It's nothing quite so sinister. Amaz*n is trying to use the popularity of LotR for financial gain, to make Amaz*n's shareholders a shed load of money, and they don't care whose legacy they trample on in order to do it. It's greed, pure and simple.
That is unlikely-- vanishing point unlikely.If anything, some passages will be censored and rewritten.
Yes, that version by Wolfgang Krege published in 2000 (and revised by the publishers in 2012). Apparently he also did something similar to his 1998 translation of "The Hobbit" - trying to be funnier than the original and geared more to a grownup readership, according to the critique.Something similar has already happened in Germany: There was a new, but very bad translation adapted to modern language. This has also caused a lot of discussion in the community. In the meantime, this version has been revised again, and the worst parts have been undone.
Annatar said: "I can't imagine that. If anything, some passages will be censored and rewritten."
Annatar said: "But what I find a bit strange is that Amazon has an absurdly high budget for the series. So why can't or won't they afford showrunners and writers who have already proven that they are really good and up to the task? These two hipsters JD Payne and P. McKay have never been able to prove that they are worthy for the realization of such an important material."
Thorin said: "Unlike LoTR and The Hobbit, there just isn't enough material we know about in the 2nd Age that would cause us to react too negatively to extra fluff that is put in there. My concern is that the stuff we DO know about will not be treated with respect to the source material. Hopefully what we know about Celebrimbor, Numenor and Sauron as it was in the 2nd age, will be treated with the sanctity it deserves.'
Not sure that it's a comforting thought to us book nerds, but PJ's LoTR trilogy of 2001-03 may have been the high point of Middle-earth filming, large screen or small.I was very critical of PJ's film version back in the day, but compared to this abomination, the old films seem downright masterpieces.
Don't forget Ralph Bakshi and his Butterfly-Balrog. 🦋Well, PJ cast the mold for making wholesale changes to Tolkien's work for the screen... and he had a complete story to make changes to.
As is known by now, personal memory can be highly selective ... 🤫In that case, don't forget Rankin-Bass Gollum.
I'm reminded of an old regional joke:I was very critical of PJ's film version back in the day, but compared to this abomination, the old films seem downright masterpieces.
That film-makers are faced with an almost impossible task in converting books to film does not surprise me - at least when the filming of a book series does not overlap with the writing of the books. This overlap was the case with J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, and with G.R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series, which got the title of Martin's first book of that series when brought to the (small) screen as "Game of Thrones" by HBO.It was the last point. The rest that come cannot even be considered Middle-earth. Just some ill-intentioned analogy.
Ummmmm ... meaning those other two preferred sitting around in the dark? Why am I not surprised ...I'm reminded of an old regional joke:
Q. How many Virginians does it take to change a light bulb?
A. Three. One to change the bulb, and two to talk about how much better the old one was.
By the sketches of recent private TV comedians, these jokes have not entirely died out here in Germany ...No, that's a Jewish mother joke.
"No, don't mind me, I'll just sit here in the dark".
That was aired here by a private TV channel (not sure how high or low in the hierarchy).Or here in the US, e.g. The Big Bang Theory.
Yeah, as far as visuals. I mean, Robin Hood Aragorn was laughable, but Bakshi didn't really hack the actual story, deleting core aspects while adding crap.Don't forget Ralph Bakshi and his Butterfly-Balrog. 🦋
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?