- Joined
- Jun 28, 2022
- Messages
- 4,998
I have a book in my library I've not read yet. it's touted to be a good one.I wonder what result an EEG would produc
I think it's title is fitting here.
"Flatland".

I have a book in my library I've not read yet. it's touted to be a good one.I wonder what result an EEG would produc
If we're talking about the movie EYE, I'd be more interested in what brand of eye drops was he using.
This answer got 141 upvotes 😖The Necromancer in The Hobbit is an enigmatic figure who is never fully identified.
Some believe that he may be Sauron, the Dark Lord of Mordor, while others think that he may be another character entirely.
What is known for certain is that he has powerful magical abilities and can summon dark spirits to do his bidding.
He poses a serious threat to the people of Middle-earth and must be stopped at all costs.
Yep. Smart-sounding answers on Quora get upvotes regardless of how dumb they really are.Had to update the title of this thread because it's not always the questions that are off.
Question: Who is the Necromancer in The Hobbit?
Answer:
This answer got 141 upvotes 😖
The random, chaotic firing of synapses.Wikipedia:
"Electroencephalography (EEG) is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain."
I wonder what result an EEG would produce if those asking a lot of these questions (not all of them) were to examined while posting the questions. 🤔
Actually, if one takes JRRT's pose as translator of The Red Book of Westmarch seriously (ahem ... 😬), the question is quite reasonable.View attachment 24080
This was the fox that passed by Frodo and Sam and Pippin their first night in the Green Hill country, and (talking to itself) thought three hobbits sleeping out of doors was odd.
I don't follow you.... well sort of.... maybe... but the question (as I saw it) was hinged on "the Hobbits" i.e., These Three Particular Hobbits.Actually, if one takes JRRT's pose as translator of The Red Book of Westmarch seriously (ahem ... 😬), the question is quite reasonable.
Story-external I'd guess this authorial intrusion is a residue of The Hobbit, for which JRRT at this point was still struggling to write a sequel.
I agree and I think I can see why Tolkien left it in. Thematically, it marks the end of the "kid stuff" and the beginning of something serious.Actually, if one takes JRRT's pose as translator of The Red Book of Westmarch seriously (ahem ... 😬), the question is quite reasonable.
Story-external I'd guess this authorial intrusion is a residue of The Hobbit, for which JRRT at this point was still struggling to write a sequel.
What about adding: 'And there was wailing and gnashing of teeth, and dust and ashes where cast upon heads'And it came about when Deimos read these words, that he tore his garments and shaved his head, and went about despondently.
And he put on sackcloth and fasted, and he lay many days and nights in sackcloth.
I was saving that one for the next "Bonkers" post 😄What about adding: 'And there was wailing and gnashing of teeth, and dust and ashes was cast upon heads'
We'll see who manages to get there first.I was saving that one for the next "Bonkers" post 😄