• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Is the age gap between Arwen/Aragorn & 🧝Legolas/Tauriel the same?

Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
2
I keep hearing all these different facts about the LOTR books and I never know which ones are correct. Google doesn't help so I am deciding to ask literally anybody else. Does anybody know if the age gap between Arwen and Aragorn and Legolas and Tauriel is the same? I'm just asking because google keeps auto correcting me and I can't even ask the question.
 
The website Wiki gives biographical information on characters: Aragorn definitely went in for the older woman (i.e. elf) as he was born in Third Age 2931 and the Half-Elven Arwen was born in TA 241 Tauriel is a non canonical character who only appears in the PJ Hobbit trilogy, not Tolkien's writings. I don't think Legolas' birth year was specified by Tolkien.

If you are feeling flush you could invest in Foster's Complete Guide to Middle Earth which has many beautiful illustrations by Ted Nasmith.
 
The following is copied verabtim from the "Ask About Middle Earth" website (FWIW)
( Link to website: Legolas' age )

Legolas’s age is something of a mystery. It’s actually odd, even for Tolkien. In the Appendices at the end of Return of the King is a fairly thorough timeline of the Second and Third Ages, but there is absolutely no mention of Legolas (birth or otherwise) before the Council of Elrond. Based on Legolas’s experience, comments, and personality, though, we can estimate when he was born:

Thranduil, Legolas’s father, is mentioned in the First Age, though Legolas is not. Beyond this, he claims that the Noldor elves were a “strange people” to him, so we can assume that Legolas was born after the War of the Jewels. Again Thranduil is mentioned in the Battle of the Last Alliance and Legolas is not (also, Legolas often shows a lack of familiarity with death, making it very unlikely he’s fought it any great battles before), so we can assume he wasn’t born in the Second Age either. Also, it was once common for the elves of Mirkwood and Lorien to visit each other. Since Legolas has never been to Lorien it can be assumed that he wasn’t born until after this travel became less common (when Sauron once again became a presence in Dol Guldur, around the year 1000 of the Third Age). This means that at most Legolas was likely not much older than 2,000 years old.

During the Two Towers, when Legolas, Aragorn, and Gimli are in Fangorn, Legolas talks about the forest, stating “It is old, very old. So old that almost I feel young again, as I have not felt since I journeyed with you children.” I’d imagine that, for an immortal people, there has to be a pretty significant age difference for one elf to consider another grown person as a child (considering elves come of age at 50). So I’d say Legolas must be at least twice Aragorn’s age, making him at least 200.

So Legolas is most likely somewhere between 200 and 2000 years old during the War of the Ring. Not very helpful, I know. For the movie, the writers did choose a specific age for Legolas (2931, setting his birth year early in the Third Age), though it seems that this date was chosen randomly ((EDIT: Or maybe not? According to the movie people, Legolas is 2,931 years old - and according to the book people, Aragorn was born in the year 2931 of the Third Age, meaning that during the quest his birth year is the same number as Legolas’s age. Coincidence? Or did the movie makers purposefully reuse this number?))
 
Thranduil was crown prince to his father Oropher, in northern Greenwood, during the Second Age. As heirs to crown princes were not such an issue with Elves, and Sauron's forging of the One Ring in 1600 Second Age led to another time of insecurity in which Elves restrained themselves from having children, I would tend to rule out Legolas having been born in the Second Age. Oropher fell in the War of the Last Alliance at the End of the Second Age, so now Thranduil as new king of the north Greenwood Elves may have started thinking of the necessity of an heir. With Sauron temporarily out of the picture, the issue of an heir may not have seemed so pressing to Thranduil for the odd century of the Third Age.
My personal gut feeling (when I thought about it at all) was that Legolas was about Arwen's age, give or take the odd century 😵‍💫 .
Deimos's points above about why Legolas shows unfamiliarity with say Lothlórien are quite plausible.
The rise of Dol Guldur raises conflicting issues: a new period of insecurity speaking against Elves having children, contrasted by the now more pressing need for an heir should the king, leading his forces as usual for Elves in conflict end up falling as did Thranduil's father Oropher.
As to Deimos's hypothesis that Legolas was "at least 200" at this time - while Aragorn was "only" 87 at the time of the CoE, Gimli was 139! That would roughly amount to, in our terms, a 20-year-old calling a 14-year old a child - with predictable responses. For an Elf, being five times as old as a mortal made hardly any difference to being ten of fifteen times as old.

Tauriel - as already mentioned above, pure PJ fanfic.
 
Last edited:
Tauriel is 12-13 years old, .
(Props to anyone who understands this 😆)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top