I don't feel that this really applies in Arwen's case. It was a standard applied to men. In fact in many cases strong willed, warrior type women were not really appreciated in mediaeval times, (with a few exceptions suchas Eleanor of Aquitaine). Femininity was deemed to be the most desirable aspect, I mean, even intelligent women were scorned , at least publicly, right up to comparatively recent times, why else did female writers have to use male pen names in order to get published?I don't think character should be measured on heroic warrior like fighting, but in a midievil - like setting, character WAS. Faramir was looked down upon for a lonnnng time simply because he was mroe peace loving than his brother.
She was delicate and feminine and not a fighter.
Also, if you think about it, it was a bit like sewing her wedding dress in front of her father. It says it was wrought in secret, doesn't it? Or perhaps I'm mixing it up with something else. . .I wonder if her father knew what she was sewing.
In fact in many cases strong willed, warrior type women were not really appreciated in mediaeval times
Why should she have to show herself equal to Aragorn physically in order to be considered worthy of him?
I certainly don't feel that as a stay at home wife and mother I am less worthy than my husband who goes off to work each day.
Feminism grates on my nerves, for one thing, even when it has a point.
Submissive used to be considered a virtue, and probably still should be.
Letter #154
But in this story it is supposed that there may be certain rare exceptions or accommodations (legitimately supposed? there always seem to be exceptions); and so certain 'mortals', who have played some great part in Elvish affairs, may pass with the Elves to Elvenhome. Thus Frodo ([color=sky blue]by the express gift of Arwen[/color]*) and Bilbo, and eventually Sam (as adumbrated by Frodo); and as a unique exception Gimli the Dwarf, as friend of Legolas and 'servant' of Galadriel.
*It is not made explicit how she could arrange this. She could not of course just transfer her ticket on the boat like that! For any except those of Elvish race 'sailing West' was not permitted, and any exception required 'authority', and she was not in direct communication with the Valar, especially not since her choice to become 'mortal'. What is meant is that it was Arwen who first thought of sending Frodo into the West, and put in a plea for him to Gandalf (direct or through Galadriel, or both), and she used her own renunciation of the right to go West as an argument. Her renunciation and suffering were related to and enmeshed with Frodo's : both were parts of a plan for the regeneration of the state of Men. Her prayer might therefore be specially effective, and her plan have a certain equity of exchange. No doubt it was Gandalf who was the authority that accepted her plea. The Appendices show clearly that he was an emissary of the Valar, and virtually their plenipotentiary in accomplishing the plan against Sauron. He was also in special accord with Cirdan the Ship-master, who had surrendered to him his ring and so placed himself under Gandalf's command. Since Gandalf himself went on the Ship there would be so to speak no trouble either at embarking or at the landing.
Letter #246
That appears to have been the judgement of Gandalf and Aragorn and of all who learned the full story of his journey. Certainly nothing would be concealed by Frodo! But what Frodo himself felt about the events is quite another matter.
He appears at first to have had no sense of guilt (III 224-5);1 he was restored to sanity and peace. But then he thought that he had given his life in sacrifice: he expected to die very soon. But he did not, and one can observe the disquiet growing in him. [color=sky blue]Arwen was the first to observe the signs, and gave him her jewel for comfort, and thought of a way of healing him.[/color] Slowly he fades 'out of the picture', saying and doing less and less. I think it is clear on reflection to an attentive reader that when his dark times came upon him and he was conscious of being 'wounded by knife sting and tooth and a long burden' (III 268) it was not only nightmare memories of past horrors that afflicted him, but also unreasoning self-reproach: he saw himself and all that he done as a broken failure. 'Though I may come to the Shire, it will not seem the same, for I shall not be the same.' That was actually a temptation out of the Dark, a last flicker of pride: desire to have returned as a 'hero', not content with being a mere instrument of good. And it was mixed with another temptation, blacker and yet (in a sense) more merited, for however that may be explained, he had not in fact cast away the Ring by a voluntary act: he was tempted to regret its destruction, and still to desire it. 'It is gone for ever, and now all is dark and empty', he said as he wakened from his sickness in 1420.
'Alas! there are some wounds that cannot be wholly cured', said Gandalf (III 268) – not in Middle-earth. Frodo was sent or allowed to pass over Sea to heal him – if that could be done, before he died. He would have eventually to 'pass away': no mortal could, or can, abide for ever on earth, or within Time. So he went both to a purgatory and to a reward, for a while: a period of reflection and peace and a gaining of a truer understanding of his position in littleness and in greatness, spent still in Time amid the natural beauty of 'Arda Unmarred', the Earth unspoiled by evil.
Bilbo went too. No doubt as a completion of the plan due to Gandalf himself. Gandalf had a very great affection for Bilbo, from the hobbit's childhood onwards. His companionship was really necessary for Frodo's sake – it is difficult to imagine a hobbit, even one who had been through Frodo's experiences, being really happy even in an earthly paradise without a companion of his own kind, and Bilbo was the person that Frodo most loved. (Cf III 252 lines 12 to 21 and 263 lines 1-2.)2 But he also needed and deserved the favour on his own account. He bore still the mark of the Ring that needed to be finally erased : a trace of pride and personal possessiveness. Of course he was old and confused in mind, but it was still a revelation of the 'black mark' when he said in Rivendell (III 265) 'What's become of my ring, Frodo, that you took away?'; and when he was reminded of what had happened, his immediate reply was: 'What a pity! I should have liked to see it again'. As for reward for his pan, it is difficult to feel that his life would be complete without an experience of 'pure Elvishness', and the opportunity of hearing the legends and histories in full the fragments of which had so delighted him.
[color=sky blue]It is clear, of course, that the plan had actually been made and concerted (by Arwen, Gandalf and others) before Arwen spoke.[/color] But Frodo did not immediately take it in;
I remain and will always remain annoyed by Arwen as a literary character because she is plain and simple dull. Kind of like Jane from Pride and Prejudice.
We know that she is sweet, lets people push her around, and...that's it.
But what does she DO ? What does she think, what emotions does she ever express, besides a few expressionless sentences here and there ?
Sadly, it is an ideal, a lovely, middle class, suburban ideal that a large majority of men and women can never live up to due to economy, unfaithful relationships, and poverty.
Dependance and submissiveness are lovely in ideals, in reality however, they are far less lovely. Sorry for my off topic-ness.
Really those just increase my feeling that Arwen is basically a plot convenience...
“So many have said,” she answered gravely. “Yet her name is not mine. Though maybe my doom will be not unlike hers.”
The only true feminists are those who don't talk about it or attack men, but just lead their lives the way their morals, talents, wishes, etc tell them to and do what they need to do.
(and dependence to a father I definitely would until a girl is of age).
If what you're saying about feminism is true, however, none of the people thought of as feminists are feminists
I think it has become a tainted word that won't escape its taint, and that you need to find a new word.
I think a lot of women are led to believe they have to work due to this argument when it really isn't true
Letter #43; Letters of TolkienWomen really have not much part in all this, though they may use the language of romantic love, since it is so entwined in all our idioms. The sexual impulse makes women (naturally when unspoiled more unselfish) very sympathetic and understanding, or specially desirous of being so (or seeming so), and very ready to enter into all the interests, as far as they can, from ties to religion, of the young man they are attracted to. No intent necessarily to deceive: sheer instinct: the servient, helpmeet instinct, generously warmed by desire and young blood. Under this impulse they can in fact often achieve very remarkable insight and understanding, even of things otherwise outside their natural range: for it is their gift to be receptive, stimulated, fertilized (in many other matters than the physical) by the male. Every teacher knows that. How quickly an intelligent woman can be taught, grasp his ideas, see his point – and how (with rare exceptions) they can go no further, when they leave his hand, or when they cease to take a personal interest in him. But this is their natural avenue to love. Before the young woman knows where she is (and while the romantic young man, when he exists, is still sighing) she may actually 'fall in love'. Which for her, an unspoiled natural young woman, means that she wants to become the mother of the young man's children, even if that desire is by no means clear to her or explicit. And then things are going to happen: and they may be very painful and harmful, if things go wrong. Particularly if the young man only wanted a temporary guiding star and divinity (until he hitches his waggon to a brighter one), and was merely enjoying the flattery of sympathy nicely seasoned with a titillation of sex – all quite innocent, of course, and worlds away from 'seduction'
You may meet in life (as in literature) women who are flighty, or even plain wanton — I don't refer to mere flirtatiousness, the sparring practice for the real combat, but to women who are too silly to take even love seriously, or are actually so depraved as to enjoy 'conquests', or even enjoy the giving of pain – but these are abnormalities, even though false teaching, bad upbringing, and corrupt fashions may encourage them. Much though modern conditions have changed feminine circumstances, and the detail of what is considered propriety, they have not changed natural instinct. A man has a life-work, a career, (and male friends), all of which could (and do where he has any guts) survive the shipwreck of 'love'. A young woman, even one 'economically independent', as they say now (it usually really means economic subservience to male commercial employers instead of to a father or a family), begins to think of the 'bottom drawer' and dream of a home, almost at once. If she really falls in love, the shipwreck may really end on the rocks. Anyway women are in general much less romantic and more practical. Don't be misled by the fact that they are more 'sentimental' in words – freer with 'darling', and all that. They do not want a guiding star. They may idealize a plain young man into a hero; but they don't really need any such glamour either to fall in love or to remain in it. If they have any delusion it is that they can 'reform' men.
Letter #244; Letters of TolkienEowyn: It is possible to love more than one person (of the other sex) at the same time, but in a different mode and intensity. I do not think that Éowyn’s feelings for Aragorn really changed much; and when he was revealed as so lofty a figure, in descent and office, she was able to go on loving and admiring him. He was old, and that is not only a physical quality: when not accompanied by any physical decay age can be alarming or awe-inspiring. Also she was not herself ambitious in the true political sense. Though not a 'dry nurse' in temper, she was also not really a soldier or 'amazon', but like many brave women was capable of great military gallantry at a crisis.
think a lot of women are led to believe they have to work due to this argument when it really isn't true
If what you're saying about feminism is true, however, none of the people thought of as feminists are feminists. The only true feminists are those who don't talk about it or attack men, but just lead their lives the way their morals, talents, wishes, etc tell them to and do what they need to do. However, these aren't what we see as far as feminism goes. I think it has become a tainted word that won't escape its taint, and that you need to find a new word.
Same author. Different character and book: Elenor, Sense and Sensibility (admits to only having watched the movie but I've also watched the entire eight tape Pride and Prejudice).
What if a girl is in a position where she has no father?
Really? You're stereotyping for no good reason. Some of the women who march, who shout anti-Male rhetoric are feminists in their own way, and just because they care to voice their disgust with Men doesn't mean they reject the positive (In my eyes) ideals that feminism promotes.
A lot of Women work because they want to not because of some subliminal government messages.
To me this indiactes an ignorance of the world.
I doubt you could tell a woman who has been left alone with five young children to raise that the job of provider belongs to the man.
Just look at the number of one parent famalies WORLDWIDE.
Masculinity and femininity are social creations.
Elenor was also less interesting in the book. She had to be interesting in the movie because she was played by Emma Thompson.
This is the kind of thinking that comes about when people spend too much time in the university and/or watching too much TV, and not enough time in the real world.Masculinity and femininity are social creations.
Not half as ridiculous as the Eowyn-bashing I'm forced to endure, thank-you. Funny how they shut up when I respond, though- and in such arguments I'm generally the only one backing myself up with the text.
all people deserve to have the right to decide what they want to do with their own life and not be told by anyone else what their "place " is.
Not half as ridiculous as the Eowyn-bashing I'm forced to endure, thank-you.
Arwen's passivity annoys me, and this is tied to my ideas about feminism, but I feel talking about that would pull this thread even more off-topic than it is already, because it goes in to gender roles and all of that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?