I wouldn't wish to rush you, but are the tea and cakes ready yet?Good grief, I'm just stumbling onto this thread for the first time.
I'll give it a read. Will be awhile. I'll also be printing it all out so I can read it at a 'convenient time' in a 'convenient setting'. (With some tea and cakes.)
I'll get back to it and give it some comments when I'm done.
I fear I spilled the tea and burnt the cakes..!! Thank you for reminding me I need to try again.are the tea and cakes ready yet?
I may need to go back and re-read my own story to be certain of what you're refering to. And possibly re-research it myself for the source. But I think I know what it is - possibly uses of; "thee, thou, etc"? It's been awhile, and the rust and cobwebs are forming obstacles - but I believe I found reference to this in a footnote of an Unfinished Tales story, and tried to apply it here. I'm not certain which story at the moment, though it almost certainly was one involving Numenoreans or the Dunedain.In addition @Valandil, I want to express my unbounded thanks on one point - a particular use of a particular archaic form you've chosen, I determined to go back and research in more depth etymologically (and philologically).
I find in spite of my initial belief, there may well be some justification for its use in the way you have applied it, particularly with reference to a 'much older history' than the traditional thinking applies to it.
Therefore, I have changed my initial impression of its POSSIBILITY of choice and application - though I will need to review each to be sure of its precision, as well as do a little more study to be sure I have solidified the 'revised ground upon which I now (can most likely) stand' with regard to it.
(Again, I withhold the specifics publicly - in this case, just at the present time, though at some point when the ground is concrete rather than quicksand, I may speak to it in more depth.)
Oh how I love language.
Thank you for the comments. I’m not sure I was so tuned in to the distinction, nor if I realized the proper use of ‘ye’. I’ll try to find out more.The thees and thous didn't strike me as too much out of place.
it was the 'ye' applications, which is the form used generally only in PLURAL application - but at a couple points, it has been used when its reference is to the singular Eldacar. (So immediately striking me as 'out of place.')
However, etymologically and philogically, there HAVE been applications of the 'ye' to the singular in certain instances, when the expression is intended as one of 'formality' or 'recognition of place.' (Philogically, there may be other instances too - it's a little harder to follow.)
I can't say yet whether 'ye' would apply "father to son" as in the cases you have used it here - even if the 'target' of the 'ye' is a prince - give the father is the King - so familiarity and position both would suggest "thee or thou" - the singular form - rather than 'thee' - but more study is needed.
there is also one case where you have applied "you" in the conversation, followed shortly thereafter by 'ye' (or "thee" I don't recall.)
So the conclusions currently are: 1. Ther is a slight inconsistency in application of "you", "thee" and "ye" and 2. more research is still needed for me to be settled about the "ye" use... but there is a likelihood there is proper application of it, if I can drill down and clearly define the cases accurately so I can correctly, historically, apply them. (The distinctions were largely gone by the Old English, 'ye' being nearly always plural, and were certianly gone by the Middle English.)
I'll shut up now.
I have located this, and duly added it to my list of things to peruse.recommend my own "Visitors Come to Court"?
I will humbly listen to any suggestions. I’m sure all my writings could use an editorial review by a second set of eyes. All the better if they’re experienced.I have located this, and duly added it to my list of things to peruse.
Please do pardon an aging Ent for his nit-picking at the 'older applications of the language.' While I'm no master myself, I have spent a small deal of time in it, and as with the abominable word "that" so frequently misapplied, (and we won't speak of the "useless 'do'" and its partners,) I find an overabundance of the 'misuse' of the former English forms can chap my bark just a bit.
There was a time here when we had a whole troop making daily (mis)use of the older applications in their regular discussions - I was thankful I had an ample supply of sap salve on hand to keep my bark somewhat supple, or I would have lost entire sections. I did end up with a few new knots..!
It is not 'required' to do so.Are we supposed to put discussion in a different thread?
Alright. Since these stories are "finished" (for now), it's nice to have the discussion right here in the same thread. Then I get notifications when there's a comment. Plus - other members have noticed that new comments come in and I think have begun reading the stories.It is not 'required' to do so.
However, those who want their writing posts to just be their writing posts, unencumbered,, do set up a 'discussion thread' for "the rest of the story."
It can be helpful. Especially if a link is imbedded in each to allow switching back and forth between the "story post" and the "discussion thread" etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?