• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

What are you writing about now?

I am writing a Handbook on Tolkien & Sindarin. How to translate the English of Tolkien's LotR into Sindarin. It deals with the linguistics, etymology and analysis of the words, names, places, peoples, and themes in Tolkien's philosophy. I should be finished around 2234, so there is hope - LOL! (actually, I am making very good progress!)
 
Ent Said: 4. The Characters of Tolkien - book: a look at many of the characters, their traits and purpose in the works, and benefits we can extract from looking at them closely.

I am looking forward to seeing this one! My Handbook also will deal with a lot of this kind of elaboration...
 
I have the black and red ink version of the fan-fold stays for Volume One. Think of it as a bardic aide-memoire.
Next step is to make color versions of each badge for the chapter/pov change headings. I'll play around with a colour version of the stays, too.
 

Attachments

  • Book 4 Stays Design Panel 1.jpg
    176.7 KB · Views: 31
  • Book 4 Stays Design Panel 2.jpg
    178 KB · Views: 27
  • Book 4 Stays Design Panel 3.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 30
Oh that's cool! How fun. Look, that's the one thing Tolkien has done for all of us, getting our creative juices flowing! I'm lovin this place!
 
WOOT!!! Looking forward to reading it!
 
I wrote up this blurb to go in the front of Volume 1. It's a short explanation this is a translation of an ancient history and who it is about.

I'm breaking a time-honoured tradition. Typically, the first person mentioned in the story (or the first person with a POV) is the main character.

My main character doesn't show up until page 115, and the readers don't learn her name until page 126.

It's a draft version of the blurb and the layout. I'll experiment with a colour version later.
 

Attachments

  • History of these Histories.pdf
    315.1 KB · Views: 49
Thou Heathenage! How darest thyself go against tradition and change it up drastically in order to titilate your readers? DANG! Now I really gotta read it. LOL!
 
Ill Chances and Strange Fates... has officially reached 100,000 words-- which means it is twice as long as a standard novel and it is now Epic Novel length!
And as an eagerly-onlooking beta reader, I can gleefully assure you all this is only the beginning! 😄
 
Ah fellow laborers in the world of linguistic legerdemain, greetings to you - and please excuse both my absence from - and now my intrusion upon - your decisions about redemption of your time.

Dropping in to share with you a minor thought - a concept really - one I've not considered well in all my editing of others' works, or in my own.

The concept: 'density.'

Now - density is not generally a common issue in narrative fiction. However it can often play a key role in philosophical, theological or reflective writing, nonfiction analytical work, and essays and opinion pieces.

But for those of us involved in narrative fiction, we should still exercise caution. There can, for example, be spots within our narrative fiction where our characters, scenes or situations bear quite a load of concepts, changes, thoughts, similarities or differences we want the reader to keep track of. When this is sprung on them 'suddenly,' out of character with the surrounding text and work, it can actually overload them.

This is part of the 'issue' with Silmarillion for example. It's a lot of 'narrative fiction' - but there's a rather significant load of 'names, peoples, places, etc.' the reader is demanded to keep track of somehow - and we hear the result. "There's just so many names" - or "how can we keep track of all the different elves" - or such.

What we're 'hearing' is the impact of 'density.' The load of 'tracking' being required by the brain.

Why this came up?

A clever editor noticed a significant difference in 'density' between an author's Preface, and his Introduction.
The difference was observable.
The solution was either to reduce the density of the Introduction, or increase the density of the Preface.

The decision: to 'bridge the difference' between the two, because the Preface was 'elegant and engaging' as it was (and needed to be), while the Introduction was 'clear and correct' as a lead-in to the actual work. Neither could rightly 'tolerate' a substantial change.

So by progressively 'increasing' the density of the Preface as it moved to conclusion, the reader was better prepared for the overall higher density of the Introduction.

Ah, the power of words.
I'm done. Just wanted you to know Ent hadn't vanished, or let you off the hook being bored by his contributions..!

If anyoe would like to know more about Density just let him know. He'll toss together a bit of an essay on ot to post over on the Discord in the 'writing' area.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…