ingolmo said:I say that had he gotten hold of The One Ring, he would have turned into a dark lord greater than Morgoth or Sauron.
He is a great smith, he created the Silmarils, he was the leader of the elves and he went to Middle earth to fight agains Morgoth. He is really great but too much fair people die because of his wrath. Fingolfin was slain by Melkor, Turgon also die, so much Edain were killed by the servant of the Enemy. Why? Because Fëanor wanted to recover the Silmaril without any help. The results are the death of many faiir creatures.
True, the trees were sang into existence by Yavanna's power, but I said "if" he had the power. If he had the power of the valar, then, considering his exceptional creative skills, he would do things that, imo, would exceed in beauty and usefulness anything created by the valar - Aule included.And from where did the lights of the Silmarils come from?
Beleg said:
Gotta disagree with you here. One can't even speculate on what action the Valar might have taken had Feanor not broken tryst with them. It is likely that the Valar would have pursued Melkor and recovered the Silmarils, restored the Trees and created a true Eden on Middle-earth for all races.Inderjit S said:...You think so? If it wasn't for the Noldor (and therefore Feanor) Middle-Earth would have been ravaged, and Men would not have been raised to the stature to which they were raised after they met the Eldar, and there would have been no Edain. (It also brang about the union of Elves and Men via Idril and Luthien.)
he whole of 'Middle-earth' was Morgoth's Ring, though temporarily his attention was mainly upon the North-west. Unless swiftly successful, War against him might well end in reducing all Middle-earth to chaos possibly even all Arda.
He must have grasped with great clarity what even we may perceive dimly: that it was the essential mode of the process of 'history' in Arda that evil should constantly arise, and that out of it new good should constantly come. One especial aspect of this is the strange way in which the evils of the Marrer, or his inheritors, are turned into weapons against evil. If we consider the situation after the escape of Morgoth and the reestablishment of his abode in Middle-earth, we shall see that the heroic Noldor were the best possible weapon with which to keep Morgoth at bay, virtually besieged, and at any rate fully occupied, on the northern fringe of Middle-earth, without provoking him
to a frenzy of nihilistic destruction. And in the meanwhile, Men,
or the best elements in Mankind, shaking off his shadow, came
into contact with a people who had actually seen and experienced the Blessed Realm.
In their association with the warring Eldar Men were raised to their fullest achievable stature, and by the two marriages the transference to them, or infusion into Mankind, of the noblest Elf-strain was accomplished, in readiness for the still distant but inevitably approaching, days when the Elves would 'fade'.
Nothing in my post disagrees with what you said above. I merely disagreed with the assertions you made below. No one can be certain what would have transpired whatever the Noldor did. We can only view the tale from the author's perspective as written. Tolkien could have easily taken other avenues.also posted by Inderjit S said:The Valar? Gah! We are here dealing with the narrative as Tolkien wrote it-what may or may not have happened remains exactly that-what may or may not have happened. If there was no Feanor there would be no Beren and Luthein, no Edain, no Numenor, no Rings of Power-there wouldn't be anything much, and the history of Arda would not have been as great-men would have soon into their own petty desires as they wouldn't have been enobled in the fights against Melkor and later Sauron. This, of course, doesn't make Feanor's actions "good". Oh and Cirdan and the wandering Sindar would problably be dead, and so too I guess many other Elves.
Inderjit S said:
Wow, I don't like this thought... Of course if there was no Fëanor there would be no Beren and Lúthien, no Turin Turambar, etc. But that doesn't mean that Fëanor is good. But that's why we love the Works of Tolkien. We know that the history will be changed if someone doesn't exist but we don't like the character. I don't say that I don't want to read about Fëanor in the books but I don't like his deeds. There won't be 'Silmarilion' if Fëanor wasn't born. Melkor would destroy the Two Trees and the Valar cannot create them again. But the Silmarilli exist and they could bring the light back to the Trees. Fëanor didn't allow the Valar to take the Jewels and escaped. So the War of the Jewels began.Indy said:If there was no Feanor there would be no Beren and Luthein, no Edain, no Numenor, no Rings of Power-there wouldn't be anything much, and the history of Arda would not have been as great-men would have soon into their own petty desires as they wouldn't have been enobled in the fights against Melkor and later Sauron.
The Valar vanquish Melkor and drag him back to Valinor. The Silmarils are restored and the Trees brought back to life. Then kinstrife occurs between who will/should lead the Noldor and the Fingolfin and Feanor go to war with one another. Feanor is exiled to Middle-earth for murdering Fingolfin and many of his people follow him into exile. Sauron has taken up abode in Angband and slaughters the sons of Feanor. Feanor is enraged and declares war on Sauron. Many of the Noldor who remain in Valinor are also enraged and cross the ocean to fight on Feanor's side. Same basic story with a twist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?