
Majimaune said:
you have to remember that Paolini was 15 when he wrote Eragon
Nasuada faltered, disconcerned then forged ahead. "Would you be willing to keep an eye on Elva for me? I need-"
Of course! And I'll keep two eyeson her if I can spare them..."
The lead character Eragon is a farm boy who one day finds a strange stone that hatches into a dragon. The evil king sends messengers after the dragon because he had killed off all dragon riders but himself and wants to capture/kill Eragon and his dragon, Saphira. They basically burn down the kid's farm while he is away one day and he, the dragon, and an elderly, mysterious resident of the village run for it. Rescue an elven princess. Meet a mysterious wanderer. Join rebels.
Wonko The Sane said:So, what's the problem with this book?
The fact you've seen it all before? Plenty of good books are written from tried and tested perspectives and storylines.
The fact that the kid's writing is ****? Pretty unforgiveable. Just cos a kid writes a book doesn't mean his dad should publish it. Not all the trash that gets written deserves to be published.
Lack of good characters? Again, something I'd not forgive easily.
That it was predictable? Plenty of books are predictable, but they're not necessarily ****.
Just curious. Based on your reviews I don't really want to read the thing...I just want to know if it has any redeeming qualities...and how a 15 year old can publish a rubbish book!!?!