• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Other Ainur?

Illuin

Fire On The Mountain
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
1,014
Aside from the Valar and Maiar who entered into Eä, are there actually other individual "Ainur" that roam the Halls of Eru outside the realm of time and space? I have always thought of the Ainulindalë as Eru’s creative thought process; and the Music Of The Ainur representing Eru taking a step back and listening to (reflecting on) his own thoughts (i.e. listening to the music). When he was satisfied with his ideas/plans regarding his upcoming creative "project" (Eä and Arda), he visualized how the finished product might look (The Vision) in his mind; much like a painter visualizes his finished painting before he begins to paint (though it may look quite different when he is finished with the "actual" painting). Setting things in motion, he then permitted some of his finest brainchildren ;) (creative thoughts) to leave his mind as individual entities (Valar and Maiar) and enter into time and space (Eä) and serve as his creative tools (or paintbrushes) as it were. Do you think the "other" Ainur mentioned who did not enter Eä (time and space) are simply thoughts that remain in the mind of Eru; rather than (literally isolated) individual entities that are roaming around outside of time and space? Other than the mind of Eru, what really is outside of time and space anyway (time and space pretty much covers everything, does it not :p)? And what in fact is "The Void"? Is The Void actually within the mind of Eru, symbolic of a "place" where Eru blots out bad thoughts (Ainur) and stores them in the very back of his mind? :D
 
I think they're separate derivative entities based upon what's stated in the Ainulindalë.

Cheers,

Úlairi.
 
Are you hittin' the road for a few days? What's up with the short duplicate posts?

PS - You never chimed back in with your Air, Fire, Water thread either :p
 
Are you hittin' the road for a few days? What's up with the short duplicate posts?

PS - You never chimed back in with your Air, Fire, Water thread either :p

:D

I think I'll probably be hittin' the road for much longer than that, see here.

Despite the fact that you're comment in The Fate of the Ring was dripping with amusing sarcasm you deserve a response in this thread, Big Blue. I refuse to be hypocritical in calling all of you apathetic and then ultimately being apathetic myself. So here goes...

Aside from the Valar and Maiar who entered into Eä, are there actually other individual "Ainur" that roam the Halls of Eru outside the realm of time and space? I have always thought of the Ainulindalë as Eru’s creative thought process; and the Music Of The Ainur representing Eru taking a step back and listening to (reflecting on) his own thoughts (i.e. listening to the music).

I would have to agree with this observation based upon the language used in the Ainulindalë by Tolkien:

The Silmarillion: Ainulindalë - The Music of the Ainur

There was Eru, the One, who in Arda is called Ilúvatar; and he made first the Ainur; the Holy Ones, that were the offspring of his thought. ... for each comprehended only that part of the mind of Ilúvatar from which he came...

I especially love the phrase "offspring of his thought"; so they are, in a sense, his Children also; but they are far more derivative from Eru as a source as they almost appear to constitute the consciousness of Eru as a whole. Yet, incredibly, they are still separate conscious beings of their very own. I personally believe that Tolkien may have been one of the greatest philosophers of the Twentieth Century.

When he was satisfied with his ideas/plans regarding his upcoming creative "project" (Eä and Arda), he visualized how the finished product might look (The Vision) in his mind; much like a painter visualizes his finished painting before he begins to paint (though it may look quite different when he is finished with the "actual" painting). Setting things in motion, he then permitted some of his finest brainchildren ;) (creative thoughts) to leave his mind as individual entities (Valar and Maiar) and enter into time and space (Eä) and serve as his creative tools (or paintbrushes) as it were.

This is where I find myself at odds with you in your assertion that once they entered Eä they became their own entities, Big Blue. I would contend, based upon the wording of the Ainulindalë, that they were already separate and individual.

The Silmarillion: Ainulindalë - The Music of the Ainur

But for a long while they sang only each alone ... To Melkor among the Ainur had been given the greatest gifts of power and knowledge ... He had gone often alone into the Void places seeking the Imperishable Flame; for desire grew hot within him to bring into Being things of his own, and it seemed to him that Ilúvatar took no thought for the Void ... Yet he found not the Fire, for it is with Ilúvatar. But being alone he had begun to conceive thoughts of his own unlike those of his brethren.

Now I understand the brilliant concept that I anticipate you will present that Melkor, as a part of Eru's creative process represented the dark side that resides within all Being - that seeks the Void in a spiritual sense, and thus Melkor is indeed simply a constituent of the Being of Eru. However, if this were so, then Melkor would understand entirely that, being part of Being (a little wordplay ;)), the Flame Impersishable resides within Eru - Melkor himself. If Eru in his own existence had constituents that did not comprehend their Source (not their thought process) then Eru would not be infinite as he was in some way bounded by his own thought; thus being against the philosophical maxim of a Creator. Melkor seeking it within the Void was an independent act outside the Thought of Eru (apart from the concept of Fate). It is here where the independent thought of Eru and Melkor is intrinsically separate.

*wipes sweat off forehead* I hope that made some sense. ;)

Do you think the "other" Ainur mentioned who did not enter Eä (time and space) are simply thoughts that remain in the mind of Eru; rather than (literally isolated) individual entities that are roaming around outside of time and space? Other than the mind of Eru, what really is outside of time and space anyway (time and space pretty much covers everything, does it not :p)? And what in fact is "The Void"? Is The Void actually within the mind of Eru, symbolic of a "place" where Eru blots out bad thoughts (Ainur) and stores them in the very back of his mind? :D

I particularly like Alcuin's concept of contrapositive's here in reference to the following quote (however, it is unlikely that it is a complete or even correct econtrapositive).

The Letters of JRR Tolkien - #181: To Michael Straight [drafts]

These [Ainur] take the place of the 'gods', but are created spirits, or those of the primary creation who by their own will have entered the world.

Thus, according to this logic, those who remained did so by their own will. Having separate will would imply that they were also separate Beings. But the premise of a Created Being is independent will anyway.

The quote above goes on to say:

The Letters of JRR Tolkien - #181: To Michael Straight [drafts]

... and were for the Valar an incalculable element [the Children of Ilúvatar]: that is they were rational creatures of free will in regard to God, of the same historical rank as the Valar...

This rank of rational sentience equates Valar (Ainur that descended into Arda and yes, I can see here that you would say that through descending they became independent - but just see above, Big Blue ;)) to creatures of free will - independent with regard to God. I would contend that this contextually conveys Ainur as being free absolutely from their inception.

Melkor's separation from Eru before the creation of Arda and the philosophical implications of him seeking out the Flame Imperishable in the Void is enough to stipulate that the Ainur from the beginning were creatures of free will independent from the Thought of Eru and capable of acting against him.

We could always look at it from a simpler perspective:


The Silmarillion: Ainulindalë - The Music of the Ainur

There was Eru, the One, who in Arda is called Ilúvatar; and he made first the Ainur...

Eru was before the creation of the Ainur; which he made - thus being separate of himself. :D

The Void is a concept I've struggled with for aeons. I would have to, on its basest of levels, conceive that it is simply the absence of Eru - or the Flame Imperishable. A contrived place where Eru chooses not to Be. However, as Arda is created within the Void perhaps a more astute observation would be that it Is where Eru's creation has not yet been realized or fulfilled. A place made separate from Eru (as he is supposedly infinite) where his creation is to take place - a way for him to remain outside of it - which Tolkien oft refers to as being beyond the Confines of the World. This is why Melkor was so highly flawed in his pursuit of the Flame Imperishable within the Void and thus Fell. If you wish, I'll give you copyright to make the literary comparison of Melkor and Fëanor - The Light and the Fall (that's what I would name the thread) based on the quote above from the Ainulindalë about Melkor seeking Light (the Flame Imperishable) and Falling and the beginnings of Fëanor's Fall based on this quote:

The Silmarillion: Of the Silmarils and the Unrest of the Noldor

For Fëanor began to love the Silmarils with a greedy love, and grudged the sight of them to all save his father and his seven sons; he seldom remembered now that they light within them was not his own.

Both sought to be Creators in their own right and consequently Fell. Melkor wishing to bring others into Being with the "Light" of the Flame Imperishable; therefore assuming it as his own and Fëanor forgetting that the Flame Imperishable - housed within the Silmarils (see The Life of the Silmarils thread) was not his own - also assuming it unto himself. Ironic that both were the proto-Fallers, isn't it?

However, back to the discussion at hand, there is also (philosophically as well) the issue of if the Void was the birthplace of Arda (for the specific reason of Creation) then why is there still a Void in existence afterward? As Melkor is thrust into the Void. Perhaps the Void indeed remained to contain the prodigal offspring. I let you get into that one a little deeper on your own, Big Blue. ;)

Adios Amigo,

Úlairi.
 
Originally posted by Úlairi
Despite the fact that you're comment in The Fate of the Ring was dripping with amusing sarcasm

Truth is, I honestly agreed with both of you. Not sure how that is possible, but I couldn’t even trick myself into disagreeing with anything either of you said (and I really tried :D); which is why I chose the middle ground. Truth is, I’m with you as far as the movies are concerned. The book has been under my pillow at night for 28 years, but I thought the movies were freaking great; and the ending worked just fine for me. I never understood the PJ complaints (though Bucky’s "minor" complaints are legitimate, since those are inescapable flaws present in any action film).


I’ll get back to you on the Ainur later (have to begin the day :mad:).
 
The book has been under my pillow at night for 28 years, but I thought the movies were freaking great;

I didn't - not as adaptations, anyway, stand-alone I see them in a bit better light, though even there, Jackson's faible for big, scary monsters is all too blatant... But then, most of the threads in the forum section concerning that issue died so long ago it would be very Sauronian to necromance them ;)
 
Originally posted by Tyelkormo
But then, most of the threads in the forum section concerning that issue died so long ago it would be very Sauronian to necromance them


Indeed. Not where I would like the thread to go anyway - (but I did agree with you’re side as well :p).
 
And what in fact is "The Void"? Is The Void actually within the mind of Eru, symbolic of a "place" where Eru blots out bad thoughts (Ainur) and stores them in the very back of his mind? :D
Interesting question, indeed. I don't seem to recall Tolkien explaining his understanding of the Void anywhere in more detail. IIRC he used Sindarin iâ for 'void' and 'abyss', but that doesn't really explain it.

In Genesis 1 the "formless and void" ('tohuw va bohuw') is - in most cases - explained as a state of "disorder", same as the Greek 'χάος' or the Germanic 'ginungagap', and the first "divine" interaction thus interpreted as bringing some order into the chaos, rather than creating anything out of emptyness or 'nirwana'. Ordering or restructuring some primeval chaos or being is something we find in many creation myths (e.g. Enuma Elish, Kalevala, etc.).

But in T.s Genesis, the One's action is a creative process rather than an ordering one. The Ainur are the "offspring of his thought"(which e.g. somehow resembles the birth of Pallas Athene) and I wonder if T. here purposely deviated from Genesis and thus tried to avoid some of the theological shortcomings of the biblical creation myth...
 
and I wonder if T. here purposely deviated from Genesis and thus tried to avoid some of the theological shortcomings of the biblical creation myth...







That's a rather secular view of the Living God's omnipitence.
 
Originally posted by Walter

In Genesis 1 the "formless and void" ('tohuw va bohuw') is - in most cases - explained as a state of "disorder", same as the Greek 'χάος' or the Germanic 'ginungagap', and the first "divine" interaction thus interpreted as bringing some order into the chaos, rather than creating anything out of emptyness or 'nirwana'.

You are indeed right concerning Genesis and "disorder". Genesis 1;2, the word "was" is translated "Yahah" which is the Hebrew verb meaning "became", and is not "was" as it is used in the English. Thus it should read: "And the earth [became] without form and void [tohu-va bohu]; and darkness was upon the face of the deep" - also verified in Isa. 45:18 - "God Himself That formed the earth and made it; He hath established it He created it not void [tohu], He formed it to be inhabited". The "disorder" in Genesis (Christian view) was due to the"katabole",a Greek word translated "disruption", or "ruin" (2 Peter 3:6; "Whereby the world [ὁ αἰών (aion) = age] that then was perished:", and "kataballo" in Rev. 12:10, "overthrow", referring to the rebellion of the Dragon and his cronies in a previous age long ago. Tolkien participated in the translation of the Jerusalem Bible, so it's possible he was aware of this (though he primarily focused on Jonah and Job).

Originally posted by Walter
The Ainur are the "offspring of his thought"(which e.g. somehow resembles the birth of Pallas Athene)

Interesting thought. However, Tolkien's Metis must have had multiple Ainu embryos implanted - the "Octo-Metis" :D.

Originally posted by Walter
and I wonder if T. here purposely deviated from Genesis and thus tried to avoid some of the theological shortcomings of the biblical creation myth...

I’m not sure if Tolkien himself believed there were shortcomings in the Biblical account of creation. I would tend to think he was simply creating his own unique mythology (of course borrowing a little here and there ;)).
 
Last edited:
You are indeed right concerning Genesis and "disorder". Genesis 1;2, the word "was" is translated "Yahah" which is the Hebrew verb meaning "became", and is not "was" as it is used in the English. Thus it should read: "And the earth [became] without form and void [tohu-va bohu]; and darkness was upon the face of the deep" - also verified in Isa. 45:18 - "God Himself That formed the earth and made it; He hath established it He created it not void [tohu], He formed it to be inhabited". The "disorder" in Genesis (Christian view) was due to the"katabole",a Greek word translated "disruption", or "ruin" (2 Peter 3:6; "Whereby the world [ὁ αἰών (aion) = age] that then was perished:", and "kataballo" in Rev. 12:10, "overthrow", referring to the rebellion of the Dragon and his cronies in a previous age long ago. Tolkien participated in the translation of the Jerusalem Bible, so it's possible he was aware of this (though he primarily focused on Jonah and Job).
Thanks for drawing my attention to this. As I have not poked my nose into such books for a few years by now, I all but forgot about the ample possibilities to translate/interpret the first chapters of Genesis. Be it the possibility to regard 'elohiym' as plural, which may be yet another hint at the fact that a strict monotheism was introduced only much later to the Hebrew community inhabiting the Canaan/Palestine area. Or the ambiguity of 'ruwach' - the greek 'πνεύμα' - which may be translated/interpreted as "spirit", "breath" or "wind" (and of which Barfield IIRC maintains that it once meant neither of these, but rather had its own peculiar meaning which during the evolution of language has been divided into these separate meanings).

However, the first chapters of the Hebrew Bible bear more resemblance (than any other part of the works) to other (historical or creational) myths, e.g. the Greek and Babylonian ones. Especially the latter should be no surprise given the Babylonian roots of the Semitic tribes later inhabiting Canaan. Thus I do not consider the cross-connection to Isaiah - a much later part of the OT - as proof - or even indication - that in Genesis 1 the God(s) have "created" the world out of nothingness. IMO in Genesis 1 we encounter rather a process of ordering - or dividing into opposites - than creating.

Interesting thought. However, Tolkien's Metis must have had multiple Ainu embryos implanted - the "Octo-Metis" :D.
Hehe, I often wondered why T. chose this wording, eventually. I liked better how Ilúvatar had sung them into being in the earlier versions...

I’m not sure if Tolkien himself believed there were shortcomings in the Biblical account of creation. I would tend to think he was simply creating his own unique mythology (of course borrowing a little here and there ;)).
Of course I cannot be sure about that either. But given his philological expertise and how diligently he approached the part of the Jerusalem bible he translated, I would presume he must have been aware of the many possibilities to translate/interprete Genesis. That and considering the effort he has put into combining the pagan gods of Germanic/Northern mythology with a monotheistic approach of an "All-father" in his 'Music of the Ainur', leads me to think that in his later years he might not have been very happy with the Biblical Creation Myths...

Feel free to consider this as pure speculation on my part... :)
 
Last edited:
The other Ainur who did not enter Ea were proper beings. They were the offsprings of the thought of Illuvitar. They were like the Valar and Maiar. But the only difference they were not bound to the fate of Arda. Secondly, all the individual entities created by Eru are under his control as he is the Supreme One.
The Void was an area beyond Arda and the world, which may have been the equivalent to space or the universe. The only difference is it was timeless, but there was space obviously. Secondly, according to the Ainulindalë, Ilúvatar, the All-father, dwelt in the Timeless Halls that are separate from the Void.

I am Ingolmin, descendant of Elrond Halfelven and a young loremaster who enlightens the world with my divine knowledge.
 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top