• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Why Hollywood would ❤️ Beren and 🧝Luthien

Ok... I'm going to say it here.... I think Morena Baccarin wold be a lovely Maiden of Harad
 
Yes. Lovely is the right word. And Haradrim are HAWT too, of course.

...

I don't know about dwarves and orcs, though. Probably hard to tell. Well, I guess it's the eye of the beholder thing again. Although I suspect that even an intelligent tree octopus of Epsilon Eridani would think "wow, what a nice specimen".
 
Last edited:
I truly hope there is never a Silmarillion movie, of any kind. If there is, someday, I won't watch it. I read these stories at an impressionable age, and they helped shape my imagination. I don't want the images in my head forever ruined.

Typical Hollywood movies always have some form of comic relief--usually a character who is kind of stupid or goofy. For the Hobbit movies, apparently Bilbo and the dwarves didn't provide enough comic relief for Peter Jackson and he had to create additional characters to fill that role (the reprehensible Alfred).

There is NO comic relief in the Silmarillion. None. It is a cycle of stories recounting the creation and existence of beauty beyond comprehension and its inevitable slide downward to decay and oblivion. Adding Alfred or someone/something like him to any of these stories would just make them irreparably trashy.

Further, part of the appeal and mystery of the Silmarillion is its relative brevity in terms of dialogue, action and description. This does a couple of things:

1. The archaic writing style elevates the story and the characters. They are hard to relate to on a personal level (not a bad thing in this case). They are distant, heroic and legendary. This book really isn't a novel, or at least it doesn't come across that way. This "remoteness" enhances the "myth" element, and the dramatic is expressed by the stories themselves rather more than the intense personal struggles we typically delve into in modern novels. The struggles of individuals in the Silmarillion are due to being caught up in vast forces largely beyond their control. A movie, to be popular and make money, will want to find a way to make the characters into people we can relate to in some way, make them more human.

2. The lack of descriptive detail of setting/character/dialogue also leave so much more room in the reader's head to imagine those details. Sometimes a character never fully seen can actually be enhanced this way. For example, in LOTR, we never REALLY see Sauron. We never see him to the extent Jackson elects to show him in the movies. In the book, there's this undefinable but terrifying presence, with who knows how much power, always lurking. In the movies, we have a weird eye on top of a tower. Sometimes movies show too much, and the effect is, unfortunately, reductive.

No Silmarillion movie, please!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…