• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Leaving the Barrow Downs

  • Thread starter Deleted member 12094
  • Start date
I think Byzantium was more powerful than we northern and western Europeans care to recall. Its army used the first mounted armored knights, the cataphracts, was commanded in distinct army units, the themata, which at least superficially resemble Gondor’s regional levies, paid for by regional commanders (Forlong of Lossarnach or the Lord of Dol Amroth), backed by a small but professional army that resembles the Byzantine tagma. We recall such incidents as the Fourth Crusade, where under the direction of the blind Doge of Venice, Enrico Dandolo, the Crusaders sacked Constantinople, from which the Byzantine Empire never recovered. We think this means the Crusaders were stronger: I don’t believe that’s the case: I believe they attacked their allies, took advantage that the far-flung armies of Byzantium were all deployed along the front lines, and destroyed the effective seat of Christendom.

Powerful kingdoms emerged from the breakup of Charlemagne’s empire, as already noted. After the rise of France under Charles the Bald, Germany arose under Holy Roman Emperor Otto I the Great. Despite many changes over the centuries, these two nations still exist – and until recently (still within living memory!) contested “the bowling alley” that separates them.

But weak, divided kingdoms mark the history of Britain until William the Conqueror. The Britons fought among themselves after the departure of the Romans: Vortigern infamously invited Hengist and Horsa to fight for him so that he might overcome his rivals among the Britons: it proved not only his undoing, but “the Ruin of Britain”. The native Britons – we should say Romano-Britons, for Emperor Constantine the Great was born in the Imperial city of Eboracum, modern-day York¸ were never able to unite themselves to drive out the Anglo-Saxon invaders (with the possible exception of unification under King Arthur and his victory over the Saxons at Mount Baden). One by one, the Brittonic kingdoms fell: Rhegin, Ynys Weith, Caer Colun, Deifr, Gwent, Caer Lundein (London), Pengwern, Novant; and finally Rheged, Gododdin, Cait, Dumnonia, Ystrad Clud (Strathclyde), and last of all Gwynedd and Powys (together, Wales).

Nor were the Anglo-Saxons immune to such civil wars that weakened them against invaders: Viking invasions saw the fall of Kent, Essex, East Anglia, Northumbria, Sussex, and Merica. Only Alfred the Great stemmed the overwhelming tide of the Norsemen, his grandson Æthelstan the Glorious finally decisively defeating the Vikings and uniting the Anglo-Saxons to become the first true King of England. And by the way, Æthelstan is Anglo-Saxon for “noble stone”, reminiscent of Aragorn’s regnal name, Elessar: “Elf stone”. And Offa’s Dike famously divides Wales from Mercia – and modern England. That border, defined by “a deep dike with a steep wall on the further side” very much as Tolkien describes the border of Arthedain and Cardolan, is more than 1200 years old.

And this without reference to the nearly continuous internecine civil wars of the Irish and Scots, which brought ruin, death, and misery to nobles and common folk alike.

There is also the example of the Visigoths, whose kingdom was lost to the marauding Moslem Saracens because of endless court intrigue, civil war, and familial murder. Medieval France also suffered division and civil war; but for the intervention of Joan of Arc, Charles VII would never have come to the throne, and but for his madness (inherited perhaps from his French grandfather, Charles VI Valois King of France), Henry VI of England might well have been king of both England and France.

The history of the British Isles shows no lack of ruinous insular warfare that invites invaders to trample and conquer its inhabitants.

Reinheitsgebot, “purity order,” to make certain the beer was not contaminated. “Barley, hops, and water.” That’s it. I understand the list of permissible ingredients has grown considerably, but that there is a movement to rescind the Reinheitsgebot altogether: is this so?

Before twentieth-century Prohibition in the United States, alcohol consumption was much higher than today. We have lists of the consumption of alcohol for the colonial delegates to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia (because this was paid for out of “government” funds), where the Declaration of Independence was drafted and signed and from which the American Revolution was waged politically, and from what I understand, by modern standards, everyone there was smashed out of his gourd.
 
People in the 18th century drank indeed, and not just in America; water was -- justifiably, in many cases -- suspect. Beer, ale, cider, were considered safer.

BTW -- there's evidence that alcohol consumption -- legal and illegal -- increased during prohibition, but I won't go any further off topic.
 
OK.

First, I'm certain that my OT babbling on beer, quoting Alcuin's post, and my even more extensive babbling on Charlemagne etc., quoting S-eS's post, were separate posts before my wife and I did some shopping. Some Internet (or site) gremlins at work??? 🤨

I'm certainly not suggesting one-to-one parallel either, that's why I mentioned anything of the sort breaking down pretty quickly. But JRRT more than once mentioned that what one learns over years and decades does not always (most likely seldom?) survive intact. He used the term "mulch of the mind" or something similar how things quite buried in an author's mind might bubble up, maybe even be thought of by the author as halfway original. Then a really determined and dogged researcher might track down links that the author had long forgotten. I think there's another term for things like this, "mental furniture", and old furniture stored in an attic and no longer in daily use comes even closer.

Everyday sayings in the west about whose original source hardly anyone is aware of anymore abound. The unchallenged number one source remains the Bible, in both of my mother tongues, German and English. In German, silver medal probably goes to Goethe (with Schiller not far behind). In English, The Bard rules as undisputed native champion - except for in that former colony, where Samuel Langhorne Clemens now gets blamed for almost every such thing. Dumas (father and son) for France? Cervantes for Spain? Dante and Boccaccio for Italy? Everybody's mulch is different.
 
Some Internet (or site) gremlins at work???

“A worthy man, but his memory is like a lumber-roam: thing wanted always buried.”
 
An unusual source for why alcohol consumption (though at seriously lower content percentages) was so wide-spread may be found in the books by Paul C. Doherty, known in Germany only by his pen name Paul Harding, under which all German translations were published. One centers on the figure of the Lord guardian of the royal seal (if I got that back translation right), Sir Hugh Corbett, starting late in the reign of Edward I of England, but in the English original which has not been translated into German anymore has continued to this day into the reign of his son Edward II, latest book published 2019 (on the authority of a member of another JRRT site who has read all. The second series starts at the death of E I's grandson (and E II's son) Edwards III, leaving his grandson Richard II, son of his "predeceased" heir Edward the Black Prince (who would have bee IV, but never made it), starring a Benedictine ordained monk name Athelstan and the coroner of the city of London, on Sir John Cranston.

What was the problem then, and for several centuries after the 14th that these novels are placed in?

Missing sewers. Something the Romans had in Rome (that "cloaca maxima" and tributaries), probably going back to the times of the Etruscan overlordship around 800 BC, and never mind the Harappa culture who had stuff like that even 1800 years before that. If memory serves, no city in the world was able to sustain its population without a constant stream of immigrants from outside the city limits until the early 20th century. We are definitely talking about New York, London, Paris, Berlin and the like here. Cesspits seeping into the water supply of wells (here we're additionally missing the complementary pipes to those getting the yucky stuff out of the cities, those getting clean water in - again something the Romans had solved with all of those aqueducts they built all over parts of Europe) killed seriously enough inhabitants per year - cholera would be the main suspect here - to make the best efforts of the inhabitants to emulate the Shire's seven-time mayor Sam and his Rose insufficient to maintain population levels. Of course these drinking-water supply and waste-removal disposal efforts cost money …
 
One of my good friends is a well-educated plumber. He and I have often laughed because the mark of “high civilization” in archeology is plumbing. (He always adds that, “The difference between professional and amateur plumbing is venting.”) By this measure, London was not a “high civilization” until about the 1850s, but Knossos was.
 
First, a very definite thank-you for a reminiscence with my second-favorite cartoon character Bugs (Daffy gets honorable mention). Road Runner is the unchallenged champion.
Second, either I have seen exactly this cartoon at some time when I was in the US - or they recycled the "ran-out-of-gas" gag in a later one.
Third, in severe contrast to all later (post-WW II) cartoons, it is Bugs who takes the abuse - HERESY!! APOSTASY!!!
(I thought I had a fourth point; apparently not … 🤔 )
 
One of my good friends is a well-educated plumber...
You have quite a talent of stirring up things in my "mulch", Alcuin. I'll leave the "is this a good thing" judgement to other members.

Dilbert.

Meeting his "sanitation man" at his (Dilbert's) garbage can where the sanitation man is quizzically looking at a gadget that Dilbert has thrown away in frustration. (The question "why is Dilbert hanging around his garbage can when the local service authorities have decided it is time for its transfer to disposal vehicles" is irrelevant. Jokes don't work that way!!!)

The sanitation man suggests that with some refinements, Dilbert's gadget might actually work.

Dilbert, stunned and not amused (the suggestions must have made sense to him) asks the sanitation man "why are you working in sanitation???"
Man replies "I think the more relevant question is why are you working in engineering?"
 
...
And just for you:


Where is that ditch to Arthedain? And where did those standing stones go?
Ah, OK. I do have ten Dilbert compilation books, plus two of Adams's Dilbert-related books, so that's a lot of mulch.
(OT to OT. This is very strange. My last Dilbert compilation (in the original) is from 2000. My last Garfield (German translation) from the original German publisher is from 1999; a new publisher restarted, my oldest book (slight overlap with the original publisher) by them is from 2011, but covers roughly the strips from the first nine months of 1997. The last book by Paul C. Doherty to be translated into German is from 1999, from the Athelstan series (of the Hugh Corbett series, only volumes 5-10 of 18 were ever translated, latest 1996). What is going on here?!? For the comic strips, I have a vague memory of a sudden Manga craze, which seemed to push almost everything else off the shelves; a reason that I rarely, and when almost always briefly and cursorily, check out the comics section of the bookstores I frequent. It's not that I haven't looked, or even asked the people working in the bookstores …)

Ditch. Well, ditches can disappear from people dumping stuff in them that should not be dumped there …
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…