Which is a main reason why I never read 'Letters' or much of HoME. The author's works are what deserves the attention, not what the author wrote to others about them.The last word I'll leave to John Ronald, from the Letters: "I object to the contemporary trend in criticism, with its excessive interest in the details of the lives of authors and artists. they only detract attention from an author's works, and end, as one now often sees, in becoming the main interest. But only one's Guardian Angel, or indeed God Himself, could unravel the real relationship between personal facts and an author's works. Not the author himself (though he knows more than any investigator), and certainly not so-called 'psychologists'."
dancing in a grove of flowering hemlock trees
It's almost a point-for-point rewrite of the Finnish myth of Kullervo of which Tolkien also wrote his own version.Personally I think the Children of Hurin was closer to the norse mythologies than any other of Tolkien's works. It seems to have the dark and bleak aspect that many of the Norse legends have with betrayal, trickery and death in abundence. If not for the less explored story of Fram and Scatha I might say that the tale of Hurin's childern was closest to Beowulf, in fact it may even still be the case.
I had heard about this a few times, and that was also the reason why I bought the 2014 German Kalevala retelling by Tilman Spreckelsen. (Unfortunately I don't know Finnish, but I guess that's a problem of quite a few people). Although I found the many stories and myths in it quite interesting, especially with regard to Tolkien, the chapter on Kullervo of all things was completely disappointing, although Spreckelsen certainly gives the impression of being a Tolkien connoisseur. So either this was miserably retold by Spreckelsen, or Tolkien has created something truly majestic from a rather banal original. In that case, 98% of the credit would go to Tolkien, and there is no question of "copying", as some critics accuse him of doing.It's almost a point-for-point rewrite of the Finnish myth of Kullervo
Fingon_Findekano said:There was at least one particular detail I noticed distinctly different between the two that is not often addressed, and that was in regards to the aftermath upon the hill of Amon Rûdh after the Orcs had attacked and captured Túrin. In the SIL, it says that Mîm found Beleg lying wounded upon the hilltop, and was about to kill him when then Beleg stood up and took his sword back from Mîm and sent him running away in fear. In CoH, Beleg had been wounded and captured, then left tied to the ground as per Mîm’s request so he could kill him, but before he could, Andróg, who had been mortally wounded, came up behind Mîm and scared him off. Then he freed Beleg with his last strength.
Thanks! I didn't realize it had been over sixteen years since I last posted here!Nothing to add, except welcome back, Aiwendil2! 🙂
My, how time flies. 🤣over sixteen years since I last posted here!
You know, I don't think it's just you...it kind of happened to me as well, also very recently returning.Thanks! I didn't realize it had been over sixteen years since I last posted here!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Are you happy to accept cookies and these technologies?