• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

What would happen if 🧙Gandalf took on the 💀Nazgul with Frodo?

Frodo claimed the Ring, Sam did not. Also I think that because Frodo had the Ring for a long time, if he put on the Ring inside Mordor, Sauron would have 'seen' him. But Sam, because he didn't have the Ring for a long time was not 'seen' by Sauron.

Yes Sauron did leave the Ring in Barad-dur. Do you really think the last king of Numenor would have left the Ring in a vault when he left for the war on the Valar?!?

If Melkor could not get the Secret Fire for himself, I doubt Celebrimbor could 'use' part of the Secret Fire in G Ring. And no the Sun Cannot = the Secret Fire!! The Secret Fire was there at the begining, Varda (I think) made the Sun. She made it out of the remains of one of the two Trees. Earlier she made the Trees grow. Now if melkor could not get the Secret Fire, how could she? Also I one of you quoted:
"Therefore Ilúvatar gave to their vision Being, and set it amid the Void, and the Secret Fire was sent to burn at the heart of the World; and it was called Eä."
Click to expand...
Now since the Secret Fire was at the heart of the World, HOW CAN IT BE THE SUN??!!?!?!?
 
Sauron took the ring with him to Numenor-he wasn't go to war against the Valar himself.

If the bearer doesn't wear the ring then it is harder to sense them-Elrond and Gandalg don't sense the One Ring when Bilbo was wearing it, and Sam states that if he put the ring on in Mordor Sauron would notice him.
 
Helm, you're right, Gandalf does not wield the Secret Fire. I don't believe I've mixed any of them up so far. Let me know if I have.

Here's the quote again.

'I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the Flame of Anor. You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udun. Go back to the Shadow. You cannot pass!'
Click to expand...
There are three separate fires or flames referenced. Two of them reference good power while one of them references an evil source. Gandalf has two fires on his side while the Balrog only has one.

1. The Secret Fire i.e. Eru, Flame Imperishable, Ilúvatar, The One etc.. Gandalf says he serves Eru.

2. The Flame of Anor. Gandalf claims to wield the flame of anor. Anor means sun so here Gandalf is claiming to wield the light of the sun. I believe this refers to Gandalf's wielding the Ring of Fire but the passage is clearly open to interpretation.

3 The Flame of Udun. Gandalf calls the Balrog a Flame of Udun. Udun was Melkor's first stronghold more commonly called Utumno.
 
Last edited:
Sauron took the ring with him to Numenor
Click to expand...

How do you know this? We have one quote saying Sauron "took up again his great Ring in Barad-dur". While this quote is typically not as clear as I'd like it seems to indicate that Sauron left his ring at home when he went visiting.

1. It may seem unlikely after reading LOTR but Sauron was actually in danger in Numenor. Sauron wouldn't have gone as a hostage if he could have beaten them directly. Sauron would leave the ring at home because he wouldn't want Ar-Pharazôn to seize it.

2. If the ring was at home that would resolve how Sauron got it back after Numenor sank and he became an incorporeal spirit. Once Sauron reformed the ring was right where he left it.
 

I think it's highly unlikely that Sauron would have left his Ring behind--but if he had, he could have left it in the hands of the Nazgul. They seem to be the only servants he completely trusted--he did, after all, send them to retrieve the Ring at the end of the Third Age.

It's more likely, however, that he kept the Ring on his person, but was able to keep it hidden. As he still possessed a "body" at that time, he could afford to rely less upon the Ring's power and more upon his own guile.

As for being an incorporeal spirit after the destruction of Numenor, I don't think this would have prevented him from bearing the Ring. The Nazgul were incorporeal--and at least one of them was expected to bear the Ring back to Sauron, if they had seized it from Frodo.
 
Jeez, why can't you guys be more trusting

 
Narya is the only ring talked about at length in the text of LOTR, as at the council of Elrond.

We cannot be sure of the power of Nenya or Vilya. Other than the catch-all passage about them being "ever at work" enriching life, understanding etc. it doesn't say much else....

IIRC, Vilya is the elder ring, and the heirloom of Ereinion, and actually the most powerful of the Three. And naturally enough belonged to Elrond since the death of G-G.

Cirdan didn't fancy popping off to war, so he gave Gandalf Narya for safe-keeping and in case it helped him defeat Sauron, but I agree that defeating Sauron doesn't mean in the literal sense of using Narya to defeat the One Ring. Not possible surely....?

However, merely the enhancement of Gandalf's "fire" or inner rage, must be counted as a weapon in battle, even if Narya didn't literally fire flaming thunderbolts at orcs etc.



As for the "would Gandalf beat so and so?" question. Thorondor had it right, it clearly states in the text that he saw off the Nine on top of Amon Sul.

Look, if a weatherbeaten old Ranger with a flaming stick can beat them off, then surely a Maiar spirit can kick their asses every time...?!!!

(yes, I am joking. yes, i know they didn't retreat from Strider for the reason given, etc etc)

 

I'm not sure it's that simple. Gandalf could have driven them off, or startled them, sure (and he did). But if he had the power to destroy them, why didn't he (beyond the obvious reason that "Tolkien didn't want it that way," &c. &c.)?
 
I didn't say he had the power to destroy them, just to give them a beating....

They fled from him, when they had no reason to do so.... I think we may just be dealing with a story telling device as you say, rather than a reasoned principle behind who was the stronger etc.
 
It depends, if you mean on there own then...
Nine men V One Maia.

But as it is with effects of rings...

Nine men with a ring each V one maia and a rings(that is better than theres.)

( not taking into acount steeds)

If it was day gandanlf could make them flee.
If it was night... well the nazgul hate fire so gandalf pine cone trik from the hobbit could come in handy. So now the nazgul are shapless( there clothes got burnt), there only power fear and Gandalf cannot fear them as a) his ring and b) the fact he has lived in Aman.
The Nazgul flee or be killed by Glamdring.
 
There are three separate fires or flames referenced.
Click to expand...
I always thought there was one flame, but now I see that there could be two seprate flames. Sorry Entmoot.

...and came back to Middle-earth and to Mordor that was his home. There he took up again his great Ring in Barad-dur
Click to expand...
The 'there' referes to Mordor. The quote then could read: 'In Mordor that was his home, Sauron took up again the ruling Ring.'
He naturally had the One Ring, and so very soon dominated the wills of most Númenoreans.
Click to expand...
Why did he naturally have the Ring? This seems to contradict the previous quote. By the way, where did you get this quote from, Inderjit S?
Sauron took the ring with him to Numenor-he wasn't go to war against the Valar himself.
Click to expand...
The 'he' I was referring to is Ar-Pharazon, the last king of Numenor, not Sauron.

Sam states that if he put the ring on in Mordor Sauron would notice him.
Click to expand...
Yea your right Inderjit S, I was forgeting that.

I thought I read somewhere that there where only 5 Black Riders attacking Gandalf, but I could be mistaken.
 
Last edited:
There are too many "if"-s in the whole question and the only thing we could do is to speculate ......

I think that most probably Gandalf would not have won.Yes,he was a Maia,but let's not forget that he was no allowed to use his "potential".I believe that in an eventual battle between the Nazguls and Olorin who could use all his power and abilities the Nazguls would have lost ,but the situation was quite different.Gandalf was in Middle-earth and he had to stick to his role.....
 
Inderjit S said:
I got the quote from 'Letters of Tolkien', how does it contradict the previous statement?
Click to expand...
So, Sauron had the Ring in Numenor, than he reterned to Mordor and took up his Ring again in Barad-dur?!?!? I have something, then I go somewhere else and take it up. Either I had it at the begining or I didn't, right. If I had it at the begining, how could I pick it up again? If I didn't have it at the begining, then I could pick it up. Therefore I could have it at the begining, or I did not have it to start out with. Thus the two statments are contradictary.
 
Interesting, but I do not see that that deffinition must be the case. Also we may have stumbled on mystery?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Similar threads

Did 🧙Gandalf not return to Frodo before after 17 years?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Eljorahir
Why is Frodo special?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Klaatu
B
Why didn't 🧙Gandalf surrender to the Mouth of 👁️Sauron?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Klaatu
Why is 🧙Gandalf The White indistinguishable from Gandalf the Grey?
Replies
11
Views
4K
Ricardo
R
B
How would the 💀Nazgul able to keep pestering Frodo to put on the Ring?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Ais
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…