• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Destruction of the Witch-King

Anárion

King of Gondor
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
114
In the Battle of the Plains of Pelennor, Éowyn, with the help of Merry, destroys the Witch-King. And in Unfinished Tales (I think) Earnil is all mad because he was put to shame by the Witch-King and Cirdan or some other Elf like that, says something about that no man would be able to kill the WK.

But, since the WK is really just a wraith, or a ghost so to speak, he would not be able to die would he? Éowyn's sword should have passed right through him, and Merry's also. In fact, if he was just a wraith, or ghost, or whatever, how would he even wield his mace, and hold the reigns of the fell beast he was riding?
 
The Witch-king and the other eight Nazgul were not Ghosts each had indeed a physical body and were after a fashion Alive, kept from dying by the powers the rings they were enslaved by and the One Ring. They were called Wraiths because they could not be seen by most peoples in Middle-earth.

As for the Swords of Eowyn and Merry. First I doubt that Eowyn would have been able to harm the Witch-king un-aided. It was Merry's blow that allowed Eowyn's sword to kill him.
So passed the sword of the Barrow-downs, work of Westernesse. But glad would he have been to know its fate who wrought it slowly long ago in the North-kingdom when the Dúnedain were young, and chief among their foes was the dread realm of Angmar and its sorcerer king. No other blade, not though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.
So it was the Sword of the North Kingdom that weakened the Witch-king and made it possible for another sword to strike him down.
 
Gothmog said:
. They were called Wraiths because they could not be seen by most peoples in Middle-earth.

Then how could Éowyn see to strike him then? She was no one special, just a silly shield maidian. Same with Merry, he was just a regular hobbit and both he and Éowyn would have probably fallen under the "most people" section. Although Éowyn was queenly, she was not a queen.
 
Very simple. The Witch-king was not visible but his armour and clothing were.

'Éowyn! Éowyn!' cried Merry. Then tottering, struggling up, with her last strength she drove her sword between crown and mantle, as the great shoulders bowed before her. The sword broke sparkling into many shards. The crown rolled away with a clang. Éowyn fell forward upon her fallen foe. But lo! the mantle and hauberk were empty. Shapeless they lay now on the ground, torn and tumbled;
The Nazgul were invisible but wore clothing to allow them to have dealings with others in Middle-earth such as their own followers or their enimies when needed. Eowyn did not See the Witch-king but rather could see where his head was because of the mantle on his shoulders and the Crown above. She struck between these two and thereby hit what was there. This happened to be the Witch-king's head or neck.
 
I just wish that the people who did not read the books knew that it was the blade that was the WKs undoing and not Eowyn because she was a woman. But in the movie they really could not go into detail about the daggers snice there was no Tom B or anything. I always knew this about the blade and all of that in this post but I just never saw it in a thread and could read it all in one place there just always just a bit here and there. Good job Gothmog!
 
But then, in centuries before, why could not Eärnil defeat the Witch King when they were devastating Angmar? With the Elves on his side, and Arnor had just been thrown down, there were still bound to be many swords of the Númenóreans and of the Dúnedain. Im sure he would have had a great sword like Andruil (maybe not that good, but it would be better then that silly dagger that Merry had.)
 
Well that silly dagger Merry had was the only blade able to harm the WK. The blade he had was made for one purpose to kill the Witch King of Agmar. Or at least make the WK mortal or able to be harmed so Eowyn could deal the blow to finish him off.
 
Anárion said:
But then, in centuries before, why could not Eärnil defeat the Witch King when they were devastating Angmar? With the Elves on his side, and Arnor had just been thrown down, there were still bound to be many swords of the Númenóreans and of the Dúnedain. Im sure he would have had a great sword like Andruil (maybe not that good, but it would be better then that silly dagger that Merry had.)
Unfortunately for Eärnil, his horse got scared, and he never got the opportunity to try out your theory. So it has nothing to do with the armament.
 
He snuk, she cheated, I was disgraced. That simple:D

Anyways Rhi, I thought we've established this...
 
BlackCaptain said:
He snuk, she cheated, I was disgraced. That simple:D

Anyways Rhi, I thought we've established this...
I didn't get my head cut off. Where did the cheating happen again?

Honestly, you boys are just so delusional. Why are men around of powerful women? You burned Joan of Arc, killed Bodicea, and slandered Catherine the Great--what's a girl to do?
 
Earnil is all mad because he was put to shame by the Witch-King and Cirdan or some other Elf like that, says something about that no man would be able to kill the WK.


OK, it's in Appendix A, the section on Gondor.....

It's Glorfindel.....

What he says, which was & is misconscrued by PJ, The Witch-king & many people on this site, is NOT that "no man can harm or kill the Witch-king" but, "Not by the hand of man will he fall".

It's simply a prophesy, not a life insurance guarentee against any encounters against men.
 
Bucky said:
What he says, which was & is misconscrued by PJ, The Witch-king & many people on this site, is NOT that "no man can harm or kill the Witch-king" but, "Not by the hand of man will he fall".

It's simply a prophesy, not a life insurance guarentee against any encounters against men.

I think this inculdes Man,WoMAN, Hobbit, Elf, Dwarf, Gollum, etc. etc. That could not harm the Witch King. I mean do you think Legolas could go and shoot an arrow at him and he is gone I can't picture it. The Man part appiles to everything and everyone in my opinion except may be my man Gandalf.

Nothing could touch him nothing. Except those daggers.(Name of the daggers in the first few posts)
 
Fechin said:
I think this inculdes Man,WoMAN, Hobbit, Elf, Dwarf, Gollum, etc. etc. That could not harm the Witch King. I mean do you think Legolas could go and shoot an arrow at him and he is gone I can't picture it. The Man part appiles to everything and everyone in my opinion except may be my man Gandalf.

Nothing could touch him nothing. Except those daggers.(Name of the daggers in the first few posts)

Somehow I don't think the "man part" would be applicable to someone like, say, a female elf. She is neither a Man nor male.

This prophesy/foresight thing always confuses me...
 
this prophecy is in almost every aspect a self-fulfilling one. I think it was Gildor or someone who first made the prophesy that' not by a hand of man will he fall'. Well it is reported that on hearing this 'the Lord of the Nazgul laughed', and he -as everyone else-thought that the prophecy meant that he was indestructable. As such, noone would even dare to try and meet him in battle. Merry and Eowyn did not set out to kill the Nazgul Lord, they just happened to be in the right place at the right time. As Eowyn herself says 'you stand between me and my kin.. begone lest you be deathless' She was spurred onto action by the death of her lord and king and by her own dark mood, Merry saw this great horrible wraith threatening Eowyn and did the only thing he could think of -stab the wraith in the leg. Which obviously gave Eowyn her chance. BUt I think the main contributor for the act was the Nazgul Lord himself, as he laughed when Eowyn stood between him and Theoden and sai 'do you not knwo that by no living man can kill me ?', and when he finds out he is a she, he falters, he starts to have doubts, and the possibility opens up that he could be killed.
 
Well my opinion is that NOBODY could kill him. Man or Woman of any Race!

Only one person had a shot a shot in my book and that is Gandalf(The White).

Except if they had one of those daggers he then could be harmed. Here is how I see it. Marry stabbed WK while not a fatal blow but when the dagger hit his flesh(or what not) then he became mortal(or harmable). Then a sword went though his head and there you have it no more WK. He was just at the wrong palce at the wrong time. That is my version of what happened.
 
Bucky said:
Earnil is all mad because he was put to shame by the Witch-King and Cirdan or some other Elf like that, says something about that no man would be able to kill the WK.


OK, it's in Appendix A, the section on Gondor.....

It's Glorfindel.....

What he says, which was & is misconscrued by PJ, The Witch-king & many people on this site, is NOT that "no man can harm or kill the Witch-king" but, "Not by the hand of man will he fall".

It's simply a prophesy, not a life insurance guarentee against any encounters against men.


Wait a tick, didnt Glorfindel die in a fight with a Balrog in the first age? Or is this another Glorfindel, like there is(was) 2 Gothmogs?

Anyway my "version" of the little fight, as you might call it, was that Merry kinda jumped up on the WKs back and like, stabbed him in the mantle...or something. The mantle is on his shoulders right? Well anyway, I didnt get any of this stab in the leg buisness because even though that would hurt, I doubt itd make the WK mortal...just my opinion anyway. And as "no man could harm him" then the blow that Merry did wouldnt be so harmful even if it was a dagger of the Dúnedain.
 
Yeah I bet everyone has a different view on what happened. I just wish we could ask JRR what was really going on about this issue. :rolleyes:
 
Merry's stab pierced the WK behind the knee. The knife he used was crafted specifically for use against the WK, hence the effect.

The real key is discerning what "breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will..." means.
 
A couple of things that I feel the need to sort out:

Glorfindel's prophecy: Remember that this was a prophecy, not a curse. Glorfindel did not prohibit man from killing the Witch-king. He was a very powerful elf, and what he did, was that his foresight told him that Eowyn would deal the Witch-king the final blow. I hope that I bring the meaning through, here.

Glorfindel of Gondolin, and Glorfindel of LotR is one and the same. I know that some believe that this is not so, but it can be found somewhere in the Letters.
 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top