david_wendelken
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Messages
- 944
It's probably just the way the camera is picking up the light reflecting off the rough surface of the cloth.And I don't know what's going on with this photo, it makes it look like the red book cloth is all wrinkly instead of flatly glued to the book board in the cover. It's not wrinkly, it's perfectly flat.
-- This thread is for use by those who write. The intent is to provide a place to list your project(s) in progress, give a brief of what they are, and encourage one another to 'keep going, and keep at it.'
-- Like any artist or crafter, writers' project bins can become filled with 'stuff started....still in progress...' for (a-ahem)... way too long.
-- Let's see if the family here can help each other through a bit of encouragement and accountability to "keep on keepin' on" and get those projects finished.
Thank you for sharing. A wide range of subject matter indeed.CL
- Urban Fantasy: The first in my High Fantasy/Science Fiction Saga
- A Romance Novel
- A Sci-fi Retelling of the Book of Exodus.
- A Religious Children's story.
For efficiency's sake, maybe you could combine some of them in one story? If nothing else, the thought-experiment might lead to new insights!CL
- Urban Fantasy: The first in my High Fantasy/Science Fiction Saga
- A Romance Novel
- A Sci-fi Retelling of the Book of Exodus.
- A Religious Children's story.
Indeed. An Urban Fantasy Romance Retelling the Exodus, cast as a Children's Story.maybe you could combine some of them in one story?
Unfortunately the Urban Fantasy is just one in a very well crafted, detailed. and immersive universe.Indeed. An Urban Fantasy Romance Retelling the Exodus, cast as a Children's Story.
Perhaps Grandpa sitting beside the bed of a sick grandchild, telling it. (Shades of The Princess Bride.)
I'd buy and read it..!
Well so be it then.These are just the ones in the pipeline.
Amen, It's the one after this urban fantasy I am excited about. That's the High fantasy/epic fantasy trilogy I first came up with.Well so be it then.
I'll just need to get and read each as it comes out separately. (I've no doubt they'll all be worth it..!)
You're young yet... God willing, you've got plenty time to finish them all.
That's the High fantasy/epic fantasy trilogy I first came up with.
So so excited.
Always good to hear our writers being excited.I'm so excited for it, though, as it's the first idea I've had which was not related to The Silmarilion or any other fantasy work I'm obsessed with!
Here's one product I found very helpful. https://sefirot.it/fabula-deck. The web page has a video and explanation of how it works. You could make your own deck, of course. Here are a few really important tricks to using this: Every card is a question to ask yourself. Every answer is a To-Do list item to write, and it's also a set of questions to ask yourself. Used that way it helps you fill in the gaps in your story and forces your creativity to get to work.I'm from Iran, so most apps are banned in here, and I won't be able to have access to it most likely.
Would love to receive in an email format, though, if you're still offering.
I have a query, if you please. When you say "deductively", are you referring to our natural ability to reason? Most of our everyday reasoning is abductive in nature, according to what I have been taught, or inductive. Deductive reasoning is a bit less commonly used.OK I confess, a little more pondering and a bit of sleep are always good things.
I realized this morning I need to restructure my Preface, Introduction and Chapter 1 into just a Preface and Introduction, combining material and streamlining entry into the book matter itself.
Then the book will be broken into 3 sections: The Silmarillion, The Hobbit, and The Lord of the Rings.
Each section will demonstrate both inductively and deductively how Tolkien wrapped his 'moral and religious elements', along with his 'Catholic/Christian' background, into his works.
Virtually every author I've read (27 of them) have approached the subject deductively as I've mentioned. Worse, they've approached the subject from their perspective of Tolkien, rather than from what he did with his work(s).
But as I say in my current Introduction:
- "Most authors and debaters approach this subject focused on Tolkien himself, establishing their reasoning based on deductions extracted from their personal, ingrained views. They believe “because Tolkien was raised, lived in, lived out, and was deeply committed to, his Catholicism/Christianity he was also controlled by it. He could not overcome his conditioning. Because of this, since he said certain things seeming to be in conflict here or there, these following conclusions must be so.
- We can’t blame them. They are, sadly, the ones having been 'conditioned.' Most of us think deductively and draw our conclusions in this same way by nature, having been trained to do so from birth. Only through strong intentionality, turning our thinking on its proverbial head, can we overcome this misfortune of our education and broaden our views."
Anyway, the structure of the book being in the 3 distinct sections will allow the reader to enter anyone's work where they are most 'comfortable' - especially those who may not be familiar with The Silmarillion. They're free to start at either TH or LoTR and work backward, whatever they choose. Each unveils Tolkien's genius within its own context. (Though some will make reference either forward or backward into the other works from time to time, helping the reader see the unity of the whole)
Anyway, once restructured here, on we go.
This part bothered me, because it seemed you were saying something akin to "deductive reasoning is flawed, and we must overcome it".Most of us think deductively and draw our conclusions in this same way by nature, having been trained to do so from birth. Only through strong intentionality, turning our thinking on its proverbial head, can we overcome this misfortune of our education and broaden our views."
Indeed you do. And this puts you in a minority group.If I have overreacted, I apologize. I have tried to explain myself politely and leave open ways I may be wrong, so I am open to critique. I have been taught all my life by someone very knowledgeable in logic and reasoning, and while I am nowhere near his level yet, I have some ability.
This piece opens a massive opportunity for misunderstanding, so requires careful explanation.(though I am not sure what you meant by "trained from birth").
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?