Radaghast
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
- Messages
- 2,877
A question on Quora prompted me to look for a book-accurate rendering of Durin's Bane, and the movie version (whatever else one may think of it) is not it. No, the description is not very detailed but how much creative license is too much?
I've never cared for the movie version.
Those stupid horns that don't seem to serve any practical (offensive) function. Same for the silly little flapless wings that just sit on its back and generate smoke. Also, the fact that it doesn't seem to be very fast but can still just appear where it needs to be. Meh (at best).
Anyway, to review the book description:
Anyway, my Internet search yielded nothing remotely close to that description. Instead, I found depictions even more outlandish. The most infamous is probably that of the Ralph Bakshi film:
Just what in the unholy heck is this?
Somehow, though, I'm not sure that is the worst. I don't know how anyone could have read the book and come up with this:
This would not be out of place in a Rankin and Bass adaptation.
Then there's this one by the Bros. Hildebrandt.
More or less ridiculous than the one before (and is that a grass skirt it's wearing)? Better illustrated perhaps, but it's fairly ridiculous to my eyes. Whatever the case, I'm also concerned about the figures behind it. Is one mean to be an orc (the one that looks like a kobold) and the other a troll (looks rather like an evil dwarf)? Also, Gandalf doesn't look like he's smiting the bridge; he looks like more like he's shooting fire at it.
This one may be the worst I've seen yet (and I don't mean the quality of the illustration):
Honestly, six upper limbs? And none of the four arms are holding a sword 🤨😖
Anyone else have any "favorites"? Also, I'm wondering if anyone can pose any legit book-accurate renditions.
I've never cared for the movie version.
Those stupid horns that don't seem to serve any practical (offensive) function. Same for the silly little flapless wings that just sit on its back and generate smoke. Also, the fact that it doesn't seem to be very fast but can still just appear where it needs to be. Meh (at best).
Anyway, to review the book description:
If the description is vague, it's meant to be. The creature's features are difficult to see. It's shrouded in darkness, except for the flame, which does not illuminate it.The ranks of the orcs had opened, and they crowded away, as if they themselves were afraid. Something was coming up behind them. What it was could not be seen: it was like a great shadow, in the middle of which was a dark form, of man-shape maybe, yet greater; and a power and terror seemed to be in it and to go before it.
It came to the edge of the fire and the light faded as if a cloud had bent over it. Then with a rush it leaped across the fissure. The flames roared up to greet it, and wreathed about it; and a black smoke swirled in the air. Its streaming mane kindled, and blazed behind it. In its right hand was a blade like a stabbing tongue of fire; in its left it held a whip of many thongs.
Anyway, my Internet search yielded nothing remotely close to that description. Instead, I found depictions even more outlandish. The most infamous is probably that of the Ralph Bakshi film:
Just what in the unholy heck is this?
Somehow, though, I'm not sure that is the worst. I don't know how anyone could have read the book and come up with this:
This would not be out of place in a Rankin and Bass adaptation.
Then there's this one by the Bros. Hildebrandt.
More or less ridiculous than the one before (and is that a grass skirt it's wearing)? Better illustrated perhaps, but it's fairly ridiculous to my eyes. Whatever the case, I'm also concerned about the figures behind it. Is one mean to be an orc (the one that looks like a kobold) and the other a troll (looks rather like an evil dwarf)? Also, Gandalf doesn't look like he's smiting the bridge; he looks like more like he's shooting fire at it.
This one may be the worst I've seen yet (and I don't mean the quality of the illustration):
Honestly, six upper limbs? And none of the four arms are holding a sword 🤨😖
Anyone else have any "favorites"? Also, I'm wondering if anyone can pose any legit book-accurate renditions.
Last edited:

