• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

👁️Sauron and Melkor...

Melian's influence only strengthened the realm of Doriath and made the inhabitants wiser. To assume that Melian's influence elevated the Doriath elves to the same level as the Aman elves would be blowing it way out of proportion. I think an Elf who hasn't lived in the Blessed Realm would not have been able to defeat a Balrog.

But then again, we have Sauron being defeated by a Númenorean and a Noldo... Is Gil-Galad considered a High-elf? He has not been to Aman, but his predecessors have. Anyway, these are two mighty people. We never see just one individual (that is not an Elf of Aman or an Ainu) defeating a Maia or a Vala.
 
Is Gil-Galad considered a High-elf? He has not been to Aman, but his predecessors have.

Well, we don't really know that for sure, do we?

I suspect Gil-Galad was born in M-E after the Noldor returned.
After the 4th Battle, The Silm says 'Fingon sent his young son Gil-Galad to the Havens.'

Being as this was over 400 years since the return of the Noldor, it's a safe bet to assume that Gil-Galad was born here.

Or is it?
In UT, in The Narn I Hin Hurin, Sabor Labadel states that Elvish & Mannish children are alike, but 'the children of Men grow more quickly & their youth passes soon.'

So, who's to say it doesn't take 500 or even 1000 years for an Elf to not be considered 'young' or be mature?



Is Gil-Galad considered a High Elf?

Sounds like a question I've often wondered & the beginning of a new thread......
 
Originally posted by Bucky
So, who's to say it doesn't take 500 or even 1000 years for an Elf to not be considered 'young' or be mature?
'Laws and Customs among the Eldar' says 50 and 'Myths Transformed' 3000 years, take your pick. ;)
 
In The Parentage of Gil-galad in HoME XII, it is told that Gil-galad's mother was a Sinda. That according to final word which is that Gil-galad was the Son of Orodreth. So here his mother was not a High elf, neither was Gil-galad born in Aman. Of course you guys could stick with the version of Fingon being his father.
 
Originally posted by Bucky
As for Men vs Balrogs, the fact that it wasn't Men but always High Elves fighting balrogs should tell you something.

Could a Numenorean defeat a Elf, Sindar or Noldor in battle?
I'd bet it was possible.

But fighting a balrog isn't just who's the better fighter.
I don't see any Sindar fighting balrogs either, just Noldor.

An Edainic warrior from House of Hador, Túrin Turambar by his name, slew Glaurung the Golden, father of Dragons, who was stronger than Balrogs since he spearheaded their assaults.

Originally posted by Bucky Read the first 2 statements I made. We DO know something: They were less than the High Elves.
Sindar = Dark Elves. High Elves = Calaquendi.
Case closed there.

Dead wrong.

Sindar=Grey-Elves
Calaquendi=High-Elves(Vanyar, Noldor & Teleri)
Avari=Dark-Elves(Silvan?)

~Nautilus
 
In fact, Tolkien DOES say that......

The Sil:

'...the Elves had a greater wisdom, and skill & beauty; and those who had dwelt in Valinor and looked upon the Powers as much surpassed the Dark Elves in these things as they in turn surpassed the people of mortal race. Only in the realm of Doriath...did the Sindar come near to match the Calaquendi....'

It talks about skill and beauty and wisdom, not physical power while what I am saying is that some of the Best Sindar warriors would have been a good match for the Noldor and consequently for the Balrogs. It may be that you take 'power' in someother meaning, but power to me means physical strength and the Elves of Doriath had plenty of that.


Did Gandalf beat Durin's Bane by mere 'warrior' strength?
The battle on The Bridge Of Khazad-Dum is a confrontation of 'magical' power, just as is the spell confrontation in the Chamber Of Mazarbul.

I would ask what 'magic' did Ecthelion used when he fought the Balrog in Gondolin?
Do you think the Valinorean elves would possess magic?

That's not what Gandalf said.


After reading the book, I was perhaps under the allusion that those were Gandalf's words but perhaps you have a better source to cite from then the book.

You, Beleg, keep saying 'undead'. Tolkien & I keep saying 'Unseen'.
Since Tolkien makes the statement that there is a 'seen ' realm & an 'unseen' realm,

I believe that the concept of Undead is there in Tolkien's world.
So passed the sword of the Barrow-downs, work of Westernesse. But glad would he have been to know its fate who wrought it slowly long ago in the North-kingdom when the Dúnedain were young, and chief among their foes was the dread realm of Angmar and its sorcerer king. No other blade, not though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.

That's talking about the witchking, who is a Ringwraith. Therefore the word undead has been used in cotext with the living of the Ringwraiths. It can be further justified by the fact that Ringwraiths couldn't die as long as their rings or the One ring lived; that itself would warrant enough authority to place them among the undead. Besdies Tolkien himself says that, you can't argue with it.
With regard to that I believe your whole issue concerning the unseen and the seen becomes irrelevant.

On the otherhand I never read Balrogs been called Undead...
There is an inherent different between Balrogs and Ringwrairths, Ringwraiths are the undead while Balrogs are spirits of fires, Maia who have taken a corporeal shape.

Read the first 2 statements I made. We DO know something: They were less than the High Elves.
Sindar = Dark Elves. High Elves = Calaquendi.
Case closed there.

No we still don't know.
Sindar are not Dark Elves, besides read my first statements.
Only the Avari are dark Elves.


The Lord Of The Nazgul, aka 'Number One', was killed without either of those things happening, now wasn't he?
I present the Quote of his 'supposed' killing,

But suddenly he too stumbled forward with a cry of bitter pain, and his stroke went wide, driving into the ground. Merry’s sword had stabbed him from behind, shearing through the black mantle, and passing up beneath the hauberk had pierced the sinew behind his mighty knee.
‘Eowyn! eowyn!’ cried Merry. Then tottering, struggling up, with her last strength she drove her sword between crown and mantle, as the great shoulders bowed before her. The sword broke sparkling into many shards. The crown rolled away with a clang. eowyn fell forward upon her fallen foe. But lo! the mantle and hauberk were empty. Shapeless they lay now on the ground, torn and tumbled; and a cry went up into the shuddering air, and faded to a shrill wailing, passing with the wind, a voice bodiless and thin that died, and was swallowed up, and was never heard again in that age of this world.

It never says he 'died', just that he was never heard in that age of this world. This death could very well be like the death they suffered at the Fords of Bruinen.
I say this because I can't understand how the Ringwraiths could have died wihtout their rings being destroyed since they were bound by their rings.

My point is clear.
A Sindarin Elf would not be physically, that is taking into propotion, pure physical strength, a great deal below the Noldor and some of the most agilest might overpass them.
Saying that, some of the cheif Lords of Sindar, like Beleg would have been able to fight a Balrog.
 
It talks about skill and beauty and wisdom, not physical power

What kind of skill?
That's a wide term & could certainly include battle skill.

Still, my main point, & I'm holding to it is that it isn't a strictly warrior vs. warrior battle when an Elf faced a Balrog.

You ask me for proof but provide none to counter my arguement that fighting a balrog was a 'magical' (broad term, ask Galadriel) confrontation as well as a physical one with weapons.

There is NO evidence either way in either Ectellion or Glorfindel's battle.
But, there is in Gandalf's. Read the accounts & tell me there wasn't a 'magical' confrontation taking place in the Chamber Of Mazarbul or on The Bridge Of Khazad-Dum.

And, as for 'Undead', yes it is a proper term for the Nazgul.
But so is 'Unseen'.
And 'Seen' is a proper term that is the opposite of 'unseen'. Everything has to be one, the other or both.
Since Maiar could walk clad or unclad, they obviously could exist in either the 'Seen' or 'Unseen'.
It's already been established that High Elves had a power over both realms.
So, I stick to my guns in saying that High Elves had a battle advantage vs. balrogs that the Sindar would not.
 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top