Fanfare for the Flattener of Finwe!
Bravo for
Bauglir's Battle-Banger!
"Greetings" to Grond, who best makes the case that we're really graced with a conundrum re these
Ithryn Luin: beyond the differences in the two pairs of names for them given, the separation in time for their arrival in
Middle-earth is fully an Age of the world! My own sense of which version to prefer or hold more reliable leans toward accepting & affirming the POME account on general principle as being the later, all else being equal; the consideration of coherence within the larger published context, which (necessarily) led Christopher to certain editorial decisions regarding
The Silmarillion and his father's hopeful but very late intention to recast it substantially, seems less important in this case, as both these answers to the
riddle of the
Blue Wizards are brief, self-contained, and fairly fragmentary. I rather get the feeling from the
Letters that there were quite a number of questions about the myriad details of Middle-earth which hadn't made much particular claim on their sub-Creator's attention until prompted by the inquiry of his admiring readers.
To put forward two fairly well-known examples in support of the point, the fact that John Ronald freely admitted knowing no better than the
hobbits did themselves just who
Strider was when first they met him in
Bree, and that the noble Ringbearer who shares an equinoctial birthday with his uncle
Bilbo on Sunday (it presently being the small hours of Saturday morning as I ramble thus garrulous) was named "Bingo" [!!] for some goodly while in the early stages of LOTR's evolution, clearly illustrates the
revelatory nature of
Tolkien's working method for Tale-making: not "making stuff up" but rather exploring, excavating like an archaeologist with tools narrative, intuitive, and primarily linguistic to uncover and reconstruct the true
history of Arda, delving ever deeper over time to find the
mithril lying hidden.
The first account, from 1958, reflects IMHO a relatively low level of speculative energy brought to bear on this matter of "the other two"; we do know that JRRT had a lot else on his mind in that decade, nearly the first half of which was consumed with the considerable struggle just to get LOTR into print! (Which difficulty truly seems astonishing in retrospect, doesn't it? Like those other British recording companies who decided to pass on the chance to put the Beatles under contract...) Among the sharpest pangs I felt as a sophomore in college that day in early September twenty-nine summers ago when I heard Tolkien had died was that now I would never have the chance to send him the letter I'd been drafting in my head since freshman year in high school, to offer my sincerest rune-enhanced adulation and inquire eagerly after whatever more might be known of the unnamed
Istari. I never did write to ask, alas, but dozens if not hundreds of others must have; and the later account presented in HOME XII seems to me the product of a more sustained (and substantially more positive, if still quite undeveloped) attention to the question.
A useful focus for our own "archaeological" and discursive energies on the subject might be the linguistic resonance and implications of the two pairs of names: the earlier
Alatar and
Pallando sound a different note in my semi-discerning ear for
Elvish echoes than the later appellations of
Morinehtar and
Romestamo, the latter of which seems especially redolent of
Orome. Certainly "Darkness-slayer and East-helper" offer greater possibilities for speculation on subsequent subtle or indirect influence, and it makes me happier to think that the
Valar had a better day at the plate than to go only one for five in their emissary-sending...