BalrogRingDestroyer
Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2018
- Messages
- 267
I get he fully didn't know WHAT they were but I think it's likely, even before meeting Strider, that he knew WHERE they were from. As such, he should have realized that these Black Riders were quite capable of killing any Hobbit, including innocent bystanders, that crossed their path, particularly if they were seen as being protecting of Frodo.
As such, why didn't he outright tell at least Merry and Pippin, whom he had no clue already knew what the Ring was, when they kept narrowly avoiding the Riders and having to go off the road? (Actually, the fact that we know Pippin is so incredibly inquisitive, the fact that he's not questioning Frodo to death about the Riders and all should have been a giveaway to him that Pippin already knew about the Ring and had at least a slight guess as to WHERE the Riders were from. Then again, his desire (unless it was Merry) to go stop at Shire inns with the Riders on their tail does show that either he's a fool or not really realizing exactly what the Riders are after all. (Then again, maybe a Black Rider might not check an inn, especially if it was told that Frodo was going to Buckland.)
I could see why the Hobbits wouldn't have gone telling WHAT they had while in Bree, where there were Men who were a lot more vulnerable to the influence of the Ring, but, other than Lotho or maybe Ted Sandyman (who also seemed like a rascal) and maybe Lobelia, most of the Shire would probably have been far more resistant to the allure of the Ring than even mighty men like Boromir.
I think the more in the Shire knew what danger they were in, they would been able to keep Frodo safer plus keep the Riders at bay longer, thinking Frodo was still in Buckland, making the close call in Bree not happen. Heck, with just a slight delay of the Riders, it's possible that the Hobbits and Strider could have crossed paths with Gandalf before Rivendell and Frodo may not have gotten that wound. But, then again, if they had made it safely to Rivendell without having to send the river on the horses, those Rider things would still be abroad and that would actually have greatly hampered the Fellowship of the Ring.)
As such, why didn't he outright tell at least Merry and Pippin, whom he had no clue already knew what the Ring was, when they kept narrowly avoiding the Riders and having to go off the road? (Actually, the fact that we know Pippin is so incredibly inquisitive, the fact that he's not questioning Frodo to death about the Riders and all should have been a giveaway to him that Pippin already knew about the Ring and had at least a slight guess as to WHERE the Riders were from. Then again, his desire (unless it was Merry) to go stop at Shire inns with the Riders on their tail does show that either he's a fool or not really realizing exactly what the Riders are after all. (Then again, maybe a Black Rider might not check an inn, especially if it was told that Frodo was going to Buckland.)
I could see why the Hobbits wouldn't have gone telling WHAT they had while in Bree, where there were Men who were a lot more vulnerable to the influence of the Ring, but, other than Lotho or maybe Ted Sandyman (who also seemed like a rascal) and maybe Lobelia, most of the Shire would probably have been far more resistant to the allure of the Ring than even mighty men like Boromir.
I think the more in the Shire knew what danger they were in, they would been able to keep Frodo safer plus keep the Riders at bay longer, thinking Frodo was still in Buckland, making the close call in Bree not happen. Heck, with just a slight delay of the Riders, it's possible that the Hobbits and Strider could have crossed paths with Gandalf before Rivendell and Frodo may not have gotten that wound. But, then again, if they had made it safely to Rivendell without having to send the river on the horses, those Rider things would still be abroad and that would actually have greatly hampered the Fellowship of the Ring.)

