Yes,
Tolkien did base his cultures upon existing cultural stereotypes.
In
The Letters of JRR Tolkien he makes reference to a "Byzantine" quality of
Gondor. This does not mean that they are allegorical Byzantines (although that is kind of what they are, if you look at the history). And we have the entirety being a Myth for the Anglo-Saxons of England.
Remember that Tolkien is a Catholic, and a Historian, who deals with
Languages.
Given these things, you have a couple of questions that are begged in the underlying assumptions:
Who were the Anglo-Saxons, and what is their relationship to Christianity?
What was Dark
Ages Christianity at that time in relation to the rest of the world?
Gondor (and
Arnor) represents the "Faithful"
peoples of the world (even if they are explicitly a Pagan Culture). They are a "Rome/Byzantine" archetype (and here we bring into this issue some Science that isn't specific to Tolkien, but to all myths).
What was Dark Ages Christianity, specifically Rome and Byzantium threatened by?
That would be:
• Eastern Barbarians (
Easterlings), who were a combination of Germanic Steppe Tribes and Scandinavians, and then Asiatic and Turkish Steppe Tribes, and then East Asian Hordes.
1) The Germanic Steppe Tribes and Scandinavians would be:
– The Avars, Vandals, and Goths
– And then later the Vikings, who were actually called "Easterlings" by the Anglo-Saxons in England when Lödgar Lothbroke invaded England.
2) These would be the Huns, Magyar and Bulgars.
3) These would be the Mongols, Khurasanis, Kwarizmians, and Golden Horde.
Hmmmm??? This seems to be AWFULLY CLOSE to the "Easterlings" described by Tolkien.
1) In the
First Age you have the "Easterlings" who aid
Morgoth, who all have Russo-Viking or JomsViking names (Easter Scandinavians)
– And in
Rhovanion you have the "Goths" (ALL of the
Northmen of Rhovanion have textbook Gothic Names: Marwhimi, Marhari, Vinumavi, Vigugavia, etc..
2) Then you have the Wainriders and Balcoth, who resemble the Huns, Magyars, and Bulgar invasions (with some Mongol and Chinese mixed in).
3) And then you have the Mongol Hordes of the later Third Age and the War of the Rings.
Now, let's look at the
Haradrim:
During the Kin-strife, the descendants of Castamir create what are called the "Corsairs."
In Europe, the "Corsairs" were Libyan Arab Pirates who plied the Mediterranean for roughly 1,000 years. They were Muslims.
Who was another Great Enemy of Rome?
That would be the Muslims, both the Arabs and the Turks.
And Africa, South of Rome was where the Arabs established what is known as the "Islamic Maghreb," where the Libyan Corsairs were established.
Also out of
Far-Harad, we have the "Black Half-Troll-Men," who are pretty explicit stereotypes of Black, sub-Saharan Africans. Geographically, this
places them, both in our world, and in
Middle-earth in
IDENTICAL LOCATIONS: directly south of the Islamic Maghreb/Haradrim.
Now.... What about Khand?
Here it gets a bit murkier. But we still have a clue:
Varyags. The Varyags of Khand.
The word "Varyag" is a Byzantine word that is the root of the word "Varangian," who were the Royal Guards of the Byzantines.
They were originally Norsemen, but during the latter Dark Ages they became instead a mixture of Russo-Urgic Peoples, and Turkish. The word was also applied to Jomsvikings (Eastern Vikings - who were said to be Darker than typical Scandinavians, and mixed with Asian Stock - very fierce and horrific warriors though).
And where did the "Varyags of Khand" originate from?
Tolkien describes them as being remnants of the Wainriders and Balchoth who were relocated out of Rhovanion and into the south-East (the region of Khand).
That is very much similar to how the Rus, in the Ukraine and Crimea in the Dark Ages got there. They were a southerly Branch of Easterling-Vikings.
That Tolkien would, and
DID stereotype is not a crime itself. It is problematic for Modernity, and a pluralistic societies we have today. But Tolkien was a product of his time, Religion, and upbringing.
He was a very conservative, Catholic, Middle-class (meaning Upper-class for the USA) Monarchist who harbored all of the conceits of that class, for good or ill.
He was no outright Racist, but he did have prejudices given to all of those of his time, which today look very much like racism.
And while he may have rejected intentional allegory, that isn't to say that Tolkien did not accidentally create allegory through the use of something called an "Archetype," of which he would have been unaware he was doing, given that the study of Archetypes was contemporary to his creation of Middle-earth (in the worlds of Karl Jung and, especially, Joseph Campbell - whom I studied with for a couple of years formally just before his death in the 1980s).
I will need to go back through the last volume of HoM-e to see if there are any specifics in this beyond the term "varyag."
MB