Folks are
so exagerating when it comes to
Glorfindel in
Middle-earth...
They are like an autistic child 'persevertating' (obsessively focusing) on two things:
Durin's Band
Glorfindel
Before you go PC on me, I HAVE an autistic child....
I'm simply making a point about how out of skew things are: two minor characters people go wild making these in-depth studies on when
Tolkien himself wasn't positive on a lot of things....
The fact is in 'Many meetings',
Elrond is described 'hale as a warrior in the fulness of his strength' ~ wasn't HE
the one that was in final battle on Mount Doom when
Sauron was thrown down the first time?
Where was Glorfindel? This suggests that Tolkien hadn't even settled that Glorf was back at the time he wrote TLOR & decided later, like when he wrote the Appendices & included Glorfindel in the battle where the
Witch-king was defeated that Glorfindel was in Middle-earth in the
Second Age!
Otherwise, such a mighty
Elf warrior would've been beside
Cirdan, Isidur,
Elendil, Elrond, &
Gil-Galad right? Orr would he be?
Where's
Celeborn, who rules an entire kingdom? :*eek:
Here we have Glorfindel, a mere 'warrior'...
I don't think, either, that it's so clear-cut that he's 'more powerful' than Elrond.
Let's see: Glorfindel can't protect
Frodo from
the Nine; he simply sends Frodo fleeing on a
horse...
One step into Elriond's territory & the Nine get washed away in a flood.
Humm...
But, you say, Glorfindel's a High Elf, seen the Light of the
Trees..
True, but Elrond comes from the blood of all three royal families that went to
Valinor, which is always presented as being far more noble & powerful. He also has Maian blood from
Melian & he carries the most powerful of the Three Elven Rings.
Elrond is no question the more powerful.