• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

What are you writing about now?

My writing coach made an observation today. He said that Shakespeare's tragedies were only tragedies because the story hero was in the wrong play.
If Hamlet were in Othello, he would figure out right away that Iago was lying and ruin his plans. If Othello were in Hamlet, he would have run through the murderous king in short order. They were tragedies because the heros were not able to overcome their limitations and do what was needful in the circumstances.

Might be a useful idea for someone...
 
The Sarati were letters invented and used in Valinor before Fëanor invented the Tengwar. They are normally written from top to bottom, unlike the Tengwar.

 
The third chapter of IWH is now complete and posted!

 
Got a copy of "Writing Active Hooks" by Mary Buckham on Monday. A writing mentor gave me a high-level overview of her material last Saturday evening. She described ten different kinds of hooks and how they might be used. So, today I read the first chapter, which was on Action/Danger hooks and then set to work on the recently outlined bad-guy backstory for Volume I. I looked for Action/Danger hook ideas and added them to my outline. In the process of thinking up the hooks, I was really able to flesh out more of the outline and come up with a number of scene ideas (which also went into the outline). Added just shy of 4,200 words to the outline.

Woot!

Now I'm reading about the Overpowering Emotion Hook and I'll work on the outline tomorrow. I'll lather, rinse, and repeat for the other action hooks.
 
Well,the Overpowering Emotion hook chapter and review of my outline didn't take that long. Found a few key places where it very much belongs.

Next up is the Surprising Situation hooks, which are hooks that are a surprise to the character, or the reader, or both.
 
Lovely to see how all the editing pulls an even better story out of a good one :]
Thanks!

I wrote the first draft of my new first chapter last night. I tried real hard to put some good hooks in it. I suspect, by the time I have the full book done, I'll be much better at putting in hooks so the 2nd draft will have better ones (and more of them, too!)
 
Currently working on the first chapter of my "Of Doom & Death" series which is my retelling of the deaths of all the Finwians. The idea started when I first wrote my one shot, A Final Farewell, almost two years ago.
Now, the original idea is the same, but the way I decided to approach this has evolved a lot through the last year. I won't be saying much else, and I won't be spoiling who is the first one. You'll find out soon when you're reading it anyway.

Are you ready, Youth Gang?!
 
My new technique of tracking character traits, hooks, and mcguffin info is really helping me write much tighter prose.

I decided to drop the first 5 chapters I had outlined and start with the 6th. I moved the outline elements from those chapters that I still wanted to be revealed into my new chapter one and deleted the ones that were now OBE (overtaken by events).

I've written the essential starting scene, a follow-up scene, and part of a 2nd follow-up. 1172 words that cover 44% of the points I wanted covered in those 6 chapters in a tiny fraction of the verbiage. Woot! Plus, I know which points I made and which I haven't, so I can make sure they get included somewhere and not forgotten.

I'm really liking this new method!
 
Well, I see things still roll along here in our 'writing encouragements' thread. Good to know.
I've not been idle here either.
I've suspended work on Middle Earth Moral and Religious Elements for awhile, and moved over to The Religion of Opinion.
The more I watch mankind trip all over themselves, the more I feel this is the more immediately important work to get out there.

My hope is in the end it will land me in jail, as I expose all the complicity of the System in making sure "the preferred Opinions" are pushed into and formed within the herd as they moo their way into conformity with the Machine. It's astonishing.

Anyway, here's the

The Religion of Opinion

Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Preface
Introduction

Chapter 1: Opinion, The Unrecognized Idol
Chapter 2: Opinion In History and Today
Chapter 3: Opinion And Cultural Conditioning
Chapter 4: Opinion, The System and the Machine
Chapter 5: Opinion and You

Appendix A: A Very Few Definitions
Appendix B: The Religion of Opinion - Doctrines and Covenants
Appendix C: The Religion of Opinion - Statement of Faith

The Acknowledgements, Preface, and Appendix B and C are written. (Acknowledgements and Preface 'final' but under consideration. Appendix B and C revised and now 'final.')
The Appendices will be referred to in and throughout the book.

In this case, the Chapters will be written before the Introduction, so they can inform the Introduction, rather than the other way around.
I'm about to start both Appendix A and Chapter 1.
Acknowledgements and Preface may be informed by the writing of the chapters as well, and a final alteration done.

Stand in awe, beloved, at the power and pervasiveness of Opinion. It is omnipresent, no place hidden from its gaze, and its work.
Bow in subservience, lest you break free of its chains, and find Perspective instead.
The System and the Machine redeem the time devoted to the maintenance and increase of your bondage.
Can you escape? Will you try?

May the 12 steps from an Input Event to clear Perception be your starting point, and the 8 steps from Perception to Perspective be your guide.
 
Twelve Steps to Forming and Reforming a Perception:


We must never allow any "new input*" to enter our processing stream as other than a clean, pure "New Input Event."
* - "new input" does not mean it's brand new information never heard before. It simply means it's "new in this moment". Even if we've seen, heard, and think we've understood it, a thousand times already. It is NEW in the instant it comes to us. All our processing begins from that receipt.
The diagram reflects our conscious effort to block any "new input event" from reaching us at any pre-existing point in the processing cycle other than as a 'new event.' it may well contain entirely unexpected information for us we will miss, if we do not 'identify' it, carefully 'compare' it, 'recognize' it for what it is, and how it may or may not fit what we already know, etc. through the chain.
To subvert this step by step process is to arrive at an Opinion in advance of even having a clear view of the Perception we should develop before we move beyond this,
And Perception is just the first step of the climb to an actual Perspective, rather than an Opinion. So you see, if we fail to get to a clear "perception" - the foundational step - we just distort the ultimate Perspective we SHOULD have all the more.



Once we get a clean and correct Perception of a New Input Event, we can begin up the steps to a right Perspective - being equally as cautious as we take each step not to let it be interfered with by any new Affective Responses, prejudices, etc. working to creep in along the way.

This is NOT how we've been trained to think, or to process information. Many call it 'impractical."
But consider:
Your mind is incredibly elastic. It can be retrained. It just takes exercise. The problem is, it's been trained by the System and the Machine to think according to THEIR dictates - so you have years of practice with a misfunctioning and misfiring brain.

Training is entirely possible.
Brainwashing is one key way we see that done. There are tens of thousands of others - all commercials for example, are intentionally produced to stimulate 'trigggers' in you other than the realities of a 'new input event.'
You're not good enough as you are.
You're missing something.
There's something you need to fear.

etc.

Anyway, thought I'd give you this taste of the future.

Stand in awe - marvel at the Idol of Opinion. It is where the Machine wants you to live and how the System is engineered to try to insure you behave accordingly.

However - knowledge IS power - and once we know, we can choose differently.
Problem is, the Machine engineers the System to be sure what we "know" is according to their preferred model, to achieve their desired results.

Stand by for news... the book will come along in its time. (Unless I'm jailed or burned at the stake first.)

(p.s. - the above diagrams are Ent originals and will be in the book. Use them if wish, but the less far they get in distribution, the less I'll be accused of 'plagairism' should someone else put them to use before I get done.)
 
Last edited:
In between these important updates, I've made some good progress on my Amandil story. I'm almost done with all my theme's answers.
"Is the preservation of your moral integrity more important than your life or the lives of your loved ones?"
There's a billion answers, I'll wager, but I was able to think of only 50 Yes answers, 80 No answers, and now working on the I Don't Know/Both answers.

For the moment, I pause for a snack and a delve into The Nibelungenlied with The Klage. The first part is the story of Siegfried and Kriemhild his wife. It's gonna be a yummy read :]
 
I've written around 6k for one of my stories since yesterday, and I think this arc is almost finished. It came easily to me, for some reason.

And as for the start of Doom & Death series, I fear it must be postponed yet again, bcs what I was writing didn't quite fit the theme of the rest of the chapters.

That story is now a prequel to one of my other stories, and I am hoping to post it publicly on TTF tomorrow. (It's already up on Ao3)
 
"Is the preservation of your moral integrity more important than your life or the lives of your loved ones?"
What a lovely question, flinging out the carpet of need to ponder many fundamentals as it does.
Begs many, many questions, before an answer can be pondered.
Thank you for this input event.
 
SIr Thomas More--erstwhile Lord Chancellor to Henry VIII-- actually answered that (for himself).
He went to the scaffold (1535) and lost his head rather than surrender his convictions to what he deemed a "moral compromise".
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…