Annatar
Lord of Gifts
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2021
- Messages
- 586
This thread is supposed to be about everything related to geography.
Specifically, I'd first like to talk about lakes in Middle-earth. I've noticed that (in the real world) there are usually a lot of lakes along the edges of mountain ranges. These are usually the results of past glaciers. Just look at the Alps, for example. Tolkien described several lakes in his works, but in comparison there are rather few, especially if you include the official maps. In the maps, you seem to see individual mountains and forests, but hardly any lakes. Of course it would be quite possible that only those lakes are drawn on the map that have a certain (very large) minimum size or are also relevant in the stories. If it were not a matter of pure relevance, I'd expect, for example, many more lakes of about the size of Mirrormere or larger on the official maps, depending on the resolution. In any case, I think that Tolkien had acquired some basic knowledge of geography. In addition, he has traveled (at least) the Swiss Alps and therefore should have known that there are usually many lakes between and especially near the mountains.
How do you see that and how big do you think Mirrormere is roughly?
In my opinion, the Long Lake must be at least as big as Lake Constance, but probably even bigger.
Do you think that every drawn mountain in the standard map corresponds to one mountain or rather a mountain range or ridges that belong together?
In the case of trees, it is clear that one drawn tree corresponds to a plurality. With mountains, however, this may be different, since they also look quite individual in parts. On the other hand, if you look at the scale, a drawn mountain must actually be more than one.
Specifically, I'd first like to talk about lakes in Middle-earth. I've noticed that (in the real world) there are usually a lot of lakes along the edges of mountain ranges. These are usually the results of past glaciers. Just look at the Alps, for example. Tolkien described several lakes in his works, but in comparison there are rather few, especially if you include the official maps. In the maps, you seem to see individual mountains and forests, but hardly any lakes. Of course it would be quite possible that only those lakes are drawn on the map that have a certain (very large) minimum size or are also relevant in the stories. If it were not a matter of pure relevance, I'd expect, for example, many more lakes of about the size of Mirrormere or larger on the official maps, depending on the resolution. In any case, I think that Tolkien had acquired some basic knowledge of geography. In addition, he has traveled (at least) the Swiss Alps and therefore should have known that there are usually many lakes between and especially near the mountains.
How do you see that and how big do you think Mirrormere is roughly?
In my opinion, the Long Lake must be at least as big as Lake Constance, but probably even bigger.
Do you think that every drawn mountain in the standard map corresponds to one mountain or rather a mountain range or ridges that belong together?
In the case of trees, it is clear that one drawn tree corresponds to a plurality. With mountains, however, this may be different, since they also look quite individual in parts. On the other hand, if you look at the scale, a drawn mountain must actually be more than one.
Last edited:



