• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

United Artists is only thing blocking The Hobbit movie



I just don't think Chris Tolkien should be deciding what works JRR Tolkien wrote should be allowed to be adapted to film. If he want's to protect the books from being re-written or altered on paper, then fine. But the movies are a different format. They don't have the phrase "Tolkien Approved" or "Official Tolkien Merchandise" stamped on them anywhere. They are based on his books.

The fans of the books should be the people deciding whether the movies are warranted. - And with over 2 Billion in movie ticket sales worldwide, not including the DVD sales, I'd say the fans made their opinion loud and clear. A handful of Purists, and Chris Tolkien should not be deciding what the millions of LOTR an Hobbit fans get to see.
 
The Hobbit will certainly generate millions of dollars and PJ would not have the issues he had in LOTR to deal with, since the Hobbit is less dynamic and focuses on one continuous plot line. I look forward to it.

Well, that's what I've been telling 'The Fam' since I've been hearing about this possible movie last month.......

It's only 287 pages, not 1300+, so it's much less in need of being changed.

The only things I could see being changed might be Beorn - I don't know why but that whole chapter just seems too 'fairy-tale-ish compared to the rest of the story to me - plus probably Bilbo singing the songs to the spiders to infuriate them for the same reason. Does "Lazy lob, crazy cob" come off on screen as something to throw a huge shelob-like spider into a rage?

BUT, is PJ willing to follow the story & kill off THE dragon a half hour before the movie ends with a single arrow & then have the Battle Of The Five Armies take place?

Knowing PJ, I could see the climax being 'The Battle Of The Five Armies And One Dragon'.........


But I agree - and I'm STILL TOTALLY confused as to who owns the rights - if it's just UA vs New Line or really anything except except CT saying "I don't want my father's work disparaged", it will get done because there's too much $$$$$ to be made & that's why these folks are in the movie biz......
 
Turin said:
Well as long as their keeping the rights away from PJ they're doing something good.

Speaking of brick walls, eh Nether?

Anyway, I don't want to see the Hobbit done. To me it just doesn't seem like it would work in a movie.
 
There's a lot more suggested in The Hobbit that could be written into a film. For instance, a plot line could follow Gandalf to the final White Council at Rivendell, then to the cleansing of Dol Guldur (some Galadriel/Lothlorien here) which, like in LotR, Gandalf hoped would distract the Necromancer from the little hobbit passing by. And another could follow the build of up the Orcs and Wargs in preparation for the Battle of the Five Armies. Also, there is that wonderful piece in Unfinished Tales where Gandalf meets Thorin and suggests he takes a Hobbit with him. It would make a great film, if it was done properly.
 

True - and if PJ had alot of room in the movie, he could try to develop some of Tolkien's less developed stories. Then again, all it would do is tick off purists again (see Arwen & Aragorn in LOTR).

As for a previous poster, I don't think the kiling of Smaug followed by the big battle would be anti-climatic, as long as PJ keeps that conflict as a possibility throughout the latter half of the movie. If he just springs it on us out of nowhere, then it would be bad. But if he get's the dwarves talking about it during the quest to reclaim the hall and Gandalf and Bilbo have a few asides warning about the possibility of a conflict for control of the moutain after Smaug's demise, then it would be great!

And we could get one last major WETA battle!
 

I will make a prediction: Someone — PJ or someone else — will make a film of The Hobbit, and The Battle of the Boards here will go on with fresh fuel!

(I came here after the films were in theaters. What was it like here BEFORE there was ever word of Peter Jackson?)

Lotho
 

I don't know. I came across this forum just before The Two Towers were released, but never really posted anything. Then when purists started whining about Faramir, I felt like chiming in to defend PJ. Been here defending PJ and the movies ever since!

I'm sure all the Purists hate me by now, or just see me as some fickle movie-lover with no respect for the books, but they have no clue about me.

Nor do I care!
 

I'm sure that when news of this project was released, the npw's were foolishly hoping the movie would follow the book verbatim. And like everthing else connected with the books this site was probably stagnating until that time. More than 2/3 of the people posting on the movie thread are fads, so it's likely that they didn't spend their life here.
 

Yup - and I'll bet a few months after the ROTK Extended Editon is released, and if there is no sign of the Hobbit making it to the screen, this site will slowly fade back to getting maybe a few dozen GOOGLE hits a day and the occasional Purist chit-chat.

There simply won't be anthing to talk about, complain about or defend after that.
 
As (I presume) most of the purists have read the background stuff, there would be no problem with adding what I've suggested above because Tolkien said it happened. The only grist to the purist mill then would be if the invented scenes Tolkien hinted at were out of character or not in keeping with Tolkien's writings (eg: like Gollum framing Sam).

WETA battles: Prelude: Thorin Oakenshield with Thrain v Azog would do for starters. Also smaller conflicts with Gandalf/Thorin v Great Goblin Chieftain, Wargs and Goblins v Gandalf in tree; Beorn v Goblins and Wargs; quite enough to keep a cinema audience going.
 
Ooh yes! And they could re-use the Balrog, as Dain Ironfoot kills Azog on the steps of Moria and decides not to go any further!

Anyways... I feel certain that since CT is not in the way, between New Line and UA they will eventually come to the conclusion that there is enough profit for both of them in this, and will strike a deal. Bring it on!
 

I'm drooling already!

Lotho
 
There's a lot more suggested in The Hobbit that could be written into a film. For instance, a plot line could follow Gandalf to the final White Council at Rivendell, then to the cleansing of Dol Guldur (some Galadriel/Lothlorien here) which, like in LotR, Gandalf hoped would distract the Necromancer from the little hobbit passing by.

WHY WHY WHY????????

There's NO need to go there.

That's not a part of the plot......

Gandalf goes off, you mention why he goes away, that's it.....

Just like the book.

Why add stuff & complicate the storyline?
 
CT stikes me as the epitome of the npw. I imagine him pulling his gandalf hat down over his eyes whenever the mention of these movies infulence in bringing more people to the book reaches him.
 
The storyline's already there, courtesy of JRRT. It just needs filling in for Dol Guldur and the Orc build up (Thorin's tale is already magnificently told). The alternative - picture it Bucky - a bunch of shorties almost buried in beard running along, having a little adventure, running along again, having another adventure.... The reason it works in the book is because of the excellent dialogue and the magnificence of Tolkien's storytelling. I'm sure the film would be a big hit without the above, because it's The Hobbit. But Tolkien did already write much of what's suggested, and told of Saruman's behaviour at the White Council and the cleansing of Dol Guldur, and that the Eagles had watched the buildup of the Orcs. It's all Tolkien. I'd love to see it put in, so long as it wasn't at the expense of something silly like leaving Beorn or the Arkenstone out of the story.
 
The reason it works in the book is because of the excellent dialogue and the magnificence of Tolkien's storytelling. I'm sure the film would be a big hit without the above, because it's The Hobbit. But Tolkien did already write much of what's suggested,

Not really.
It's mentioned, but in no great detail & certainly not in the Hobbit nor central to the Hobbit's storyline.
That opens up PJ to writing a whole bunch of stuff himself.

All the audience needs to know is that Gandalf went away & why & that he comes back.....
Anything else really distracts from the central story.

It would be like showing the war in the Pacific in 'Patton' because FDR says he's going to send Patton there to command an army after the war in Europe ends.......

All you need to know is the facts, not the whole story behind them.....

The story in The Hobbit itself could easily make a 3 hour movie IMHO; They might even have to cut out a few things as it is......
 
Bucky said:
Anything else really distracts from the central story
The Lord of the Rings is the central story, following on from the rich history of Middle Earth. The Necromancer is Sauron and, as Tolkien said, the Hobbit 'fitted'. I love writing screenplays - it's so much quicker than writing books! Here's a scene I have shared before, that I would like to see included in some form:-
 
The Lord of the Rings is the central story,

Not when you are making a movie called The Hobbit

You are making a movie that is a story that begins & ends in the theatre that night & doesn't need to be 'artificially' tied into a Trilogy that was released 5 years earlier.

It's being made for the general public, not for a few Tolkien fanatics........
The majority of whom would HATE everything PJ altered & made up anyway.
 

Not when you are making a movie called The Hobbit Tolkien said in his letter to Milton Waldman:
I did not know as I began it that it belonged. But it proved to be the discovery of the completion of the whole, its mode of descent to earth, and merging into 'history'.
and in letters to CA Furth of Allen and Unwin The two stories, together with the entire mythology, are inextricably entwined.
 
Of course the stories are entwined.......

Why don't we just make the audience study the family trees of the Tooks, Brandybucks, Baggins, Boffins, Bracegirdles & Proudfoots when they enter they theatre while we're at it?

Instead of 'movie trivia' on the screen, we can show 'Hobbit Family Trees' & 'Appendix A Rulers Of Gondor, Arnor, Arthedian & Cheiftains of the Dunedain of the North', plus 'Kings of Rohan', 'House Of Durin'......



Don't you get it?
What JRR Tolkien thought, in all due respect - and I've read the books 25 times - does not matter to Joe Average Moviegoer who wants to be entertained for 2.5-3 hours & couldn't care less that Glamdring

A. Belonged to the King Of Gondolin, let alone that
B. Turgon was that King of Gondolin and
C. Gondolin was the hidden city in the first Age that was the last Kingdom to fall to Morgoth, who was
D. The first Dark Lord, "of whom Sauron of Mordor was merely a servant", who's true name was Melkor, who was
E. One of the Valar, who were the......

See what I mean?


Ideas you are suggesting
are simply congesting
Public's attention span MUST be heeded
Their concentration losing
in all the confusing
subplots not needed
When planning a project
You must remember this:
K.I.S.S.

(Keep It Simple, Stupid)

BTW, 'Stupid' isn't YOU, it's a saying used in the anacronisym 'kiss' to make a point when people try to over complicate plans, so please don't take it as a personal attack, I'm just trying to write some poetry as bad as Tolkien's.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…