I was searching over the past few hours for a citation that
Tulkas alone of the
Valar came to
Middle-earth in the
War of Wrath: I believe I read that more than once many years ago, but cannot recall in which book. I did not find it today.
However, I came upon this little gem, which though a non sequitur in the thread, is still tangentially related to the topic at hand. This is what is published as
Letter 349, written about 6 months before
Tolkien died.
I do not understand why you should wish to associate my name with TOLK, an interpreter or spokesman. This is a word of Slavonic origin that became adopted in Lithuanian (TULKAS), Finnish (TULKKI) and in the Scand[inavian] lang[uages], and eventually right across N[orthern] Germany (linguistically Low German) and finally into Dutch (TOLK). It was never adopted in English.
I believe
tulkas means “interpreter” in Lithuanian. (If there are any Lithuanian speakers in the thread, please correct or amend my statement so that it is more precise.) “
Interpreter” is an interesting (and appropriate!) appellation for JRR Tolkien, and it begs the question: Does (or could) Tolkien see Tulkas as an imaginative reflection of himself? might it hint at some subconscious personal desire to combat and overcome
evil? or is this merely interesting coincidence?
Elsewhere, Tolkien admitted his name was German in origin, and here he says TOLK passed into northern Germany, so perhaps Mrs Ehrardt, to whom the letter was addressed, should be forgiven for associating the name with Tolkien; moreover, it seems out of character for JRR Tolkien, who was so interested in names and their etymologies, to deny any connection when the evidence for some connection seems so strong (to a rank amateur such as I at any rate). There is
a post in this forum in which Tolkien told BBC Radio 4 in a 1970 interview,
“Give me a name and I’ll produce a story.” Surely
TOLKIEN is an appropriate name for such a man!