• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Ecthelion and glorfindel fought in all the battles of beleriand?

Turin_Turambar

Mormegil
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
532
Their names are not mentioned in the silmarillion book. but on this site it is written that ecthelion and glorfindel fought in dagor aglareb and dagor bragollach in the battle of lammoth. is it true? Is there any truth to it?
 
I wouldn't generally recommend this site, although I doubt the owners claim it represents
"pure Tolkien" in any case -- for example, Glorfindel is said to have a sibling named Neurinya.
N-who-nya?

Ecthelion of the Fountain, as far as I recall, Glorfindel and Ecthelion are not named at the battles you mentioned in your post above, but that said, one or the other or both could have fought at Lammoth for example.

In the constructed Silmarillion as published in 1977, Fingolfin's host does not fight in the Battle Under The Stars, and after passing the Grinding Ice "marched from the North unopposed through the fastness of the realm of Morgoth, and he passed over Dor-daedeloth, and his foes hid beneath the earth" . . .

. . . but in a late note to The Shibboleth of Feanor, Fingolfin's third son Argon dies in the Battle of the Lammoth. We know that Glorfindel left Valinor "in the host" of Turgon (in a late note it's even stated that Turgon had been elected supreme leader of the Noldorin hosts, with reference to Finarfin's "third host" . . . but then Fingolfin appears to return . . . so let's put that muddle aside for now).

Fingolfin takes part in the Dagor Aglareb (which occurred before Gondolin was founded at least) -- again, no specific mention of Glorfindel or Ecthelion that I recall here either.

Of course, everyone's usually somewhere 🐾

But with respect to the Dagor Bragollach anyway, this happens after Turgon departed for Gondolin, and I'd say Glorfindel and Ecthelion didn't take part in this battle.
 
Last edited:
The New Notion Club archives is fan-made materials for roleplaying games - it's fanfiction, essentially. They declare themselves "dedicated to Expanded Arda, non-canonical sub-creation within J. R. R. Tolkien's World of Arda". I wouldn't trust anything I found on that site.
I agree with Elthir on the battles. Turgon and the Gondolindrim weren't at the Dagor Bragollach, and hence Glorfindel and Ecthelion wouldn't have been either.
Since it's reasonable to imagine that Turgon's host would have followed his father's host quite closely, I think it very plausible that Glorfindel and Ecthelion could have fought at Lammoth and the Dagor Aglareb.
 
Possibly yes about Dagor Aglareb , but only possibly. After all, chances were that they might not get promoted into high rank officers yet. The command was still in Fingolfin's hands during Dagor Aglareb. During Dagor Bagollach, Gondolin wasn't among the frontal military operation against Morgoth obviously, after all, the elves wouldn't need to send max combat personnel in such long period consuming siege due to economic reasons, in particular those states almost the most distant from Angaband, no sources mentioned any high rank officers took part either. Even if both these 2 big guys took part into frontal combat of Dagor Bagollach, who should take charge to make the Gondolin's War machine work?Don't forget, these 2 big guys were the 1st office of main ministers of Gondolin domestic stuff.
 
The New Notion Club archives is fan-made materials for roleplaying games - it's fanfiction, essentially. They declare themselves "dedicated to Expanded Arda, non-canonical sub-creation within J. R. R. Tolkien's World of Arda". I wouldn't trust anything I found on that site.
I agree with Elthir on the battles. Turgon and the Gondolindrim weren't at the Dagor Bragollach, and hence Glorfindel and Ecthelion wouldn't have been either.
Since it's reasonable to imagine that Turgon's host would have followed his father's host quite closely, I think it very plausible that Glorfindel and Ecthelion could have fought at Lammoth and the Dagor Aglareb.
So are there any middle earth books in which ecthelion and glorfindel took part in the battle of dagor aglareb and battle of lammoth?
 
Anyway, my answer is: as of today and as far as I know, there are no Tolkien-written texts in which Ecthelion or Glorfindel are mentioned in either of these battles.

We don't get a ton of detail with respect to either battle in any case, but we know Argon fought at Lammoth for example, because he was slain there.
 
Anyway, my answer is: as of today and as far as I know, there are no Tolkien-written texts in which Ecthelion or Glorfindel are mentioned in either of these battles.

We don't get a ton of detail with respect to either battle in any case, but we know Argon fought at Lammoth for example, because he was slain there.
So how could these elves be commanders? Are there any chances that they fought in the wars I mentioned?
 
( . . . ) Are there any chances that they fought in the wars I mentioned?

I think this much has already been answered by two "possibles" and one "plausible" :)

For example, did Fingon fight at the Kinslaying? According to The Annals of Aman and Christopher Tolkien's constructed Silmarillion (warning: mutliple f-sounds follow), the Feanoreans were succoured by Fingon with the foremost of Fingolfin's host . . .

. . . so, presumably yes. In any case Fingon was there . . .

. . . but then there's a text in Tolkien's Quenta Silmarillion, section 72, in which it it explicitly said that Fingon "had no part in that deed" (which writing, in any case, preceded AAM). The point here is not about the external textual situation actually . . .

. . . but its illustration of folks who were arguably somewhere -- some-where where-some fight or battle took place -- that yet need not have taken part in a given battle.

Or something ;)
 
I think this much has already been answered by two "possibles" and one "plausible" :)

For example, did Fingon fight at the Kinslaying? According to The Annals of Aman and Christopher Tolkien's constructed Silmarillion (warning: mutliple f-sounds follow), the Feanoreans were succoured by Fingon with the foremost of Fingolfin's host . . .

. . . so, presumably yes. In any case Fingon was there . . .

. . . but then there's a text in Tolkien's Quenta Silmarillion, section 72, in which it it explicitly said that Fingon "had no part in that deed" (which writing, in any case, preceded AAM). The point here is not about the external textual situation actually . . .

. . . but its illustration of folks who were arguably somewhere -- some-where where-some fight or battle took place -- that yet need not have taken part in a given battle.

Or something ;)
So if the film of silmarillion comes out, will glorfindel and ecthelion fight in battle of lammoth and dagor aglareb?
 
As for the Dagor Aglareb, there are some reasonable assumptions that can be made. Fingolfin’s forces of course fought, so we can reasonably assume Turgon’s involvement. If we can assume that, we can assume Glorfindel and Ecthelion.

Possibly yes about Dagor Aglareb , but only possibly. After all, chances were that they might not get promoted into high rank officers yet. The command was still in Fingolfin's hands during Dagor Aglareb. During Dagor Bagollach, Gondolin wasn't among the frontal military operation against Morgoth obviously, after all, the elves wouldn't need to send max combat personnel in such long period consuming siege due to economic reasons, in particular those states almost the most distant from Angaband, no sources mentioned any high rank officers took part either. Even if both these 2 big guys took part into frontal combat of Dagor Bagollach, who should take charge to make the Gondolin's War machine work?Don't forget, these 2 big guys were the 1st office of main ministers of Gondolin domestic stuff.
At the time of the Dagor Aglareb, Gondolin did not yet exist and Turgon was at Vinyamar.
 
In the Quenta Silmarillion as Tolkien himself wrote it (see The Lost Road And Other Writings, and for later emendations, The War of the Jewels), JRRT describes the wanderings of Felagund and Turgon, noting that Turgon went alone into hidden places, found the secret vale and returned to Nivrost.
And the very next paragraph begins:

(QS section 102) "And even while Turgon and Felagund were wandering abroad, Morgoth . . ."
made trial of the Noldor's strength and starts what became known as the Dagor Aglareb. So. Does this at least possibly mean that the Dagor Aglareb battle started, and maybe ended, while Turgon was still wandering?

Hmm.

But here we have the Annals too, and especially the Grey Annals, which illustrates that in SY 53 Turgon found the hidden vale, and that the Daglor Aglareb began in SY 60, which is notably later of course.

And for the constructed Silmarillion, Christopher Tolkien chose the introduction of the Dagor Aglareb from the Grey Annals, not from JRRT's Quenta Simarillion. The Grey Annals begins rather: "Here Morgoth, believing the reports of his spies that the lords of the Eldar were wandering abroad with little thought of war . . ."

So what's the point of this post? What does it add? Nothing really. Although I've wondered for some time if JRRT meant to do "stuff" like this given the different traditions -- unless of course, I'm the only one who thinks QS (again taken by itself) at least raises the question of where Turgon might have been when this battle began.

In the Lay of Leithian for example, Maglor himself is also cast into the sea, while in QS he casts the Silmaril of course. Revision or "purposed inconsistency" between traditions?

I don't know 🐾
 
In the Quenta Silmarillion as Tolkien himself wrote it (see The Lost Road And Other Writings, and for later emendations, The War of the Jewels), JRRT describes the wanderings of Felagund and Turgon, noting that Turgon went alone into hidden places, found the secret vale and returned to Nivrost.
And the very next paragraph begins:

(QS section 102) "And even while Turgon and Felagund were wandering abroad, Morgoth . . ."
made trial of the Noldor's strength and starts what became known as the Dagor Aglareb. So. Does this at least possibly mean that the Dagor Aglareb battle started, and maybe ended, while Turgon was still wandering?

Hmm.

But here we have the Annals too, and especially the Grey Annals, which illustrates that in SY 53 Turgon found the hidden vale, and that the Daglor Aglareb began in SY 60, which is notably later of course.

And for the constructed Silmarillion, Christopher Tolkien chose the introduction of the Dagor Aglareb from the Grey Annals, not from JRRT's Quenta Simarillion. The Grey Annals begins rather: "Here Morgoth, believing the reports of his spies that the lords of the Eldar were wandering abroad with little thought of war . . ."

So what's the point of this post? What does it add? Nothing really. Although I've wondered for some time if JRRT meant to do "stuff" like this given the different traditions -- unless of course, I'm the only one who thinks QS (again taken by itself) at least raises the question of where Turgon might have been when this battle began.

In the Lay of Leithian for example, Maglor himself is also cast into the sea, while in QS he casts the Silmaril of course. Revision or "purposed inconsistency" between traditions?

I don't know 🐾
Indeed, all fair points. Turgon though spent many years planning and building Gondolin in secret and if I recall if was FA 116 that the people moved their from Vinyamar and the realm started in earnest.
 
Indeed, all fair points. Turgon though spent many years planning and building Gondolin in secret and if I recall if was FA 116 that the people moved their from Vinyamar and the realm started in earnest.

Why Turgon "though" . . . I'm not sure what this is in response to specifically (from my post).

🐾
 

Similar threads

Back
Top