The problem for PJ and co is that some Tolkien purist actually own the rights (e.g. Tolkien estate) and they have made it very clear there won't be a Silmarillion movie. Maybe with the right offer they can change their mind. But i am not talking about money, the only way that I think they would agree is if they have a said in the script. Peter Jackson is a great movie director, but his story twists didn't please Tolkien's heirs, and they are the boss here.Going to have to live with it. Book purists aren't the target audience and PJ is the proverbial face ofTolkien.
I think once we accept this we can feel some sense of peace.
CL
Imho, he is fantastic for action, battle scenes.Peter Jackson is a great movie director, but his story twists didn't please Tolkien's heirs, and they are the boss here.
I agree. And he put too much emphasis in love stories which Tolkien really didn't seem to care too much.Imho, he is fantastic for action, battle scenes.
For emotional, drama sequences, he is very bad.
He is overusing tears, arguing.. makes the whole sequence looks very cheesy/cheap.
(examples: Elrond Council, scenes between Aragorn and Arwen, scenes with Frodo and Sam, scenes after Gandalf fall with Balrog.. etc).
"Where was Gondor..."?
--------------
But all is forgiven after Rop, lol.
As for Silmarillion movies (actually series, because movies would be impossible) , I think that someone will eventually do it.
And it will do it good... maybe after series of failed attempts... maybe after 200 years from now... but we will have it.
That looks like Beaker holding the torch. I always knew he was a ticking time bomb.I have decided I would only accept a Silmarillion movie if it were a Muppet adaptation in which Maedhros is the only human (Elf) actor who plays the role completely straight.
View attachment 43492
Going to have to live with it. Book purists aren't the target audience and PJ is the proverbial face ofTolkien.
I think once we accept this we can feel some sense of peace.
CL
sort of agree, the issue is with the Silmarillion it would be a lot tougher to please the fans because I believe most people who read and re-read the Silmarillion are hardcore fans, as opposed to LOTR or the Hobbit.I agree with you. The money is always the one major factor when it comes down to high budget theatrical productions, and if there is a projection that the Silmarillion would bring in it would certainly be in the works. The matter is, finding the person to commit to bringing the writings to life. And that is why I think the demand would simply be to great as the Silmarillion seems like a very difficult book to adapt to film without royally pissing off the fans, hence my understanding and agreement with the consensus that book fans would not support him or ANY director that doesn't completely include all the details that always get left out of movie adaptations. (Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, etc.)
Absolutely NO, if PJ makes it I am not watching it, after the aberration they called the Hobbit trilogy I am done with Peter Jackson. Bring Spielberg or James Cameron.However, to any one potentially invested in an adaptation that opposes the fact that Peter Jackson would make the most sense as a director for a hypothetical Silmarillion film just doesn't resonate with me.
To say that anyone other director could be chosen just wouldn't sit right in my opinion given he does hold some weight of the series that fans like myself have come to love. The Amazon production of Middle Earth makes sense not have PJ because its a spin off that he might not have even been asked to be part of, or could have the ability to accept due to previous commitments. (someone fact check me if you know otherwise, it would be interesting to read up on). Quite frankly I might not even be interested in watching the Amazon series either, but that remains to be seen.
PJ is a great image creator, but a terrible story teller. I don't think he even understood the LOTR, and the Silmarillion is 1000 times more complex.The Silmarillion would be a gem of its own that would require the same attention that of which Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit received and then some if it were to be made.
absolutely, James Cameron and Spielberg out of the top of my head are 100 times better than Jackson. Even Christopher Lee criticized him. There are other directors that can do well like Nolan, or Guillermo del Toro (that I think originally was going to direct the Hobbit).Now, the weird thing is, I am writing here to support Peter Jackson due to the fact that he was ultimately the person who was chosen as director of the past films. Who is to say that if it were another director who took on the role wouldn't have done an equal or better job? We will never know, unless there is some sort of alternate universe where say Guillermo Del Toro directed it, but I hope you understand why I stand by Peter Jackson being the best person for the job.
I think I'd cast Beaker as Turin in our Muppet Silmarillion. He looks appropriately neurotic and prone to misfortune!That looks like Beaker holding the torch. I always knew he was a ticking time bomb.
Not the only time Beaker carried a torch...
No no, Tauriel has been hired by Morgoth and Sauron's modeling agency to impersonate Maedhros.
This would be absolutely hilarious, and I would definitely watch it. 🤣I have decided I would only accept a Silmarillion movie if it were a Muppet adaptation in which Maedhros is the only human (Elf) actor who plays the role completely straight.
View attachment 43492
Hehehe, all that angst and misfortune, and all we hear out of him is “meep meep meep meep!”I think I'd cast Beaker as Turin in our Muppet Silmarillion. He looks appropriately neurotic and prone to misfortune!
No they won't because the Tolkien Estate would sue them.A Silmarillion based movie is being made in the anime-style ala War of the Rohirrim, and will be a collaboration of the writing teams of both War of the Rohirrim and Rings of Power; with Andy Serkis and Liv Tyler consulting. Look it up!
That is unfortunate - didn't know they have been doing that, although it does make sense. For how long have they been shutting down these channels? A few years?they have been shutting down youtube channels that used AI to make Silmarillion movies
Have faith my friend.Let's be clear, if you visit the Tolkien estate website, it says in the FAQ that there are no plans for a Silmarillion movie. They don't say it will never be but after the experience with how PJ bastardize LOTR and especially The Hobbit, I think if they ever budge they will keep a very short leash and PJ certainly won't do it.
I don't know for how long they have been doing it, but when a new AI channel pops up it's only a few weeks until it's shut down.That is unfortunate - didn't know they have been doing that, although it does make sense. For how long have they been shutting down these channels? A few years?
Given how wide and in-depth The Silmarillion really is, I doubt a movie that's both true enough to the source material and appealing enough to the audiences would eventually come into existence. Plus, the book is already a masterpiece in itself, and one of my favourite literary works.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?