• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Did Tolkien get the idea of using rings from Beowulf

The Epic of Gilgamesh was essentially the first piece of literature at all, certainly fantasy literature, so I assume that the dragon depicted in there would be the first recorded one.
Don't you think it interesting that almost every culture in history has stories of dragons.
 
What makes you think that there has been the very first dragon?
Perhaps it's the oldest documented depiction of a dragon?

@HALETH✒🗡 - re: What makes you think that there has been the very first dragon?
... Because it is a thing twisted from something else originally generated as a part of the Ainur's song adorning Eru's theme? Therefore, there "must" be a "first".

@Radaghast - re: Perhaps it's the oldest documented depiction of a dragon?
... BANG..!! Now that's 'hitting the nail with your head'. (Paul Harvey).

@Elbereth Vala Varda - re: The Epic of Gilgamesh was essentially the first piece of literature at all,
... Understanding your sentiment, this isn't quite accurate Ent thinks. Epic of Gilgamesh is simply the oldest thing written of which a very few copies (2 Ent has confirmed so far, and they are quite different) and some fragments have been found. And if one could write at the time the oldest of those was done, others could write as well.

Ent's viewpoint (different from an opinion) is there is a 99.998 % likelihood in verbal lore preceding writing, and older written lore unknown, tales of dragons existed.

(Very sorry, Ent has a hard time dropping his 'literalist' bent..!)
 
I don't know what it is with you people and eggs.
Ent thinks one could say MANY have had this same reaction.

Careful observation from his hill in the forest from which he sees much that goes on in the world, Ent has come to believe it's somewhat of an old inside 'joke' or such, promulgated again occassionally by those who bring it back at absurd and meaningless times when the mood is light and the atmosphere seems appropriate.

Several have spoken up about it, including Ent, with never a real history being provided...just more eggings.

Ultimately many have chosen to eggnore it, while others have simply egged them on.
Of course, Ent eggscuses himself from any such eggsploits. (Or not.)

1687025057861.gif


(Just be aware the 🥓 also shows up at times.)
 
Last edited:
Because it is a thing twisted from something else originally generated as a part of the Ainur's song adorning Eru's theme? Therefore, there "must" be a "first".
Yes, I understand that the first one must be mentioned somewhere. By "there" I meant Epic of Gilgamesh in particular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ent
Ent thinks one could say MANY have had this same reaction.
(Just be aware the 🥓 also shows up at times.)
We've probably all read "The Hobbit". Weeeeell, every time Bilbo has the feeling he's out of place where he is at a particular time, what does he think of? Being back home. And what does he imagine himself doing practically every time ?

We're all just little Bilbo clones ... 🥓🥚🥓🥚🥓🥚🥓🥚🥓🥚
 
@HALETH✒🗡 - re: What makes you think that there has been the very first dragon?
... Because it is a thing twisted from something else originally generated as a part of the Ainur's song adorning Eru's theme? Therefore, there "must" be a "first".

@Radaghast - re: Perhaps it's the oldest documented depiction of a dragon?
... BANG..!! Now that's 'hitting the nail with your head'. (Paul Harvey).

@Elbereth Vala Varda - re: The Epic of Gilgamesh was essentially the first piece of literature at all,
... Understanding your sentiment, this isn't quite accurate Ent thinks. Epic of Gilgamesh is simply the oldest thing written of which a very few copies (2 Ent has confirmed so far, and they are quite different) and some fragments have been found. And if one could write at the time the oldest of those was done, others could write as well.

Ent's viewpoint (different from an opinion) is there is a 99.998 % likelihood in verbal lore preceding writing, and older written lore unknown, tales of dragons existed.

(Very sorry, Ent has a hard time dropping his 'literalist' bent..!)
Not sure if they were first but the dragon was one of 12 animals listed as part of the Chinese zodiac which seems to have origins in 5th century BCE.

 
This thread has caught a very bad case of Derailmentitus.
 
This thread has caught a very bad case of Derailmentitus.
As an undeniable "tangent troll", I can confirm your appraisal. 😏

But then, owning three translations of "Beowulf", including JRRT' own prose version edited by Christopher and published in 2014, my feeling is that rings played an almost non-existent role in that tale. Not much fodder for discussion. What JRRT lifted from "Beowulf", by his own admission, was Bilbo stealing the cup from Smaug's hoard on his first visit. That would also not have led to much discussion had the question been asked of this scene; actually, only one answering post would have been necessary there: "Yes."

I know about doing OP's that peter out without many replies (on-topic, anyway). Only one of my OP's ever made it past page 1:

 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top