• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Uruks vs. Uruk-hai

Ugh. Just re-read your post about Mr. Hammond's intentions. A chronology (rather than a publishing of notes and other materials) is decidedly less useful in regards to the debate.

I'll agree with you on the last bit- opinions seem to be what we are left with. However, it is worth noting (one last time, hopefully) that even with Tolkien's revisions to Ms. Smith's index, Uruk-hai was never equated with Uruks in the LotR index. Not that this is definitive proof by any stretch of the imaginition, but it is suggestive, and as such, better than nothing.
 
We have already been through the 'cross-referencing' (and/or lack there-of) in the index. The suggestion is purely subjective.
 
Suggestive, subjective.

Potayto, potato.

Let's call the whole thing agreed upon.
 
No, basically, you continue to insist on manufacturing facts on this one particular topic -- something highly uncharacteristic of your analyses of the texts, which are usually very, very well done.

Nowhere does Christopher Tolkien say or imply that his father prepared an index for Unfinished Tales, and the index published in that book was composed by Christopher specifically for that book.

You're not simply inferring a connection which has never been substantiated or supported by any text, you're assuming it's inherently self-evident, which it is not.

This isn't a matter of opinion. This is a matter of taking things in the proper context. The index entry in Unfinished Tales only refers to "The Battles of the Fords of Isen". It doesn't refer directly or obliquely to The Lord of the Rings and therefore has absolutely nothing to do with that book.
 
No, you are manufacturing something I did not say. My facts are quite accurate. You are deliberately trying to distort what I said and create a strawman.
CT specifically stated that he used his fathers rough draft index for LotR for translations and wording of some definitions found in the UT index. He specifically stated that the defining statements are not restricted to matters mentioned in the book.

If you wish to continue you will desist from telling me what I am doing.
 
Tar-Elenion said:
No, you are manufacturing something I did not say. My facts are quite accurate. You are deliberately trying to distort what I said and create a strawman.
Nonsense. It is you who insist on distorting Christopher Tolkien's index for Unfinished Tales into something written by Tolkien as a comment on the use of "uruks" and "uruk-hai".

Christopher's specific statement in no way implies that an entry clearly referring solely to "The Battles of the Fords of Isen" was in any way prepared for The Lord of the Rings.

Feel free to cite a definitive connection between the UT index entry and The Lord of the Rings. I've been waiting a long time for you or ANYONE to do so.

So far, nothing has been forthcoming.

I suggest we let this matter rest for now. Nothing new is being said (again).
 
I gave you fair warning to desist. You Michael, are trying to create a strawman. I am not going to play along with it. It bores me immensely. You pretend to claim a distortion when, in fact, it is you doing the distorting. What I stated was accurate. The quotes have been supplied in this thread.

Now lets see if you can follow your own suggestion.
 
Thread reopened.

The offending posts have been deleted.

DO NOT, under any circumstances, start up a personal affair again. If you have something to say on the topic of the thread, by all means say it. Be polite, be open-minded and take personal matters to PM/email.

Thank you.
 
We cannot tell for SURE who Tolkien meant to be the ancestors of the Uruk-hai--the origins of all Orcs are shrouded in mystery according to the book, and Saruman is not about to tell Gandalf or another one of the good guys what he did (and most of the book is written in limited-omniscient perspective)--but putting in my two cents, I would side with the "Uruk-hai as part-humans" theory. I would like to make several further points, and I hope I am not repeating anything already discussed:

I. References to other hybrid creatures, i.e. Halfelven and men with elvish blood. Elrond and Aragorn, to name one of each, are referred to as an "Elf" and a "Man" respectively in most instances throughout the book. Even though they contain characteristics of both races, their hybrid nature is mentioned only occasionally when referring to their races. Thus, even if the Uruk-hai and Ruffians really are orc/human hybrids (the former with more orc characteristics, the latter with more human characteristics) it is consistent with the rest of the text to refer to them merely as "Orcs" (even "Uruks") and "Men." If the precedent of the elf/humans is to be taken, it should be possible for hybrid orc/humans to "choose" one race while still retaining characteristics of the other. Perhaps it is to be expected that some become "Orcs" and others "Men." I suspect Gamling's comment about the "half-orcs and goblin-men" in Helm's Deep may be phrased that way to emphasize the atrocity of interbreeding orcs and humans, which is different from the mere fact that Saruman has orcs in his keeping. "Half-orcs" and "goblin-men" might not be separated in that line were they the same type of creature.

For the moment at least, I will leave it open that "Uruk-hai" is a plural of "Uruk," and other "Uruk-hai" which are full-blooded or even part-human orcs may possibly belong to Sauron, even though I do not believe the context of the books support these assertions. I am merely claiming that "Uruks"/"Uruk-hai" need not mean full-blooded orcs.

II. Behavior of Saruman's Uruk-hai. Although Orcs as characters are poorly developed, the battle cry of the Uruk-hai, "We are the fighting Uruk-hai!" appears to show more camaraderie, in the human sense, than anything uttered by Misty Mountains or Mordor orcs. In fact, it sounds almost collegiate. A Google search for "We are the fighting," in addition to this page, yields "We are the fighting Irish" (Notre Dame), "We are the fighting Illini" (U-Illinois), "We are the fighting Gamecocks" (U-South Carolina), etc. "We do not stop the fight for night or day, for fair weather or for storm" (Uruk-hai at Helm's Deep) perhaps resembles "Our hearts shall give while we do live" (Princeton University fight song) and has somewhat of the same meaning. Grishnakh and the Misty Mountains Orcs fail to respond in kind, even when presented with the opportunity to do so. In the scene where Merry and Pippin are captured, all the orc parties verbally attack one another, but it is only the Uruk-hai of Saruman that extol the virtues of their master, such as the fact that he gives them "man's-flesh" to eat. ("This is the bread which the Lord hath given you to eat" Exodus 16:15, referring to the manna that rained down from heaven for the Israelites.) Grishnakh, for example, shows great ambivalence about the Nazgul awaiting on the river bank, even in front of his enemies. I wonder wherein the difference lies?

--I am Rakh. I hold an undergraduate degree, with honors, in ecology and evolutionary biology from the Ivy League. I have spoken.
 
He is generally referred to as 'halfelven' however, the lineage of Elrond is clear in that his elven heritage is unquestionable;


Certainly not Elf alone, but greatest of any called halfelven'. Actually, there is a question for you, Is Elrond the most renowned Half-Elven?
 
Tricksy, Tricksy, Tricksy. Of course he was not. The most renowned Half-Elven would have been Luthien.

Hope I didn't spoil your party.

ROFL! I also agree that the Orc of Saruman were stouter and definately operated as units. Ironically, it was a Mordor Orc, Grishnak (sp) who had the cunning and strength to flee with Merry and Pippin. While the fighting Uruk-hai were being slaughtered by the men of the Riddermark, Grishnak very nearly escaped with the treasure.

I would like to discuss the Uruk-hai versus Uruk issue again and will begin reviewing all my material again over the next month to make an intelligent presentation of my opinion.

--I am grond. I hold an undergraduate degree, without honors, in accounting, business and marketing from a highly reputable Central Louisiana University. I have also read the works of Tolkien about 22,000,000 times. I have spoked.

Cheers,

grond
 
The clock is ticking, o Grond-iose one, and a month has come and gone. Not that I'm going to lecture anyone on sticking to deadlines for turning in work on U v. U-h- I'm still compiling my view of the argument for the folks at Encyclopedia of Arda. Hey, are those guys still around?
Yes, yes they are. Back to work then. Let's see what you come up with, G-man.
 
Maybe PE17 will have something relevant to this thread. Part of the announcement reads:

"Parma Eldalamberon," 'The Book of Elven-tongues', is a journal of the Elvish
Linguistic Fellowship, a special interest group of the Mythopoeic Society.
The current issue is a commentary by J. R. R. Tolkien from the late 1950s and early 1960s concerning the words and names from his invented languages incorporated into The Lord of the Rings. This commentary has been edited and annotated by Christopher Gilson, with the permission and guidance of Christopher Tolkien and the Tolkien Estate.​

"Words, Phrases and Passages" is a collection of notes on the Quenya, Sindarin, Dwarvish, Rohirric and Black Speech examples occurring in "The Lord of the Rings," with detailed translations and syntactic explanations, together with a discussion of the etymologies of the various words and names. For the Elvish examples these are traced back to their Common Eldarin roots. The entries were arranged by Tolkien in the order in which the words and phrases occurred in the story and this arrangement has been preserved in this edition.​

Although Tolkien never completed the commentary as originally planned, he
retained the more cursory list of words and names from which he was working; and he continued to compose further notes on the grammar and history of the Elvish words and names in the story. Many of these were placed together with "Words, Phrases and Passages," and the main commentary has been supplemented by these notes in this edition. Together these texts give the clearest picture we have of how Tolkien conceived of his linguistic inventions in the forms they were revealed to his readers.​

My copy has been ordered but has not arrived yet. But again, maybe
 
Actually it arrived today! Here's something...

'The debased form of the B. S. which survived in the Third Age only in the Dark Tower is seen in a few names (as Uruk-hai 'Orc-folk') and the fragment of vituperation uttered by one of Grishnakh's companions, emissaries from Sauron.'​

From Words, Phrases and Passages Parma Eldalamberon 17
 
Perhaps settling what the words themselves mean, at least. For those of us who are not possessed of PE, and who are yet still attempting to unravel what was said by JRRT, what was said by CT, and what was said by various editors and annotators, could you (Galin) if possible expound on your excerpt, and tell us if this comes from Mr. Gilson, Mr. Tolkien JR, or Mr. Tolkien Sr?

I'm still a bit confused personally by Tolkien continually referring to Grishnakh's companion as a servant of the Dark Tower. The utterance in the 'black speech' (referred in appendix F and elsewhere here in this thread) is indisputably made by Pippin's yellow-fanged guard, who is almost immediately killed by Uglúk's mates, and who is later (chronologically, actually earlier in the text) described by Aragorn as one of the "Northern Orcs from far away".
 
Sure, the context in general is the Black Speech on the Ring. After a note B krimp-, tie, bind, there is the following in PE17:

'The Black Speech was not intentionally modeled on any style, but was meant to be self-consistent, very different from Elvish, yet organized and expressive, as would be expected of a device of Sauron before his complete corruption. It was evidently an agglutinative language, and the verbal system must have included pronominal suffixes expressing the object, as well as those indicating the subject: -ul is a pl. objective, translated 'them', and -ûk an element meaning 'the whole, all' (thrakatalûk I 267 is a misprint for -ulûk, as correctly written in the flame letters). The stem burz 'dark' is also found in the later Lugbûrz = Barad-dûr; in the archaic ring-inscription burzumishi is evidently made up of this stem + a particularizing suffix or 'article' um, and an enclitic 'preposition' ishi 'in, inside'. The debased form of the B. S. which survived in the Third Age only in the Dark Tower is seen in a few names (as Uruk-hai 'Orc-folk') and the fragment of vituperation uttered by one of Grishnakh's companions, emissaries from Sauron. I have tried to play fair linguistically, and it is meant to have a meaning and not to be a mere casual group of nasty noises, though an accurate translation would even nowadays only be printable in the higher and artistically more advanced forms of literature. According to my taste such things are best left to Orcs, ancient and modern.' ​

The editorial note which follows explains: 'This is from the carbon copy of a letter to Mr. W. R. Matthews (dated 13-15 June 1964), which Tolkien placed in the same file with the manuscript of 'Words, Phrases and Passages' (...).'

The editorial note is longer, explaining agglutinative language and other things.
 
Thanks, Galin!

Well, I'd say "Uruk-hai" as "Orc-men" is out for sure now, regardless of how nice of a theory it might have been. Still not sure if the term Uruk-hai only strictly applies to Saruman's troops, or to all "great soldier-orcs that at this time issued from Mordor and Isengard".

Certainly I think I can show that Tolkien considered Saruman's troops to be uniquely different from Sauron's from conception, and described them quite differently in the text. Additionally, I can show that the distinction between the two types of Orcs goes back to Tolkien's conception of the passages refferring to soldier orcs of Isengard and Mordor. The only remaining question is, did Tolkien intend that the two different terms (U and U-h) distinguished between the two different races of soldier orcs, or that both types were equally U and U-h (as suggested in appendix F), and that qualifiers such as "U-h of Isengard" were the manner of distinguishing Saruman's rare breed.
Certainly Uruks is anglicized something, and barring discovery of another BS plural term with 'uruk' in it, we're probably at the end of the argument (famous last words).
 
Last edited:
It is an awesome thread - and I am a late-comer. I have once posted the following on another forum:

About “uruks” and “uruk-hai”: the words mean almost the same. The latter word means uruk-people - uruks as race.
I recommend this article on the Black Speech and its similarities with Hittite language http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/orkish.htm

But the fact that they were called by the same word doesn’t mean that Mordor and Isengard uruks were the same race.

The Black Uruks of Mordor I believe had NO mannish blood added in the Third Age (I leave out the question of the origin of orcs back in Utumno). I think they were simply the result of artificial selection among orcs. Sauron (or the Witck.King, or both) took the biggest , fittest and most resistant to light (therefore with the darkest skin) and bred them over and over again for several generations.
Here is a quote from HOME 12, the draft for Appendix A: It doesn’t seem there was any interbreeding with men involved, or it would have been mentioned.

As for the Isengarders, I think that the words of Treebeard (1) and especially the quote from Morgoth’s Ring (2) leave no doubt that an interbreeding program of Man and orcs DID indeed take place in Isengard.



There is a very important question: When did the interbreeding program start? - At the earliest, it might have started after 2759 when Saruman took possession of Isengard. He desired to emulate Sauron for a long time – studying the Ring-lore, and breeding-lore (quote 2) as well. Quote 2 tells us that he rediscovered Morgoth’s secret himself.
Alternatively, the breeding could have started much later, when Saruman became ensnared by Sauron via his palantir (TA 3000 according to the Tale of Years).
This quote from UT that was brought to my attention in one of the replies dates the breeding program TA 2990.

If Saruman’s interbreeding program was THAT recent –30 years before the War of the Ring - there is indeed no way for all ten thousand of Sariman’s uruks to be cross-breeds. Just not enough time.

Some great uruks were already in Saruman’s service prior to 3000.
He had got some Mordorian Black uruks from Moria, it seems. Moria was populated by "Sauron’s creatures" since 2500, probably the same black uruk race that was spotted in Minas Morgul in 2475. Others may have been deserters from Mordor, because, as we know from Gorbag and Shagrat, going away to roam in free bands was the sweetest dream of Sauron’s uruks. Perhaps some have found their way to Saruman’s service even prior to Sauron’s return to Mordor.
As Saruman’s uruk-hai were black skinned, there is no doubt that the genetic material used for their "production" were Mordorian black uruks, not white-skinned "maggots" from Moria.

As to the method: Did Saruman go to such lengths as Morgoth did? (Quote2:"undoubted Men could under the dominion of Morgoth or his agents in a few generations be reduced almost to the Orc-level of mind and habits; and then they would or could be made to mate with Orcs” ) - I bet, not. He didn’t have time to train Men for even "a few generations" and he had not Morgoth’s power to pervert creatures. I am sure he took the easiest way, capturing women from Rohan and maybe Dunland and giving them to his uruks.
The program, undoubtedly, started as small-scale experiment. Of course, not everyone of Saruman’s 10000 uruks had a human mother. The disappearance of several thousand women from the area could not have remained unnoticed. No, I think less than a hundred women taken in raids over the years were used.

It is quite disgusting to talk about, so I will concentrate only on genetics Let us look at what happened when Saruman crossed a black uruk with a white-skinned blue eyed captive woman. Both white skin and blue eyes may be considered (with some simplification) recessive genes. The first generation would be much like their fathers, with the skin color maybe only a shade lighter. Recessive genes would not be expressed. The first generation would be practically undistinguishable from black uruks. But, if we hypothesize that "resistance to light" is a dominant gene, then this first generation, unlike their fathers, would be resistant to light.
Also these half-breeds would call themselves "uruk-hai", like their fathers did. (I doubt that raised under Saruman’s tutelage they would be proud of their human ancestry or if they even knew about it – likely they were told that their superior abilities were a result of “good training”).

Then, as in the first generation of cross-breeds there were undoubtedly both males and females, Saruman simply made them mate with each other. And here, in total accordance with Mendel’s laws, the recessive genes, inherited from grandmothers, started to appear in about a third of the group. In the third and later generations more recessive genes were expressed, so the mixed-blood population (still in fact 50% orc 50% human) became more and more heterogeneous, human and orc features appearing in different combinations. And here some would be called "Men-orcs" and used for spying, some would be called "Orc-Men", and the majority of the group, with the dominant genes expressed, would make some of Saruman’s best fighting uruk-hai we meet in the LOTR. Some others would be cross-breeds between half-orcs and orcs. Perhaps even 25% of human blood would assure the resistance to light.

As a side note, in a part of the second and further generations the recessive "fear of light" gene will reappear. I think those unfortunate uruk-babies were simply eliminated.

What I am trying to point out is that one will never get a homogenous population as a result of interbreeding very different genetic material. There would be inevitably those who looked like Black uruks but also those that could be called Men-Orcs and Orc-Men, especially in the second etc. generations. And a white-skinned Orc-Man could be a brother of one of the "uruk-hai".
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…