
Originally posted by Killabee3
in thought quite a few of the Nazgul got destroyed when crossing the river to get in to lorein?
They could have been perverted to the uses of Sauron, or even back to the days of Melkor.Thus spoke a forgotten poet long ago in Rohan, recalling how tall and fair was Eorl the Young, who rode down out of the North; and there were wings upon the feet of his steed, Felaróf, father of horses. So men still sing in the evening.'
Pippin only saw one of the Nazgul in the Palantir, before speaking to Sauron himself.In a low hesitating voice Pippin began again, and slowly his words grew clearer and stronger. 'I saw a dark sky, and tall battlements,' he said. 'And tiny stars. It seemed very far away and long ago, yet hard and clear. Then the stars went in and out-they were cut off by things with wings. Very big, I think, really; but in the glass they looked like bats wheeling round the tower. I thought there were nine of them. One began to fly straight towards me, getting bigger and bigger. It had a horrible – no, no! I can't say.
Originally posted by Dáin Ironfoot I
If there were eight left after Eowyn killed the Witch-King, then what was the thing that Legolas killed on Anduin? Was that not a Nazgul's steed? Maybe it was just flying by itself...
It doesn't necessarily mean that Legolas killed the winged steed. He could have just wounded it.
In the text itself there is a footnote explaining that there are only eight because the Witch-King was made inconsequential at Pelannor. I'd say that this is pretty good evidence that Tolkien intended all the remaining eight Nazgul to be mounted on winged steeds and able to ride to Orodruin, as Eriol suggested.from Letter 246 to Mrs Eileen Elgar, discussing the eight remaining Nazgul if they had confronted Frodo at Mt. Doom
The situation as between Frodo with the Ring and the Eight might be compared to that of a small brave man armed with a devastating weapon, faced by eight savage warriors of great strength and agility armed with poisoned blades.
I don't think Tolkien is describing a horse with wings here (Rankin/Bass Return of the King had it way wrong).From Letter 211 To Rhona Beare
Pterodactyl. Yes and no. I did not intend the steed of the Witch-King to be what is now called a 'pterodactyl', and often is drawn (with rather less shadowy evidence than lies behind many monsters of the new and fascinating semi-scientific mythology of the 'Prehistoric'). But obviously it is pterodactylic and owes much to the new mythology, and its description even provides a sort of way in which it could be a last survivor of older geological eras.
From Letter 211 To Rhona Beare
Pterodactyl. Yes and no. I did not intend the steed of the Witch-King to be what is now called a 'pterodactyl', ... But obviously it is pterodactylic and owes much to the new mythology, and its description even provides a sort of way in which it could be a last survivor of older geological eras.