After that, I'll add in the illustration placeholders.
Sounds like you continue to progress well.
As to my own writing project and its progress, I'm still revising and expanding Chapter 1 as necessary to 'set the table' for the rest of the book.
Meanwhile, Chapter 2 is being written in my heartwood, as I move toward it.
We will take up
Tolkien's Creation, the "elements of religion and morality" it unveils and sets afoot, and how it is similar to yet very different from the 'Catholic/Christian' background most say he 'was unable to avoid' infusing into his works. (Not that he WANTED to avoid it - nay rather, he intentionally infused it. But I don't see many (make that any) writing about how he also intentionally
departed from that same background and worldview.)
After we deal with his Creation and how it sets the stage for all the rest, we'll move to dealing specifically with the elements of religion and the elements of morality separately, letting the text inductively show how Tolkien both contained (absorbed) and reflected (mirrored back),
in solution,
* his elements for the reader's discernment and extraction. He said the elements
must be in any work of fantasy/mythology. Our business then, is to ferret them out and see what he included, and how he did so.
* - these three points, 'contain,' 'reflect,' and 'in solution' being points taken directly from his leter 131 of 1951 to Milt Waldman. No word he used was dropped lightly.
We will not so much address the 'why'. Others have spoken to their opinions of the 'why' ad nauseum...and many take him much farther down
roads he did not tread than he himself itended (in
my opinion). We will leave much of the 'why' to others... and at the end of the day, I expect the 'why' is entirely wrapped up in the actual recipient of the work itself to begin with... only the reader coming to know 'why' Tolkien did what he did IN THEIR PARTICULAR CASE.
Tolkien's work is a very "individual" work. Much of it is common to all. Some of it is specific to each individual absorber of the work.
It is difficult to write a "why" when a work does not (and is not intended to) resonate in the same way for all.