Yeah, for some reason there have been a lot of noise lately about the
Dagor Dagorath. But I believe that
Tolkien abandoned that idea and that's why it wasn't added to
the Silmarillion except for some vague mentions.
Welcome
Ricardo! Over the years I've annoyed plenty of folk (all over the web) with the following distinction, annoying as it must be. It's my distinction yes, but I think it can be backed up by the "evidence", such as it is.
We know Tolkien abandoned the Second Prophecy of
Mandos; even Christopher Tolkien comments (in
Morgoth's Ring) that the Second Prophecy was
"definitively" abandoned. But we -- or I at least -- don't know if Tolkien
certainly abandoned the
content of this prophecy, given that, in Morgoth's Ring again, JRRT re-characterized it as a
Mannish Myth.
And
in my opinion, the prophecy of Andreth (Mannish Prophecy) at least casts an arguable measure of doubt with respect to a role for Turambar, even
if the mannish myth was upheld (meant to be part of the legendarium) -- as, according to Andreth, Turambar comes back from the dead to slay
Ancalagon at the Wrathy War.
Could the legendarium contain both a Mannish Prophecy
and a Mannish Myth in which
Túrin gets some measure of revenge? I think it
could, but this is pure conjecture. Moreover,
Arda Healed could "now" -- meaning in Tolkien's later years -- be attributed to other ideas besides what was found in the former prophecy.
Why abandon the
prophecy specifically? Partly, I think, because if JRRT puts these statements in the
Mouth of Mandos himself, whatever he says is very arguably to be seen as
certainly to come about.
The
trees aren't moving around the world.
Good point
! I suppose it's also
possible that "a given" Mannish Myth might include a flat-world scenario; but then again, it's also merely
possible that someday I'll shut up about the Dagor Dagorath, and the Second Prophecy.
