WatcherWraith
Fairë Hyamië(Phantom of Prayer).
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2024
- Messages
- 858
You take it from an entity's first name, add water to what's left, and that gives you that entity's last name. But you can't say that name, it's not how they act.I have no idea, my friend. I don't even know what name to take "el" from, nor, oddly, what "el" means, whether it be that arrangement of letters, or the one letter making that particular sound.
It's very good advice.I thought there were some good points in this Instagram post: "What makes writing feel cheesy?"
I think the one I most strongly agree with is about the forced, on-the-nose moral statements. Nothing makes me cringe like lines such as, "The real treasure is the friends we made along the way!"
The points about overly elaborate prose were interesting to think about too. I guess I'd never really thought about it before, but sometimes overly detailed and/or formal sounding language can come across as cheesy. It's something worth watching out for, I think.
That's true, but I think this post is more talking about the narrative making forced on-the-nose moral statements. If it's in character for a certain character to say something like that, and even better, if it annoys other characters, I think we can all agree that's a different story than the author/narrator thinking this is a normal way to talk.But, to consider an opposing view, characters should talk in a way that's appropriate to them. A pedant is going to pedant, a bombast is going to bombast. They aren't going to notice (or care) if neither behavior is appropriate to the situation (unless they witness some other character doing it!)
These are good points, but I think they come back to a singular principle that should be applied at all times: Set vs payoff, (as well as exposition vs characterization, for smaller details).I thought there were some good points in this Instagram post: "What makes writing feel cheesy?"
I think the one I most strongly agree with is about the forced, on-the-nose moral statements. Nothing makes me cringe like lines such as, "The real treasure is the friends we made along the way!"
The points about overly elaborate prose were interesting to think about too. I guess I'd never really thought about it before, but sometimes overly detailed and/or formal sounding language can come across as cheesy. It's something worth watching out for, I think.
Completely agree! Tolkien played around with the contrast between higher speech, flowery and elegant, and lower speech, simple and blunt, for comedic effect as well as characterization.It's very good advice.
But, to consider an opposing view, characters should talk in a way that's appropriate to them. A pedant is going to pedant, a bombast is going to bombast. They aren't going to notice (or care) if neither behavior is appropriate to the situation (unless they witness some other character doing it!)
Someone that's blunt and direct will talk differently (or describe things differently in internal monologue) than a poet, or a diplomat, or a peasant, or a noble, etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?