A loooong post...
Ok, having refreshed myself I can tackle the difficult topic of predestination... if you feel that this is off-topic, I'm sorry, let me know. I will here think about predestination as it happens on the real world, though I have reason to believe (see the thread 'Finding
God in the LotR') that
Eru and God are the same in
Tolkien's mind, so the discussion is also applicable to
Middle Earth. These seem to be the hypotheses voluntereed so far:
1) Full predestination -- nothing we can do will change what is destined for us, since it is engraven in God's intellect from the beginning of time. This view implies the Calvinist conclusion that the damned and
the blessed are separated from the start, and nothing we do can change that. Actually, only God's intervention can change it. I believe faila believes in that.
2) No predestination -- Even if God knows what we will do, his knowledge is not binding at all on our free will, since it happens from 'outside' time. So that God 'sees' the future as we see the past, as something unchangeable, but what will build the future (just as what has built the past) is our free choices, unfettered by God's knowledge. This means that the blessed will be blessed because of their good works (refusal of sin, embracing of God), aided by God's Providence, but originating from their free will nonetheless. And the same applies to the damned. Goldmare apparently believes in that.
Please inform me if I have misrepresented any of your viewpoints. As I said before, I am more inclined to Goldmare's side, but the opinion as I have stated it is not precisely like mine. This is because Church doctrine (remember, I think Tolkien's Eru is fully compatible with Catholic doctrine. Also, I am a Catholic myself) refuses the theory that man can raise himself up to Blessedness without God's intervention -- grace. Good works without grace are not enough. This is an effect of the Fall.
So this is my third hypothesis (which I think is very much like the Catholic Church explanation of predestination):
There is Pre-destination, prior destination. We must keep in mind two facts: 1) God loves all
men. In as much as He loves everyone, He wants everybody to be saved. But this word, 'wants', while an expression of God's will, describe his prior position, his 'default position', so to speak. After one sins, God's Justice (and keep in mind that His Justice and His Love are one and the same -- God is simplicity itself, He can not be divided into
concepts) would deny salvation. And we all sinned in Adam. So as it stood before Christ, we were denied salvation, even though we were pre-destined to be saved. I will soon comment on the word pre-destination itself, and it's difference from simple destination. But let us continue. Christ's sacrifice, in an Act of Mercy, saved all. This is not offensive to God's Justice, since the creditor can forgive any or all of his debts -- it is the debtor who is bound to Justice, not the creditor. The second fact (2) is God's Providence, the government of the Universe. While it was ridiculed by Voltaire's Dr. Pangloss, the Christian position (and I do not keep myself to Catholicism here, I think all Christians would agree) is that Providence makes this the best of all possible worlds. That means, even the
Evil in this world, though not created by God, can, by his Providence, result in Good. God deemed Ethical Freedom a greater good than Bliss, and Adam's fall was a result of that. So everything that followed, including the horrors of the last century, is laboring for the greater good of the Creation.
Pre-destination, prior destination, then, is in God, not in man. He pre-destined the human
race to be His Children, to glory in his Presence, but we fell. After this episode, even while our destination (the result of our own free acts) had changed, God was saving us by Christ, so that his pre-destination prevailed over our mistakes. And through God's Providence, the government of the Universe, our acts and good works are heard and God arranges them to insure the greater good. So that we may, by prayer and works, change the fate of others, and perhaps even ourselves.
Bottomline: we are all potentially saved. The only thing that is lacking is for us to acknowledge Christ as Our Savior, and it is done. In that sense, we are predestined, and nothing we can do will move us further to the goal, the debt is already paid. BUT, our acts and prayers have an effect on whether ourselves (and others, most especially others) acknowledge God's Gift and are therefore effectively saved.
Was that too confusing? What do you think about it? I'd like to hear your input if I have not bored you to death... and if you feel this thread is a proper vehicle.