• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Did Fingolfin's host have to cross Helcaraxë?

Fingolfin was just trying to remove the tension from his family and maybe be able to see his father every once in a while. I'm not sure if Fingolfin loved Fëanor though. Maybe as a child and maybe even before Morgoth was released. But I didn't feel a strong love from his words during the chapter of the Silmarils
 
To return to this:
I thought only when you say the name of Eru they get that "physical force" as you said. Is it not true then?
How exactly this applied to the Elves, I don't know, but we do see the effects of oaths throughout Tolkien's works. In addition to the Deadmen, it's seen in "Cirion and Eorl" in Unfinished Tales; Cirion's oath does cite Eru ('I Eru i '; 'of the One who'), but Eorl's does not:
As far as I'm aware, these people had never yet heard of Eru (though I could be mistaken, and would welcome correction). Nevertheless, they considered the oath unbreakable, and in fact the wording could imply that the Shadow would "fall upon" anyone who broke it. In any event, both peoples held the oaths "sacred" and kept them down through the Ages, including the Fourth. (I can't resist observing here how the nonsense inserted by PJ&Co. for "dramatic tension" makes a particularly annoying mockery of this, but that's by the way.)

Nor do I know if the Deadmen had heard of Eru, though they had worshipped Sauron. The text doesn't mention him in relation to their oath, but as I said above, the effects of breaking it were definitely "physical", among other things.

We tend to forget the power of oaths and words to pre-literate people, before the age of written contracts and squabbling litigation, so amusingly satirized in the episode of Bilbo's will, and "Grubb, Grubb, and Burrowes" in The Hobbit, where "the legal bother, indeed, lasted for years". As said previously, a reading of the sagas will impress this.

Lastly, there's another example in LOTR:
'Swear?' said Frodo.
Frodo drew himself up, and again Sam was startled by his words and his stern voice. 'On the Precious? How dare you?' he said.
Nonetheless, he does dare. One can imagine, say, a Norseman from the 9th century sitting up, on having this read to him.

There have been decades of discussion and argument about what exactly caused Gollum's fall into the fire, one of them being direct intervention by Eru. We've seen it here recently, and I don't doubt someone somewhere has posted a picture of a giant ghostly finger flicking him over the edge. But Tolkien, as usual, is far more subtle and ambiguous for such a simple, one-level explanation.

I can easily picture our imaginary Norseman listening on, until we come to the passage where Smeagol/Gollum argues himself into breaking his oath.

"There", he'd say; "There. He has doomed himself".
 
I confess I only just now understood this... 🤦‍♀️
 
(I can't resist observing here how the nonsense inserted by PJ&Co. for "dramatic tension" makes a particularly annoying mockery of this, but that's by the way.)
As online critic Lindsay "Nostalgia Chick" Ellis used to call it, PJ's "Forced Conflict". His greatest flaw and where he always broke from Tolkien even in LotR where he was more loyal. The scenes I hate the most.
"There", he'd say; "There. He has doomed himself".
He wanted to swear by the Ring and so he died by it.

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…