• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

The Vanyar: wise or otherwise?

During the greater part of the First Age...

  • the Vanyar had excellent reason for not going to aid the people sooner.

    Votes: 29 74.4%
  • the Vanyar had no good excuse for not joining the Noldor.

    Votes: 10 25.6%

  • Total voters
    39
Joined
Apr 19, 2002
Messages
4,431
We know the Vanyar were friends of the Noldor in Valinor, and would have dwelt together if not for the Vanyar wishing to live in the light of the trees whereas the Noldor wanted the stars. Now the Vanyar sat in Valinor for hundreds of years knowing that their friends, the Noldor, were in Middle-earth fighting a losing battle, yet they did not go to aid them until Earendil showed up and the Valar decided it was time.

Was this failure for so many years to leave Aman and join the Noldor in Middle-earth done out of wisdom or out of selfishness, cowardice, foolishness or any other bad reasons?
 
Hehe, Nom, you have asked a question that is super-loaded with your personal opinion. :D

But you are right! IMO, these fellows were all that you call them: "selfish, egoistic, flat-minded" (is there such a word combination?! :D)
IMO, their behaviour is more than irritating. At least I see it this way! And on the other hand.......I wonder........ wasn't that a wise move on behalf of the Valar ? - "devide and rule" (didn't dare to give the Latin version... was not very sure about the endings of the words :p )......Who says that the Romans had first said this?

And another question comes to my mind:
All right, they stayed in the light of the trees... and when the trees were gone? :p
And what if they stayed close to Manwe and the rest of the Valar?! Oh! They became very highly learned! So??? What's the purpose of knowing very much and not share this knowledge with the others?
Foolish to me it seems (as Yoda might have put it :D)

So, in other words, I fully agree that it was selfish and egoistic on behalf of the Vanyar to stay away from the turmoil of the events and away from the deeds of their kin.
 
Posted by Nom
Now the Vanyar sat in Valinor for hundreds of years knowing that their friends, the Noldor, were in Middle-earth fighting a losing battle,

Wasn't Valinor fenced against all the news from Middle-Earth?
I don't think that while the wars in Beleriand were going on, the Vanyar or the Tirion Noldo knew about the condition of the Wars in Middle-Earth.

Posted by Nom
Was this failure for so many years to leave Aman and join the Noldor in Middle-earth done out of wisdom or out of selfishness, cowardice, foolishness or any other bad reasons?

No I don't think so It was failure. Noldor had afterall, breached The valarian laws and as a result Valar had banned them from their continent. So Noldor were no more then convicts in the eyes of most of the Valar and due to the Vanyar closeness to Valar, the valarian view of the rebellion would have effected Vanyar too.
Besides I don't know If any news from Beleriand were reaching Aman during the first age, except perhaps the Eagle's of Manwe.
It wasn't certainly Cowardice, or else they wouldn't have participated in War of Wrath, not foolishness since what Noldor did was foolishness and not anyother bad reason.
The Vanyar just thought that what Noldor did was horribly wrong.
Posted by Lhunithiel
All right, they stayed in the light of the trees... and when the trees were gone?

Part of their reason in dwelling on around Tantiquetil and Valmar was because of their love for Valar, or so I think.
 
Hey Lhun, who said I think it was not wise? :D

Wasn't Valinor fenced against all the news from Middle-Earth?
I don't think that while the wars in Beleriand were going on, the Vanyar or the Tirion Noldo knew about the condition of the Wars in Middle-Earth.

But I know you think they knew about the Doom of The Noldor, since you gave that as Amarie's reason for soemthing in another thread.

Besides I don't know If any news from Beleriand were reaching Aman during the first age, except perhaps the Eagle's of Manwe.

Do you suppose the Vanyar thought the Noldor were getting along very well in Middle-earth?

No I don't think so It was failure. Noldor had afterall, breached The valarian laws and as a result Valar had banned them from their continent. So Noldor were no more then convicts in the eyes of most of the Valar and due to the Vanyar closeness to Valar, the valarian view of the rebellion would have effected Vanyar too.

Even though Aman was shut against the Noldor, they were still friends, so why not help them?

No more than convicts? Does this mean they were not worthy of aid?

But this is where it gets interesting:

It wasn't certainly Cowardice, or else they wouldn't have participated in War of Wrath

Nay. Why did they wait until the Valar gave them permission? Affraid to go against the counsel of the Valar?

not foolishness since what Noldor did was foolishness and not anyother bad reason.
It was foolish of the Noldor because they returned in such haste. The Vanyar didn't need to do this, they could have taken several years to get there.

Was going to Middle-earth to regain the silmarils and avange Finwe's death, and have their own realms bad reasons? I do not think so.

Would it have been a bad reason for the Vanyar to go help their friends? I do not see how.

The inaction of the Vanyar may not be foolish, but I do not understand your reasons for why it was not.

The Vanyar just thought that what Noldor did was horribly wrong.

They still cared about the Noldor as friends though, right? I mean, they did go fight for them later. Sure the kinslaying was horribly wrong, but not all of the Noldor did this. What else was horribly wrong... that Feanor went against the Valar's counsel? So what? He's allowed to.
 
Fenced?
No news?

Oooooh! No!

Aman was quite well informed on everything going on in ME!
Gods!! They knew it all very well!

But this is not the question. The question is why the Vanyar did nothing fo ages!

Some may call it a wisdom. It might be viewd that way.

"Why go and fight and experience misfortunes, wars, misery, grief...
We're so cozy and comfortable in here...


I call it egoism.

You know, when I think about it all...... Don't you just see the reflection of our own society? :rolleyes:

Some - waiting for things to happen while others - making thing happen!

Is it wrong to manifest your free will? I think - not! That's why I can not blame the Noldor for disobaying the Valar's orders and no matter how disastrous the result was, I still respect them, starting right from Feanor, for what they did.

And if the Gods AND the Vanyar were not that selfish the result might have been not that disastrous after all!!!
 
I think the Vanyar were the Manwe of the Eldalie. They were the holy elves, and I suppose they would not ever go against the Valar. I believe this was probably due to fear of getting on their bad side as it was to any wisdom that might have played a part. Probably wisdom in the form of Manwe letting Ingwe in on some information. But could such fear of getting on the bad side of the Valar be considered cowardice?

Surely the Vanyar did care about the Noldor, just not enough to defy the Valar.

Now suppose the Vanyar had left Valinor... then what? Well they would be shut out, at least for a time, and perhaps they feared that in specific.

Did they just not want to loose the bliss of Valinor or instruction of the Valar?

But as for getting on the bad side of the Valar... just exactly what what be the Vanyar's loss or pain in this? Might they just look up to Manwe and Varda... seeking their aproval in all that they do, and so have feared to have their own feelings hurt by disapointing the Valar? What exactly was so bad about going against the Valar that it overrides their friendship and care for the Noldor?


I do not blame the Noldor either, Lhun. Though the kinslaying was way out of line.

Some - waiting for things to happen while others - making thing happen!
I think the Vanyar just didn't care if things happend, or didn't even want things to happen. They were content in the light of the trees and probably grew contect again, to still dwell with the Valar. In the published Sil we read that it was because they were content that they did not trust Melkor, though in LQ it says that Ulmo warned them, and the way I read it, he didn't warn the Noldor. But that is a whole 'nother thread.
 
Answer

Posted by Nom
But I know you think they knew about the Doom of The Noldor, since you gave that as Amarie's reason for soemthing in another thread.

They could have known about it because the Doom of Noldor was pronounced within Aman, and before Finarfin's host retreated.

Posted by Nom
Do you suppose the Vanyar thought the Noldor were getting along very well in Middle-earth?

Hmm...It seems to me that I was wrong presuming that no news travelled to Aman during the ban....

Posted by Nom
Even though Aman was shut against the Noldor, they were still friends, so why not help them?

And get themselves meshed up in the doom of Noldor and be eventually destroyed? Everyone who helped Noldor in Beleriand got mixed up in their doom and was harmed a great deal.
They were friends no doubt but Olwe and the Noldor were more friendlier to eachother due to their close assosiation, and yet Olwe tried to disuade Feanor from going after Morgoth.

Silmarillion, Of the Flight of Noldo
'We renounce no friendship. But it may be the part of a friend to rebuke a friend's folly. And when the Noldor welcomed us and gave us aid, otherwise then you spoke: in the land of Aman we were to dwell for ever, as brothers whose houses stand side by side.

Olwe's words explain it for both Vanyar and Teleri.
Sure they were friends of Noldor, but It would be great folly to join in the folly of someone, whether be foe or friend.

And here the main point is that Noldor assention to Middle-Earth was wrong and ruinous.

posted by Nom
No more than convicts? Does this mean they were not worthy of aid?

Aid? They were provided with aid enough inform of good council, yet they didn't listen to it. Besides Vanyar, knew because of their own greater wisdom, and the foresite and proclaimanations of Valar knew that the Quest of Noldor was fruitless and ruinous and It would be folly and disaster to join in it.

Posted by Nom
Nay. Why did they wait until the Valar gave them permission? Affraid to go against the counsel of the Valar?

Yes, afraid to go against the council of Valar...and their was wisdom in It. Valar were generally more foresited and wise then the Elves and thus could be trusted to make better decisions then the Elves. (Not always the best, but I have used the word generally)

Posted by Nom
It was foolish of the Noldor because they returned in such haste. The Vanyar didn't need to do this, they could have taken several years to get there.

It was foolish of the Noldor to listen to the lies of Morgoth. It was foolish of the Noldor to listen and believe on Feanor's words. It was foolish of the Noldor to follow Feanor after the Prophecy of Mandos and after the advice/order of Manwe. It was foolish of Feanor to swear such oaths and commit the Kinslaying of Aqualonde, and cause the first battle to happen on Aman.
And such fair, noble and wise Elves as Vanyar couldn't be thought of backing such toomfoolery.

Posted by Nom
Was going to Middle-earth to regain the silmarils and avange Finwe's death, and have their own realms bad reasons?

Remember that It was Feanor that motivated and instigated the flight of the Noldor, and he did that for his own reasons; mainly to regain the Silmaril's. Yet, he was counceled wisely to not commit such an act as to follow Morgoth into Middle-Earth (Because that would be what Morgoth want, coming of Elves to Middle-Earth, his stronghold, where he could easily destroy them.) If Noldor would have waited and would have asked the help of Valar, events would have faishoned better.

Posted by Nom
Would it have been a bad reason for the Vanyar to go help their friends? I do not see how.
Well whether you can see it or not, that depends upon you. But I think It is crystal clear. The Noldor were doomed in Beleriand, and the Vanyar knew this too, and to aid them in arms and numbers would have meant destruction.

Posted by Nom
The inaction of the Vanyar may not be foolish, but I do not understand your reasons for why it was not.
My reasons are clear enough.

Posted by Lhun
You know, when I think about it all...... Don't you just see the reflection of our own society?

Their is somethings called prudence and wisdom. And Vanyar were aware of these.

Posted by Lhun
"Why go and fight and experience misfortunes, wars, misery, grief...
We're so cozy and comfortable in here...

Their is nothing wrong with such attitude, specially if Wars, misfortune, grief is self-inflicted, as was the in the case of Noldor.

Posted by Lhun
Is it wrong to manifest tour free will? I think - not! That's why I can not blame the Noldor for disobaying the Valar's orders and no matter how disastrous the result was, I still respect them, starting right from Feanor, for what they did.

You might respect them, adore them, I might do the same, we might back the claim of free-will and usage of it but none of these change the fact that what Noldor did was basically wrong, disastrous and uncalled for.


Posted by Lhun
And if the Gods AND the Vanyar were not that selfish the result might have been not that disastrous after all!!!

Selfish!!!
Lhun, care to explain their 'selfishness' in this matter?
 
Well whether you can see it or not, that depends upon you. But I think It is crystal clear. The Noldor were doomed in Beleriand, and the Vanyar knew this too, and to aid them in arms and numbers would have meant destruction.
I said I do not see how aiding their friends is a bad reason to go to Middle-earth, I didn't mean that it was enough reason to overrule all the reasons against going.


Aid? They were provided with aid enough inform of good council, yet they didn't listen to it.
Yes, but this aid came before the Doom of the Noldor. After this they were in a new situation that would require fresh aid.

It was foolish of the Noldor to listen to the lies of Morgoth. It was foolish of the Noldor to listen and believe on Feanor's words. It was foolish of the Noldor to follow Feanor after the Prophecy of Mandos and after the advice/order of Manwe. It was foolish of Feanor to swear such oaths and commit the Kinslaying of Aqualonde, and cause the first battle to happen on Aman.
And such fair, noble and wise Elves as Vanyar couldn't be thought of backing such toomfoolery.

Those foolish things were reasons for the rebellion, and I do not ask why the Vanyar did not take part in this, but why they sat in Aman all those years until Earendil showed up.

If Noldor would have waited and would have asked the help of Valar, events would have faishoned better.

Right, but once they were doomed the Vanyar did not help them.

My reasons are clear enough.

They are now...

The Vanyar trusted to the wisdom of the Valar and had much wisdom themselves.

...but you didn't give them in your first post.

I think those could be the reasons too, but I find it hard to swallow... which is why I opened this thread. I am inclined to believe the Vanyar erred in not coming to the aid of the Noldor. But as I said in my last post, they are the holy elves. They did trust the Valar, and were different in nature than the Noldor, they are such that I can't fully understand them.

I try to put myself in their position (with my ways of thinking of course, not theirs since I can not understand it) and I just imagine I would not have trusted to the Valar as much as they did. Because of this, I have little respect for that trust. They punish all the exiles... many of which only went along to aid those who they knew were going into folly. It is admirable that some of the Noldor went wittingly in great danger for the sake of those others who would not be restrained. Why didn't the Valar just aid the Noldor anyhow, regaining the trust of those few who didn't trust them, and forgive those who would repent?

Maybe all the Vanyar could have gone to Middle-earth and things would have turned out just as bad, and maybe even the Vanyar trusted this would be the case, but why not try anyhow? Why not do the sort of thing that Finrod did? How can you bear to sit there while your friends are at war with Morgoth?

But, I have a hard time believing that the Vanyar of Aman arriving in Middle-earth would not have been enough to whoop Morgoth.

Imagine if they came marching over Hilthlum as Fingon's host was heading off to Nirnaeth.

And remember Ulmo's words to Tuor... the walls of doom can be breached.

I find it easier to understand the Vanyar fearing to make the Valar unhappy, than to understand how they would have so much trust that they do not go help their friends.

On the other hand, it might go along with being most holy to trust blindly. I could maybe understand trusting in Eru, but why the Valar.
 
Sure, I'd call the Vanyar types wise. Is walking into a disaster wise? Yay for self-preservation, I say!
 
...we shall see that the heroic Noldor were the best possible weapon with which to keep Morgoth at bay, virtually besieged, and at any rate fully occupied, on the northern fringe of Middle-Earth, without provoking him into a frenzy of nihilistic destruction. And in the meanwhile, Men... were raised to their fullest achievable stature, and by the two marriages the transference to them, or infusion into Mankind, of the noblest Elf-strain was accomplished, in readiness for the still distant, but inevitably approaching, days when the Elves would "fade."
The last intervention with physical force by the Valar, ending in the breaking of Thangorodrim, may then be viewed as not in fact reluctant or even unduly delayed, but timed with precision. The intervention came before the annihilation of the Eldar and the Edain. Morgoth though locally triumphant had neglected most of Middle-Earth during the war; and by it he had in fact been weakened... above all in mind. He had become absorbed in "kingship," and though a tyrant of ogre-size and monstrous power, this was a vast fall even from his former wickedness of hate, and his terrible nihilism. He had fallen to like being a tyrant-king with conquered slaves, and vast obedient armies.
The war was successful, and ruin was limited to the small (if beautiful) region of Beleriand. - 402-403, Morgoth's Ring
The Valar had good reason for waiting, as this quote shows. Because Morgoth had such a terrible grip on the physical world, and he desired destruction above all else, enormous material ruin was inevitable whenever he was confronted physically. Unless swiftly successful, any war against Morgoth could result in the decimation of all Middle-earth. The Vanyar's trust in the Valar would thus be justified.
 
The converse of Manwë and Eru

There were many such fëar of Elves who had died in Middle-earth gathered in the Halls of Mandos, but it was not until the death of Míriel in Aman that Manwë appealed directly to Eru for counsel. Eru 'accepted and ratified the position' - though making it plain to Manwë that the Valar should have contested Melkor's domination of Middle-earth far earlier, and that they had lacked estel

from the Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth

I think this shows that no they were not wise....unless I have the whole time period wrong from which this quote applies which I dont think I do but I might. If Eru himself says you lack estel...you lack estel.
 
Yup, You seem to have got the whole time period wrong.
The Quote concerns a time period which is earlier then the rebellion of Noldor.
 
Originally posted by Lhunithiliel
"selfish, egoistic, flat-minded" (is there such a word combination?! :D)


So, in other words, I fully agree that it was selfish and egoistic on behalf of the Vanyar to stay away from the turmoil of the events and away from the deeds of their kin.
I like these words.
The Vanyar prefered the easy life,they chose to forget everything,to forget what had happened in Valinor.Such decison can be made only by selfish and egoistic persons,who are afraid of losing what they have.
 
What your quote does show Feanorian, is that the Valar, even according to Iluvatar were capable of making serious mistakes.

The Noldor knew this.

Did the Vanyar?

If so, why did they trust the Valar as much as they did?

What exactly prevent any of them from saying: 'You know what? Forget this! My friends are dying in Middle-earth and the Valar who failed to stop Morgoth earlier as should have been done, are letting them, and regardless of whether Morgoth will be stopped before he takes over Arda, I am going to aid my friends.'


The problem I have with the Valar leaving Morgoth in Middle-earth to cause ruin during the first age is: What were their plans before the Noldor rebelled? After the darkening of Valinor the Valar did chase Morgoth but he was able to lose them. What were they going to do when they found him? Ask him politely if he would cease being a nihilistic root of all evil and come over to the good side?

The last intervention with physical force by the Valar, ending in the breaking of Thangorodrim, may then be viewed as not in fact reluctant or even unduly delayed, but timed with precision.
May it really now? Was that the reasoning of the Valar? Let him wear himself out on the people of Middle-earth, and then swoop in and wipe him out?

Then did they know the Noldor would rebel, commit something for which they would be doomed to distruction thereby giving the Valar a reason to allow the Noldor and other people of Middle-earth to fight alone and see defeat?

If this really was the reason of the Valar (and I will argue that it was not) then did the Vanyar know it? And if so, what did they think of this? What did they think of the Valar letting the Noldor and other more innocent people be tormented by Morgoth while they sat in safety?

Or were the Vanyar a bunch of authority-worthshipping, followers who rather let the Valar do all their thinking for them?

Or was there just something so holy about the Vanyar that is beyond my understanding. Is it a holy thing to not question the Valar?
 
Right, but once they were doomed the Vanyar did not help them.

I can agree with this pretty cryptic statement.

I think those could be the reasons too, but I find it hard to swallow... which is why I opened this thread. I am inclined to believe the Vanyar erred in not coming to the aid of the Noldor. But as I said in my last post, they are the holy elves. They did trust the Valar, and were different in nature than the Noldor, they are such that I can't fully understand them.

Perhaps you are viewing things from a more Noldorion point of view? :p I mean If I were a Noldor, and even If my reasons for leaving weren't entirely justified, and I knew that still I would feel a tiny bit of remorse that my friends didn't help me.

I try to put myself in their position (with my ways of thinking of course, not theirs since I can not understand it) and I just imagine I would not have trusted to the Valar as much as they did. Because of this, I have little respect for that trust.
That are your thoughts. They can't be justified, as you yourself admit.

They punish all the exiles... many of which only went along to aid those who they knew were going into folly.
The exiles all, willingly accepted their doom, and thus all were equally responsible, with the possible exception of Fëanor and kin.
It is admirable that some of the Noldor went wittingly in great danger for the sake of those others who would not be restrained.

It is admirable in the foolish sense. I can see what you are getting at though. You are asking the Vanyar to join the rebels due to basically the same reasons which made some of the least willing Noldor accompany their kinsmen to Middle-Earth.
The less willing Noldo had more reason to follow the rebels. Firstly, Fëanor and Fingolfin their Kings were going in Exile and they were compelled to follow their lead if they wanted to remain obediant. Secondly the sense of Clan and family is very strong among the Elves, and Noldor would have felt more compelled to join their kinsmen.
Why didn't the Valar just aid the Noldor anyhow, regaining the trust of those few who didn't trust them, and forgive those who would repent?
To the Valar was committed overlordship of Arda, and the Elves knew that, which made Elves come under their jurisdiction and the Elves needed to obey their commands. But the Elves choose to ignore them and disobeyed the Valar. And even then you expect the Valar to help those who disobeyed them and broke friendship with them. Because Manwë forced [by power] none to turn back. In the doom of Noldor Valar had no part. The Valar basically left the rebel's alone, because it was Fëanor who so proudly had claimed that Elves would be better off without the help of Valar. And you still expect them to help Fëanor and those who followed him? The Valar were just in their treatment of the exiles, not perhaps entirely correct, but just.
Their are a few other factors too, like Valar helping the rebels would mean that the Valar have overlooked the terrible crime, the first kinslaying.
Maybe all the Vanyar could have gone to Middle-earth and things would have turned out just as bad, and maybe even the Vanyar trusted this would be the case, but why not try anyhow?
Because trying would yeild nothing except destruction of the noble and fair Vanyar.
Why not do the sort of thing that Finrod did? How can you bear to sit there while your friends are at war with Morgoth?
That's taking friendship to extreme and on the fringe of insanity. You won't except a Vanyar to jump in something which is not only unlawful but cursed too.
The Shibboleth of Fëanor tells us about the reasons of Finrod.
Finrod was like his father in his fair face and golden hair, and also in noble and generous heart, though he had the high courage of the Ñoldor and in his youth their eagerness and unrest; and he had also from his Telerin mother a love of the sea and dreams of far lands that he had never seen.

She was proud, strong, and self-willed, as were all the descendants of Finwë save Finarfin; and like her brother Finrod, of all her kin the nearest to her heart, she had dreams of far lands and dominions that might be her own to order as she would without tutelage
Thus dominon of lands was also a reason behind Finrod's reason of departure.
I hardly think the example of Finrod jumping in with all these haughty princes is a lesson in Wisdom.
But, I have a hard time believing that the Vanyar of Aman arriving in Middle-earth would not have been enough to whoop Morgoth.
And I have a hard time believeing that it would have done any good. Becuase you see, if the battle were to be won by number and in fight, then the Noldor with the aid of Sindar and allies would have defeated Morgoth, [seeing that only the treachery of men kept them from winning Nirnaeth]Morgoth would never be overcome, that is gates of Thongrodium broken and Morgoth captured. Victory would still have eluded them, which wasn't possible without the intervention of Ainur.
Imagine if they came marching over Hilthlum as Fingon's host was heading off to Nirnaeth.
A fanfic is in order-right?;)
I would have loved it but guess Tolkien is not the one to care much about dramatic twists.

And remember Ulmo's words to Tuor... the walls of doom can be breached.
To what extent?
On the other hand, it might go along with being most holy to trust blindly. I could maybe understand trusting in Eru, but why the Valar.
Because with all their fault, Valar are more wise and powerful then me or you.
Oh and as for the Passage from Myths Transformed ModAddi showed, the reasons showed their indeed present Valar as possessing no love for either Eldar or Atani. That's characteristic of Valar is more Eru like if you ask me, coldness personified.
Posted by Gil-GaladThe Vanyar prefered the easy life,they chose to forget everything,to forget what had happened in Valinor.Such decison can be made only by selfish and egoistic persons,who are afraid of losing what they have.
I am afraid Gil-galad, but this has to be one of the most boisterous and unwarranted statements I have read in a while.
Guess your enthusiasm got the better of you. Forget what? What exactly had happened in Valinor? The slaying of the two trees, but Vanyar lamented for their loss more then Noldor. So you think because Vanyar were wise, had care for their families and had the sense of choosing between right and wrong and trying to avoid the influence of Arda marred, makes them selfish and egoistic persons who are afraid of losing what they have? I find this pretty strange.
Posted by NomThe Noldor knew this.

Did the Vanyar?
Why wouldn't they know? The Vanyar had been graced with a mind by Eru and I am sure they had enough mental capabilites to assertain certain faults of Valar.
Posted by Nom
If so, why did they trust the Valar as much as they did?
They did this because they also knew that Valar were being made, in relative powers of incarnate body and more, greater then the Children of Eru and thus were more wise then them. If you look objectively, the Valar had done a whole lot for the Eldar. They had made war upon Morgoth just to ensure that the Eldar Children could be saved from the shadow. That in itself was enough for the Vanyar to merit great trust of Valar.

Posted by NomWhat exactly prevent any of them from saying: 'You know what? Forget this! My friends are dying in Middle-earth and the Valar who failed to stop Morgoth earlier as should have been done, are letting them, and regardless of whether Morgoth will be stopped before he takes over Arda, I am going to aid my friends.'

This matter is being discussed in a debate so I'll refrain from making any comments right now.
Posted by NomThe problem I have with the Valar leaving Morgoth in Middle-earth to cause ruin during the first age is: What were their plans before the Noldor rebelled? After the darkening of Valinor the Valar did chase Morgoth but he was able to lose them. What were they going to do when they found him? Ask him politely if he would cease being a nihilistic root of all evil and come over to the good side?
What they did afterwards, execute his incarnate self and banish him to the void.

Posted by Nom
May it really now? Was that the reasoning of the Valar? Let him wear himself out on the people of Middle-earth, and then swoop in and wipe him out?

Note:Nóm is refering to the passage ModAddi Posted.
I don't agree with this reasoning and I am not rooting for it.
Posted by Nóm
Or were the Vanyar a bunch of authority-worthshipping, followers who rather let the Valar do all their thinking for them?
Nothing of that sort! Were you in a bad mode when you wrote this?

Posted by NómOr was there just something so holy about the Vanyar that is beyond my understanding. Is it a holy thing to not question the Valar?
It is 'holy' not to Question the Valar when it is evident that Valar's stand on something is just and warranted.
 
The exiles all, willingly accepted their doom, and thus all were equally responsible, with the possible exception of Fëanor and kin.

Why were the Noldor cursed? If it was for kinslaying then it should have been something that would not punish all of them if it is to be fair.

You are asking the Vanyar to join the rebels due to basically the same reasons which made some of the least willing Noldor accompany their kinsmen to Middle-Earth.
I am not asking them to, I am wondering why they did not.

The less willing Noldo had more reason to follow the rebels. Firstly, Fëanor and Fingolfin their Kings were going in Exile and they were compelled to follow their lead if they wanted to remain obediant.

I think you misrepresent Fingolfin here. Fingolfin's people would not forsake him if he would go with them. It seems his people, though not willing to take Feanor as King, wanted to go back to Middle-earth all the same. I think I brought this up in the Flight of the Noldor chapter discussion.
Fingolfin went into exile in part because his people wanted to go, because Fingon urged him, because of his words to Feanor, and some other things, but the point is that his people wanted to go.

That's taking friendship to extreme and on the fringe of insanity.
But as I asked: How can you bear to sit there while your friends are at war with Morgoth?

You won't except a Vanyar to jump in something which is not only unlawful but cursed too.
Was it unlawful for the Vanyar to leave Aman?

Victory would still have eluded them, which wasn't possible without the intervention of Ainur.
Well Morgoth's minions could have been defeated.

Fingolfin seriously wounded Morgoth, why couldn't enough elves slay him? He was just a really big bad guy.

I would have loved it but guess Tolkien is not the one to care much about dramatic twists.
Huh!?


When I said: "Why not do the sort of thing that Finrod did?" I ment, why not go to Middle-earth and do what good they could.

To what extent?
I don't know.

But if something as drastic as a couple people taking a silmaril from Morgoth's crown could contribute to the end of Morgoth, why not something as drastic and generous as the Vanyar coming to aid the people of Middle-earth of their own free will?

What they did afterwards, execute his incarnate self and banish him to the void.
But nay, not if you believe the Valar left the Noldor in Middle-earth for those reasons that Tolkien says 'may then be viewed...'

In taking what a said a piece at a time it is getting out of context. I was asking what they planned to do with Morgoth as part of my arguement against the idea that the Valar wittingly left the Noldor and other people in Middle-earth alone against Morgoth with the purpose of letting Morgoth waste his power to the extent that he was weak enough to take down without going into that nilhilistic fit that might have messed up the world.


Nothing of that sort! Were you in a bad mode when you wrote this?
No, I just like rebels who are justified, and dislike failure to at least question authority.

It is 'holy' not to Question the Valar when it is evident that Valar's stand on something is just and warranted.
But if it was not evident or belived that the action is just or warranted, then is it okay to question them?

What if the action/inaction was apparantly foolish?

I am leaning more in the direction the Vanyar were inactive out of blind trust and adoration of the Valar rather than out of truly knowing that their aid would not have been of great use. Mostly because I think their aid would have been of great use. I can't see how it would not have been.
 
In taking what a said a piece at a time it is getting out of context. I was asking what they planned to do with Morgoth as part of my arguement against the idea that the Valar wittingly left the Noldor and other people in Middle-earth alone against Morgoth with the purpose of letting Morgoth waste his power to the extent that he was weak enough to take down without going into that nilhilistic fit that might have messed up the world.
I think you are missing the point Nom. Had the Valar immediately made war upon Morgoth, everyone would have died. The entire WORLD would have died. And anyway, it wasn't just about Morgoth. It was about the Atanatari. The Valar could not bring them to Aman and teach them the way they did the Eldar. They knew they had to take care of mortal men somehow. So when the Fathers of Men wandered into Beleriand it must have seemed like an excellent opportunity to have Mankind "raised to their fullest achievable stature, and by the two marriages the transference to them, or infusion into Mankind, of the noblest Elf-strain was accomplished, in readiness for the still distant, but inevitably approaching, days when the Elves would 'fade.'" Tolkien said it. If Tolkien says the Valar knew what they were doing, then the Valar knew what they were doing. They COULD NOT go to war with Morgoth immediately lest the entire world be destroyed. Everything had to be planned to a nicety. Things would be seriously screwed up had the Vanyar left for Middle-Earth.

But that's not the subject of the discussion, is it? As far as I know Tolkien wrote nothing directly concerning the Vanyar's motivations. So who says the Vanyar didn't question the Valar? Who says Ingwe didn't ascend to the summit of Taniquetil one day and ask Manwe "What the hell are you doing!? Everyone is dying in Middle-Earth! Why aren't you people helping them?" And Manwe would answer. There is a difference between questioning authority and rebelling against it.
 
That is not what I ment HelplessModAddi.
I am not saying the world would not have been broken had the Valar fought with Morgoth at the time of the rebellion of the Noldor. I am saying that I find it hard to buy that this was the motivation of the Valar. If they knew they could not fight with Morgoth because his power was still too great, then what were their plans before the Noldor rebellion. Even after the marshaling of the hosts in Tirion, Manwe thought that Feanor would not be able to hold sway over the Noldor. So, what did the Valar think would happen? If it pretty much had to work out the way it did, and I'm not saying it didn't have to, I just ask what were the Valar thinking before? After the darkening the Valar tried to hunt down Morgoth, but if battle with him would have broke the world and Valar knew this then what were they planning to do when they found him? Where they trying to catch him crossing the sea and take him captive there, thinking that a battle at that location would not break the world?

The Valar must have had something in mind if that was their reason. I am aware of the impact that the Noldor in Middle-earth had and that this was a necessary thing, I only question the motives of the Valar.

Yes, Ingwe may have questioned Manwe, in fact I'd bet that he did. But when I say question authority I mean question authority itself not just to question those in authority. I wonder if the Vanyar really understood things or if they just took the Valar's word because it was the Valar's word. And if the Valar did know that the Noldor being at war with Morgoth was needed to wear Morgoth down, what might the Vanyar have thought of this? The whole thing would seem funny to me.
 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top