
You mean you hope it is an AI question!AI question... correction...troll AI question
Yep.....If it's a real person asking it, well, as they say: "And these people are allowed to vote??!!"You mean you hope it is an AI question!
Actually, in the LotR craze started by the publication of the Ballantine paperback in the US in the late '60's, there are reports of graffiti to the effect "Gandalf for President". White Council, White House ... just semantics. 🤓
Actually, in the LotR craze started by the publication of the Ballantine paperback in the US in the late '60's, there are reports of graffiti to the effect "Gandalf for President". White Council, White House ... just semantics. 🤓
Delete movies and what's associated with it, and LotR was all that before your parents were born. And the name is spelled Tolkien, you illiterate.
1) Does the concept of "maps" ring a weak bell? (There's this magazine called "National Geographic" ...)Why didn't the dwarves take part in the defense of Gondor or the Battle of the Pelennor Fields?
Are you kidding me? This question again? 😖
That is actually a false statement that many fall for. Goblins were already traditionally weaker creatures IRL tales, a fact that Tolkien only later accounted for by saying that the “goblins” creatures he initially wrote about and planted in children’s heads should better have been called the scarier IRL trope of “orcs.” as the tales of those were fiercer. Remember that Hobbit was a bedtime story. LOTR was a larger mature tale. Tolkien here specifically acknowledges the error of the name and thus why the change was made. Goblins are not Orcs. Goblins BECAME orcs through the storytelling by omission and replacement.
Which means the LOTR PETER JACKSON Goblin King and his crew should have been something vastly different. (Where did the un-elves come from down there?)
And which meat was back on the menu again?
To my statement that the words are interchangeable, I got this gem of a reply:
Your untrue statement …”It says plainly in The Hobbit that ‘goblin’ is the translation for ‘orc’.”..tells me you will resort to lying. A simple text search of the book including citations and publication info reveals the letter pattern roughly 60 times and all of those times is it only part of Orcrist or Torch as well. In none of them is the word “orc” itself ever used or translated. Tolkien never translated orc to mean goblin.
I know you think Orcrist meaning Goblin Slayer feels obvious except the Sindarin for goblin is Orch and Orc is a 16th century Latin word. That is a clear case of linguistic reversal where gibberish is ungainly conlanged into meaning. Even the Rist part reads weird as Ris is “cleave” but the dwarvish language adds hard-consonants at the end words , not elven which prefers vowel and soft-syllable ends.
This imbalance means that Orcrist is an unreliable indicator of language by itself. Since it is the only “orc”-indicator, this word is not evidence of connection by itself without corroborating evidence. Since you have resorted to lying, all your subsequent statements are suspect.
They were not the same. Tolkien did the tear away page two-step retcon to make that happen. The Hobbit's goblins are not the melded creatures of the Trilogy and lies don’t become you. I believe in you to be better.