My take on these essays (warning
: some thread repetition
: but I'm bored so here goes).
As
Glorfindel (when slain) was under the ban (and with the ban still in effect), he was not allowed to return in
bodily form to
Aman, but his mitigation includes:
1) he incurred the ban reluctantly because of kinship and allegiance to
Turgon
2) he took no part in the Kinslaying
3) he sacrificed his life
- which was, as already noted, of vital importance to the designs of the
Valar
After his purging of any guilt incurred in the Rebellion,
Manwe restored him. Glorfindel thus regained the primitive innocence and grace of the Eldar, and with his spiritual power being greatly enhanced by his self-sacrifice, he became almost an equal of the
Maiar.
Glorfindel returns to
Middle-earth in the
Second Age - before Aman is removed from the Circles of the World.
With respect to Glorfindel returning in
the Third Age (
after the removal of Aman, as in
Glorfindel I), even though, as
Tolkien ponders, Manwe could be supposed to have received the permission of
Eru to make an exception in Glorfindel's case, JRRT yet considers this idea:
"improbable and would make Glorfindel of greater power and importance than seems fitting"
In
Morgoth's Ring Tolkien had written the following about restored
Elves:
A) "Normally they must nonetheless remain in Aman. Therefore, if they dwelt in Middle-earth, their bereavement of friends and kin, and the bereavement of these, was not amended." B) "The re-housed fea will normally remain in Aman. Only in very exceptional cases, such as Beren and Luthien, will they be transported back to Middle-earth. . . hence death in Middle-earth had much the same sort of sorrow and sunderance for Elves and Men." C) "normally remained in Aman" because being once again in physical bodies "return to Middle-earth was therefore very difficult and perilous."
But in the later text G
lorfindel I, JRRT very generally and simply states that a re-embodied
Elf could remain in Aman, "
or return to Middle-earth if their home had been there". . .
. . . and with respect to Glorfindel specifically, he is said to have remained 'cause
Gondolin was destroyed and all or most of his kin had perished. In
Glorfindel II Tolkien basically says the same thing, and adds that the Elf's long sojourn in Aman was also in accord with the wishes and designs of Manwe.
Thus, as I read the runes so far (if the very general statement concerning restored Elves returning to Middle-earth from
Glorfindel I holds for
Glorfindel II - it isn't repeated in text II, in any event),
in the context of both late essays at least,
Laurefindele's return to Middle-earth does not seem to be that exceptional as far as someone being
allowed to return Over Sea; yet Glorfindel was allowed to be restored, in the body, in Aman, while the ban on the Exiles was still in place.
it's also interesting the reason why Tolkien decided that the Glorfindel in LOTR was the same Glorfindel that died in the
first age.
Tolkien was very careful with works already published. Glorfindel was a unique name and the customs among the Eldar were to not repeat names of important elves, in that sense it was highly unlikely that 2 different elves named Glorfindel would exist.
I don't get the sense that JRRT is referring to any in-story custom of the Elves here. I rather think he's just noting something that he thinks would not be credible to his readers [having two arguably important Elves with the same "striking name" (as he called it)].
JRRT notes that this is "possible" but not credible,
but for myself (as of today, and not that it matters given JRRT's decision), I don't think I'd find such a scenario that
incredible, or even that
outcredible, especially due to the fact that Elven Mothers could have prophetic foresight in the matter of naming their children
- that is, why not name your son after an important Elf, if you know, by foresight, that he (your son) will also be a great deed doer.
And if you know he will be golden haired too.
Cough.
Well, admittedly
that isn't the only concern here, but just to mention another aspect of the name:
Glorfindel can be considered somewhat "archaic" in form, Sindarin-wise, but again I see no great problem with using this form as a name.
In any case the name wasn't the only reason (not that anyone said otherwise), as Tolkien noted that the acceptance of "one" Glorfindel:
"will actually explain what is said of him and improve the story."
🐾