and climbed Mount Doom, but an argument could be made for other members of the fellowship. As much as it pains me, I would cast aside both Legolas and Gimli as options. Merry and Pippin both make incredible achievement's in the war, thought I think Pippin did more. Merry did stab The Witch King with a Barrow-blade which is what I would contribute as the reason he was defeated by Eowyn, but if it wasn't for Pippin lighting the Beacons to call Rohan to Gondor's aid, Merry and Eowyn would have never arrived and Gondor surely would have been lost to the armies of Mordor. Though I don't believe either made as great achievements as Aragorn or Gandalf, who are I think of as the only two in equal contest to the Sam and Frodo, though Gandalf more.
All Sam, eh? I wonder how Sam would've done without Gollum and without Frodo keeping him in check and "taming" him? 🤔
 
The real hero is me, Annatar. Sauron, that is. Without me, the others would have been pretty much screwed. So I just said, okay, now cast that ring into that fire, so there's peace and quiet and all that. But Frodo didn't want to, he suddenly got all weird. So I said: Okay, let it go, now it's time to resign and so on. So I retired and went east to the beach. But somehow they didn't quite understand that in the West, they were so fanatical and then massacred all those poor orcs. Yes, I thought that was a bit of a shame, but what can you do? To be honest, those nasty orcs really annoyed me too, especially because they never showered. And after all, I was already in well-deserved retirement, so please leave me alone now...
 
Pippin is pretty useless in my opinion, but the answers to this question are going to be based on opinion, so....
I think that Frodo probably did the "most" in the sense that he carried the One Ring for as long as he did, but Sam is probably a close second (if not equal).
If Pippin hadn't accidentally awoken the balrog, then Gandalf wouldn't have fought it, and Gandalf wouldn't have become Gandalf the White, and then all of Middle Earth would be in biiiiig trouble. So technically Pippin saved all of Middle Earth.
(Either way, I'm glad to see that you're back)
 
Last edited:

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top