Rivendell_librarian
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 772
I'm reading a fascinating book called Camelot and the Vision of Albion by Geoffrey Ashe. It's about an archaeological dig on Cadbury Hill in the UK in the late 60s. Many people came to visit showing the continuing fascination of the Arthurian legend. The author was the secretary of the project and gives much background to the legend. I've been struck by how much of this is new or relatively new to me. Bran, Lyonnesse (not potatoes!), Albion equated to the Titan Atlas, William Blake's mythology and much more.
it struck me that I was taught far more about classical mythology (I did Latin) than British or other northern mythologies. I googled GCSE mythology (UK school exam at 16) and was directed to a course on classical civilization. It could be that Welsh students are taught about the Mabinogion but I wondered what your experience is.
In one of his letters JRRT dismisses the idea of the return of Arthur (though didn't that mean he gave it enough credence to feel the need to dismiss it?). The Tudors (notably Henry VII) would argue that their coming to the throne was the fulfilment of this - that they had a much earlier claim to the throne going back centuries before the Norman invasion. And of course there is the Round Table in Winchester (once thought to be the site of Camelot) to prove it - with an outsize King Arthur who looks remarkably like Henry VIII ! Henry VII's oldest son was called Arthur. Prince Arthur was baptised in Winchester. Arthur is still a popular name in the current Royal Family, but not as a first name.
it struck me that I was taught far more about classical mythology (I did Latin) than British or other northern mythologies. I googled GCSE mythology (UK school exam at 16) and was directed to a course on classical civilization. It could be that Welsh students are taught about the Mabinogion but I wondered what your experience is.
In one of his letters JRRT dismisses the idea of the return of Arthur (though didn't that mean he gave it enough credence to feel the need to dismiss it?). The Tudors (notably Henry VII) would argue that their coming to the throne was the fulfilment of this - that they had a much earlier claim to the throne going back centuries before the Norman invasion. And of course there is the Round Table in Winchester (once thought to be the site of Camelot) to prove it - with an outsize King Arthur who looks remarkably like Henry VIII ! Henry VII's oldest son was called Arthur. Prince Arthur was baptised in Winchester. Arthur is still a popular name in the current Royal Family, but not as a first name.
