In this matter, we are in total agreement!ithrynluin said:
You can't get much more authoritative than Gandalf.from The Return of the King, Chapter 5, The Steward and the King,And Gandalf said: "...This is your realm, and the heart of the greater realm that shall be. The Third Age of the world is ended, and the new age is begun; and it is your task to order its beginning and to preserve what may be preserved. For though much has been saved, much must now pass away; and the power of the Three Rings also is ended, all the lands that you see, and those that lie round about them, shall be dwellings of Men. For the time comes of the Dominion of Men, and the Elder Kindred shall fade or depart..."
ithrynluin said:Provide one example where one of the Three is used for a 'violent' purpose. There is none, because the Elven rings were made to preserve, not destroy.
As for Nenya still having some power, I don't think that's correct.
We can infer from this passage that the days were sunny.
Another sunny day!
There is no mention here that they began their road home 'in the early before dawn' as you say. Because the mist was gathering does not mean it could not have been sunny at the same time. Therefore, I don't think this is any proof of the Three still being 'functional'. Besides, we have proof enough in the books, where we are told that if the One was destroyed, the Three too would fade and lose their powers.
I just disagree with your assertion. My prior quote from Gandalf (who bears one of the Rings) is absolute. He states that, "...and the Power of the Three Rings also is ended..."Anárion said:immediatly immediatly
OK, so maybe it was a bit sunny, I guess my memory served me wrong and the whole mist thing corrupted my thinking. Perhaps you are correct though, because as the Nazgûl fell immediately after the One Ring was destroyed I'm thinking that maybe the Elvish Rings immediately went out of power and were then just cool looking rings. However, since the Elves (and Istari) bearing the rings were not tied to the One Ring in a physical/mental sense maybe their rings did take some time to fade, quickly in Elvish eyes but a seemingly long time to a mortal man.
Just two possible outcomes.
It is my opinion (which I feel is fully supported by the text) that the moment the Ruling Ring was unmade, power immediately faded from all the other Rings of Power.from The Silmarillion, Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age,
"...But Sauron could not discover them, for they were given into the hands of the Wise, who concealed them and never again used them openly while Sauron kept the Ruling Ring. Therefore the Three remained unsullied, for they were forged by Celebrimbor alone, and the hand of Sauron had never touched them; yet they also were subject to the One."
from The Silmarillion said:"...But Sauron could not discover them, for they were given into the hands of the Wise, who concealed them and never again used them openly while Sauron kept the Ruling Ring. Therefore the Three remained unsullied, for they were forged by Celebrimbor alone, and the hand of Sauron had never touched them; yet they also were subject to the One."
The key words in the quote you cited are, "...while Sauron kept the Ruling Ring." The words used openly would more than likely be equated to the "wielded". The Elven Rings were used for preservation. As long as they weren't destroyed (or the Ruling Ring destroyed), the work they had already performed would not be undone... but they could not be used openly (wielded) to do additional works, etc.Anárion said:So does this statement mean they could use them subtley then? For if they could then they would be able to use their rings. It says also in The Rings of Power, that as soon as Sauron slipped on the Ruling Ring, the Elves were immediatly aware of it. So, they could then know when he had his Ring on, and whenever he had his on they wouldnt put theirs on but when he didnt have the One Ring on, could they wear theirs, and a "subtle way"?
Ah, finally something that I may comment on, for you all have done a wonderous job in the debate of this topic.Anárion said:So does this statement mean they could use them subtley then? For if they could then they would be able to use their rings. It says also in The Rings of Power, that as soon as Sauron slipped on the Ruling Ring, the Elves were immediatly aware of it. So, they could then know when he had his Ring on, and whenever he had his on they wouldnt put theirs on but when he didnt have the One Ring on, could they wear theirs, and a "subtle way"?
Valaquenta said:Therefore Ilúvatar gave to their vision Being, and set it amid the Void, and the Secret Fire was sent to burn at the heart of the World; and it was called Eä.
This would imply that during his entire stay in Numenor, the Ruling Ring was off of his finger and safely kept in Barad-dur somewhere.and though he was robbed now of that shape in which he had wrought so great an evil, so that he could never again appear fair to the eyes of Men, yet his spirit arose out of the deep and passed as a shadow and a black wind over the sea, and came back to Middle-earth and to Mordor that was his home. There he took up again his great Ring in Barad-dûr, and dwelt there, dark and silent, until he wrought himself a new guise, an image of malice and hatred made visible; and the Eye of Sauron the Terrible few could endure.
From Letter 211:This would imply that during his entire stay in Numenor, the Ruling Ring was off of his finger and safely kept in Barad-dur somewhere.
That would seem to be that.Ar-Pharazôn, as is told in the ‘Downfall’ or Akallabêth, conquered a terrified Sauron’s subjects, not Sauron. Sauron’s personal ‘surrender’ was voluntary and cunning: he got free transport to Numenor! He naturally had the One Ring, and so very soon dominated the minds and wills of most of the Númenóreans. (I do not think Ar-Pharazôn knew anything about the One Ring. The Elves kept the matter of the Rings very secret, as long as they could. In any case Ar-Pharazôn was not in communication with them. In the Tale of Years III p. 364 you will find hints of the trouble: ‘the Shadow falls on Númenor’. After Tar-Atanamir (an Elvish name) the next name is Ar-Adunakhôr a Númenórean name. See p. 315. The change of names went with a complete rejection of the Elf-friendship, and of the ‘theological’ teaching the Númenóreans had received from them.)
Sauron was first defeated by a ‘miracle’: a direct action of God the Creator, changing the fashion of the world, when appealed to by Manwë: see III p. 317. Though reduced to ‘a spirit of hatred borne on a dark wind’, I do not think one need boggle at this spirit carrying off the One Ring, upon which his power of dominating minds now largely depended.
No mention of a Ring here. Just cunning and knowledge. And there is no mention of the matter at all in CT's version of The Silmarillion. My quote from it is pretty clear. He went back to Barad-dur and again took up the Ring. If he's wearing a Ring in Numenor... why would it be necessary for him to "again take it up"???from The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien, Letter 131 to Milton Waldman dating from probably 1951
...But there he swiftly rises by his cunning and knowledge from servant to chief counsellor of the king, and seduces the king and most of the lords and people with his lies.
Indeed this is true Grond, forgive my math in that hour. Now let me comment on that wich you have said:Grond said:Firstly, I think you are speaking of the 19 and not the 18 (7 for dwarves + 9 for man + 3 for elves = 19 Elven Rings of Power).
You also speak of all of the Rings being distributed to the Races of Middle-earth for domination by Sauron. This, too, is incorrect. The Elves made all of the Rings of Power in Eregion. 16 of these Rings were made with Sauron's direct input and were later recovered by Sauron (who later distributed them to Men and Dwarves) when his army stormed Eregion. He tortured Celebrimbor (maker of the Three) and Celebrimbor divulged the location of the 16 but would not reveal where the Three were kept. The Three were never seen by Sauron nor were they ever sullied by Sauron... but, since they were made with knowledge gleaned from Sauron, they were still subject to the One.
Men he found the easiest to sway of all the peoples of the Earth; but long he sought to persuade the Elves to his service, for he knew that the Firstborn had the greater power; and he went far and wide among them, and his hue was still that of one both fair and wise.
As you yourself point out, this is not the case because the Seven were not all obtained. But I see now that you meant he obtained them and gave them to the Dwarves, so nevermind.Isthir said:So it was that Sauron obtained Sixteen of the Nineteen Rings of Power
I recall no passage where it would state that the Úlairi were especially powerful or rich, expecially not due to the Nine Rings.. The men to whom the Ring were given were, I believe, said to have been 'lords', but the phrasing is ambiguous. Anyway, only the Seven had the power to accumulate wealth, and that was only because Sauron was not able to break the will of the Dwarves.Isthir; "The Power of the Mortals' Nine" said:Those who recieved a Ring of Power became mighty rulers of there time and amassed great wealt and fame.
Sorry but I'm not a big fan of this chronicler style, especially when all that you are saying is known to everybody here.Isthir; "The Failure of the Dwarven Seven" said:
You are probably correct, but I don't think Sauron was too worried abot them as they were subject to the One; and because he was in possession of the One at the time, and knew that while he wore it the Three would not be used, he was pretty much home and clear.Isthir; "The Valiant Three" said:It was for these Three that Sauron's lust grew, for he desired greatly now to be the Lord of all that laid within ME, so the Black Years began.
This fits into my ways of thinking, that the One Ring had immense power, not only when it was on the finger of Sauron. I think that the word "possession" here means only "possession", wherever the thing, i.e. the Ring actually was. As long as it was guarded in Sauron's house, he could use his power, because from there it kind of affected him, strengened him.the Ruling Ring was off of his finger and safely kept in Barad-dur somewhere
Undoubtedly; but I believe it is more specifically a matter of physical contact. The Ring was in its entirety a physical entity in the Seen world, even though Sauron's power (which I assume would have been 'visible' in the Unseen; what a paradox) was not, and so I would conclude that to have access to the power stored in the Ring Sauron would have to have a physical from which which to wear it. But you have a point aobut the proximity question, because even when Sméagol didn't touch the Ring he desired it because its malice did not require physical interaction to begin.Hirila said:Maybe its effect is related to proximity
Sauron actually had the Ring with him when he was in Númenor.Hirila said:So when Sauron was on Numenor, far away from the Ring, his power was lightly decreased
Well I suppose so; but what I believe is that, like the One, the Three only enhanced the inherent powers and strength of the wielder. When Gandalf had Narya, he was able through his Ainuric essense to create living fire; Galadriel probably used Nenya to 'work' her Mirror and trap the light of Eärendil into water, and Elrond controlled the Bruinen. But all of these poeple were either Noldor, Peredhil or Maia, so they would all have considerably strong fëar to begin with, which the Rings would only enhance. (This is still only a theoryHirila said:As for the other Rings... Obviously they all gave the person that wore them great power.
How was the Seven turned to evil? They were used to amass wealth, but that ins't evil in itself.. I'mprobably missing something here..Hirila said:
Um there actually is no Ring of Earth; Vilya is the Ring of Air, and Water and Fire are the other two.Hirila said:The Ring of Earth
Ah now this is very interesting! This I would agree with, not only because I agree with the whole Taoist idea of opposites but also because we witness the loss of power in the Three when the One is destroyed. Fantastic point Hirila!Hirila said:So like always, good and evil lie very close to each other, and without the one, the other cannot exist. (That is, why with the destruction of the One Ring, the Three also lost their power, having lost their evil counterpart.)
Lantarion said:As you yourself point out, this is not the case because the Seven were not all obtained.
Lantarion said:
From The Silmarillion: Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age
Lantarion said:And as I remember, Sauron did in fact obtain as many as three of the Seven, so your claim that Thrór's would have been the only one left is false.
Lantarion said:You are probably correct, but I don't think Sauron was too worried abot them as they were subject to the One; and because he was in possession of the One at the time, and knew that while he wore it the Three would not be used, he was pretty much home and clear.
the Three only enhanced the inherent powers and strength of the wielder.
Hirila said:If the Three really only enhanced already existing dispositions, then we would have to assume, that Gandlaf had been a "fireworker" all the time, that Galadriel always had loved water and that Elrond, was attached to the air. () That the dwarves are by nature greedy and that men sought for power, wealth and glory.
But what if not?
Could it be, that the Rings were made to boost certain dispositions of the maker.
That way the One Ring would have been evil, because Sauron was evil. The Seven and the Nine would have led to an evil end, because the evil spirit of Sauron was involved in their making. And the Three are attached to three elements, because the elves are attached to the elements. And the Ringbearers then took a liking in "their" element after they had received "their" Ring.
(I don't want to discuss whether there should have been a fourth ring, a Ring of Earth, when there are already three of the four elements present. Remember? Fire, Water, Air, and Earth. That's for another thread.)
So basically, you don't know either.Isthir said:Now if it was that Gandalf(Olórin) was originally a fire-wielder, it is said not (to my knowledge anyways), therefore it can only be speculated through his deeds, though all that were recorded were after receiving Narya. Therfore I leave the mystery of the effects of the Red Ring upon Mithrandir to the reader.
By explanation do you mean your theory as to the Rings Vilya and Nenya? That would be nice to hear; but if you are thikning of giving us a synopsis of the lives of these people, I think that is a little unnecessary.Isthir said:
I am assuming the smiley face is added due to the fact that there are conflicting accounts (by the author) of whether Sauron was possessed of the Ruling Ring while he was on his Numenorean vacation.
While their have been several debates on the exact nature of the Flame of Anor, I have always felt that the Ring Narya was the "Flame of Anor". And before everyone goes off on how the Three were Rings of Preservation let us not forget that fire does destroy but it also purifies and renews... so there!!from The Fellowship of the Ring, A Conspiracy Unmasked,
...'You cannot pass,' he said. The orcs stood still, and a dead silence
fell. 'I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor. You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udyn. Go back to the Shadow! You cannot pass.'...
... At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him.The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand. A blinding sheet of white flame sprang up. The bridge cracked. Right at the Balrog's feet it broke, and the stone upon which it stood crashed into the gulf, while the rest remained, poised, quivering like a tongue of rock thrust out into emptiness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?