aragil said:
There is no opportunity for him to have seen the stumps before that scene.
Treebeard can
not see
Isengard or the
Orcs pouring out, and he certainly can not see the devastation of his forest- his view is obstructed by the
trees. Only the
Hobbits can see any of this- that is quite important. And, in a nice twist, while the Hobbits (esp.
Pippin) are clearly interested in looking at something near at hand, we are never shown what it is. We (as a naive audience) aren't shown the trees until Treebeard sees them.
Why not? It's supposed to be his job to look after the trees, so what does he do all day when he isn't carrying hobbits around?
Now we come to the question I was going to ask next: how did the HOBBITS know about all the felling if Treebeard didn't?
"Only the hobbits can see this - that is important" - Are you saying that they could see it from the rocky peak, but Treebeard couldn't?
<edited> I've checked the scene now and in fact I see that IS what you were getting at. I certainly hadn't noticed before that for a few seconds the hobbits climb above Treebeard's eyeline. I still didn't see that they were looking at something "near at hand" as well, though. So far, so good, but then nonsense creeps in again: there must have been gaps in the trees, or other vantage points, where Treebeard could have seen what the hobbits saw.
Now back to where I left off, as the rest still applies! <end of edit>
There's another question though: if they did know about the felling, why didn't they just tell him, and show him, from wherever they saw it? Why bother to think up a trick? He was happy enough to accept the silly explanation for going south; surely he'd have believed his ears, and eyes about a fact?!
To coin a new adage for Pippin: the more you think about it the sillier it gets.
Added to Aldanil's reflections below, these questions blow the whole ent story apart.
Aldanil said:
PJ's inferior and needless revision: first, that....the Entmoot, after....debating all the observations of devastation and damage that the many Shepherds of the Trees would surely have made, should then decide not to bother; second....that Treebeard....should be immediately joined....by the entire host of the angry Onodrim....
....the drowning of Isengard is perhaps the fakiest-looking sequence....in a cinema trilogy deservedly lauded for great special effects.
Yes, those two are major incongruities in the thing, to add to any number of others, major and minor, including the smoke!
Others have said how great the Drowning is, and I've always thought they must have been watching a different film. To me it's bundles of sticks paddling in a big puddle. Two extreme views; at what level do you stand, on the gradient of its fakery?!
Greenwood said:
Who says
Saruman's interest in wheels and metal is a new thing?
You don't get wheels and metal without a lot of smoke - in Saruman's
technology -, so all three go together. Whenever the extra smoke started, Treebeard should have checked on his trees and found the devastation right from its beginning.
I agree this is "reaching", but we're "reaching" at a guy who makes a huge deal about the care he devotes to minute detail. Maybe he can't see the trees for the wood - do you have the adage that comes from?