Barliman Butterbur
Worthy Keeper/Bree Roué
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2003
- Messages
- 2,762
Ithrynluin said:In FoTR, Chapter 1: A Long-expected Party, there is constant reference to Bilbo's alleged wealth, treasures he supposedly brought back from his journey to the Lonely Mountain. However, even though Bilbo gives out tons of gifts to everyone, there is not even a penny to be found among these items. Still, the majority of the hobbit population persists in their belief that there must be dozens of tunnels full of gems and gold in Bag End hill.
How much truth do you think there was to these rumours?
Élhendi said:...don't forget that Bilbo's real wealth was something neither himself nor any hobbit would realize: The Mithril coat.
Ah well, y'see, I happen to know it was Edward I that built Caernarvon Castle, for £22,000 - more than a years treasury income. You would have got away with it had Edward I's son, Edward II, not been known later as Edward Caernarvon, which suggests a connection with the castle. It was later believed Edward II was born there, but there's no contempory evidence to suggest it.Alcuin said:But consider this: Caernarvon Castle was completed in the early 1300s for about £22,000. So Bilbo had roughly the equivalent of 10 or 12 Caernarvon Castles. (Steven Muhlberger in the On-Line Reference Books for Medieval Studies says that, “Edward III, one of the richer monarchs of the time, had a normal yearly revenue of no more than £30,000 a year.” Edward III built Caernarvon Castle.)
I'm sorry, but I'm a history student and probably know too muchTake, for instance, the big, well-designed castles that Edward I built to control Wales. Just one of these, Caernarfon Castle, cost £20-25,000 between 1284 and 1330, when it was essentially finished. This is as if Canada had bought a small fleet of submarines, each of which cost 80 billion dollars. Caernarfon Castle was exceptional, but not unique.
How sloppy of me! You are correct.Wolfshead said:Ah well, y'see, I happen to know it was Edward I that built Caernarvon Castle, for £22,000 - more than a years treasury income. ... Indeed, your source even says it was Edward I.
Don't be.Wolfshead said:I'm sorry, but I'm a history student and probably know too much
Haha, I'm not really sorryAlcuin said:How sloppy of me! You are correct.
Don't be.
Good! So am I.Wolfshead said:I’m a pedant really...
This was the subject of my post no 6 above. Perhaps you missed it as I think you were posting at the same time.Alcuin said:Of course, the whole business of the gold from Smaug’s hoard overlooks what might have been salvaged from the trolls, which Aragorn and the hobbits found buried north of the road after Weathertop, doesn’t it?
Don't forget he gave the last of the "Smaug vintage" to Sam as a kind of early wedding present, even tho' this was long before Sam proposed to Rosie.From what I understand (or misunderstand), the money he brought back from adventures was so large, that he only needed very small percentage from it for living (maybe 2% to 5%), and the rest of the money he spent, over the years... giving it away, and helping other hobbits, and not asking anything back...
Right around his 111 birthday, and his departure to Rivendell, he pretty much spent it all (and this is what Frodo meant, I think).
I also I thought the Baggins' were landed gentry, as in "old money".I always assumed that Bilbo was a landowner and earned money through renting his land to farmers. He was living comfortably on something before he brought back any treasure.
Which Audio book if I may ask? I know of the one by Rob InglisI was recently listening to a Lord of the Rings audiobook that I found (side note: it's read by Phil Dragash and has Howard Shore's music from the trilogy, making it absolutely epic), and I found something that -- no matter how I spin it -- I cannot seem to explain. We are told throughout the book that "as Mr. Baggins was generous with his money, most people were willing to forgive him his oddities and his good fortune," and that "Mr. Bilbo is free with his money, and there seems no lack of it", and so forth, but there is never any explanation given as to where this money flows from. Later on in the book, when Merry asks Frodo how much is still left of the treasures Bilbo brought back from his adventures, Frodo replies that, "None at all... Bilbo gave it all away. He told me he did not feel it was really his, as it came from robbers."
So, my question is, where did the Baggins money come from?
Even if it weren't ---if it were, say, ingots--it could be bartered for money or goods.“Gold” and “silver” are often slang for money and are understood as such. In Spanish “dinero,” silver still means money. I assume the trills gold and silver WAS money.
A couple of quotes from "An Unexpected Party":I also I thought the Baggins' were landed gentry, as in "old money".
If that is true, he was already well-to-do.
He may not have even needed his land worked any longer to bring in money, or perhaps minimally so. .
That last meaning it even outdid anything in the Tooklands.Bungo, that was Bilbo's father, built the most luxurious hobbit-hole for her (and partly with her money) that was to be found either under the Hill or over the Hill or across the Water . . .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?