• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Second-guessing and Misunderstanding Tolkien

My understanding was that he had, indeed, reformed a physical body by the end of the 3rd Age. Without his Ring it took a lot longer (also he'd been killed twice in succession, which is highly disorienting).
 
Yeah, you're going to get that on Quora a lot 😄 Beyond my power to correct, unfortunately; one can only comment and suggest. I think the answers are generally correct, though.

The question of Sauron's corporeality is a common one on Quora, thanks to the Peej's films.
 
Hmm... Very very interesting. If it isn't too much trouble, is there a link to this letter?

Here's a couple references from Tolkien's letters. I can get the numbers if wanted, but for now I'm just pasting this from an old post of mine -- where I was apparently too lazy to note the numbers!

I gave one date however!

"I note your remarks about Sauron. He was always de-bodied when vanquished." JRRT 1957

Tolkien continues (I'm skipping some stuff here) . . .

" . . . It was thus that Sauron appeared in this shape. It is mythologically supposed that when this shape was "real", that is a physical actuality in the physical world and not a vision transferred from mind to mind, it took some time to build up. It was then destructible like other physical organisms. But that of course did not destroy the spirit, nor dismiss it from the world to which it was bound until the end. After the battle with Gilgalad and Elendil, Sauron took a long while to re-build, longer than he had done after the Downfall of Númenor (I suppose because each building-up used up some of the inherent energy of the spirit, that might be called the "will" or the effective link between the indestructible mind and being and the realization of its imagination). The impossibility of re-building after the destruction of the Ring, is sufficiently clear "mythologically" in the present book."

Notable points here, in my opinion:

A) the impossibility of rebuilding not after the loss of the One, but after its destruction

3) Sauron rebuilds his body after the Last Alliance (that it took longer also fits well with the implication of certain statements in the text and The Tale of Years)

And (another letter) . . .

"After which the Third Age began, a Twilight Age, a Medium Aevum, the first of the broken and changed world; the last of the lingering dominion of visible fully incarnate Elves, and the last also in which Evil assumes a single dominant incarnate shape."

Here Sauron would appear to be incarnate in the Third Age as well.

There's more, and add the description of Sauron's hand in The Lord of the Rings.
 

Yup:

Plus Pippin sees Sauron in the Stone of Orthanc; he certainly doesn't see a spirit. And Denethor suggests to Pippin that Sauron is able to fight, or least appear on the battlefield when he tells him, "He uses others as his weapons" as do "all great lords". A spirit is what he becomes after the Ring's destruction in the chapter "Mount Doom", one that "gnaws itself in the shadows" (in Gandalf's words), this time for good. This should be beyond any dispute. The whole point about the Ring is that it lets Sauron reincarnate. But again, thanks to the movies, which outright contradict the book on this, it continues to be a "controversy" and some continue to assume that Sauron is formless during the events of LoR. (This is all meant as a general comment, btw)
 
Last edited:
Oof, there's a word I've never heard before. Now I've got to go study Catholic theology some more.
For the most part I liked the films but I feel like Tolkien would have HATED the idea of a giant flaming eye. We already know (thanks to various letters, not the least of which his response to Pauline Baynes drawings) how he responded to incorrect renderings of his characters. I may not have always liked how Christopher Tolkien responded to things but it seems to largely be akin to how his father did.
 
Thank you also, Enting. I might see if a quick eBook or loan from my library could familiarize me with the material.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…