Persephone
Formerly known as Narya
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2002
- Messages
- 1,383
There can be no freedom without sacrifice.

Tolkien tried really hard to present Middle-Earth as a part of our world:Varokhâr said:Then again, an omnipotent deity like Eru could've made it so that sacrifice is unecessary for anything. But he was just a literary tool, not a watertight theology, so any sort of flaws we may pick out really don't matter, as Eru served his purpose in the story well.
1971 BBC Interview said:Dennis Gerrolt: I thought that conceivably Midgard might be Middle-earth or have some connection?
J.R.R.T.: Oh yes, they're the same word. Most people have made this mistake of thinking Middle-earth is a particular kind of Earth or is another planet of the science fiction sort but it's just an old fashioned word for this world we live in, as imagined surrounded by the Ocean.
Letter #151 said:Middle-earth is just archaic English for [?], the inhabited world of men
His remarks in Myths Transformed about good sprouting out of evil closely parallel his views about the real world (letter #64). Also, Tolkien reffers to Eru as God several times in the letters; I doubt he, a convinced christian, could have conceived a God who would be alien to christianity - seeing that LotR is a catholic work (cf. letter #142).Letter #165 said:'Middle-earth', by the way, is not a name of a never-never land without relation to the world we live in (like the Mercury of Eddison). It is just a use of Middle English middel-erde (or erthe), altered from Old English Middangeard: the name for the inhabited lands of Men 'between the seas'. And though I have not attempted to relate the shape of the mountains and land-masses to what geologists may say or surmise about the nearer past, imaginatively this 'history' is supposed to take place in a period of the actual Old World of this planet.
Thorondor_ said:
Varokhâr said:Very true; I know I would've done the same in his shoes. His Middle-earth reflects how he saw our Middle-earth in many ways, including religiously, at least inasmuch as some of his ideas behind the character of Eru are concerned. Eru always seemed to be based very much on the Abrahamic god, to me.
I'm just trying to avoid bringing up real-world religion, since I understand it's mostly a forbidden subject here![]()
Walter said:Did he ask to be worshipped?
There is no regulation restricting discussions on religion as long as it is related to Tolkien's work; our mods can confirm that.I would suggest that none of you continue with this line of thought since we are not supposed to discuss religion in this forum
Narya said:
Shireman D said:Eh?
Both are creative
Both permit free will
Both use emissaries
Both have a chosen people
Both cause earth-changing floods
Both have mountain fanes
Both have ... oh why am I doing this ?!
Shireman D said:p.s. please read the line at the bottom of this post very carefully and note that it is about horticulture rather than theology: these is an important statement there! Mind you I am sometimes think that the boundary between the two is pretty whispy.
morgoththe1 said:Hmmmm, really. When dealing on such topics though, it IS hard to distuinguish one from the other. Oh well. Sorry.
This is indeed a very good point Walter, and one that I also have thought on.Walter said:Did he ask to be worshipped?
Eru wanted his children to grow and increase in knowledge and wisdon in and of themselves. The only ones in all Arda, or anywhere else for that matter, who craved worship were Melkor and after him, Sauron.'First seek tofind the answer for yourselves. For ye will have joy in the finding, and so grow from childhood and become wise. Do not seek to leave childhood before your time.'
Gothmog said:
Ancalagon said:When one considers the devastation upon Arda since the beginning, one must wonder whether Eru indeed deserved to be praised. Man seems the only sentient being upon Arda to have ever really praised Eru, yet should all races bow down before him/her and be thankful, such as the Evil races do before Melkor or Sauron. In saying that, they are but Demigods, neither of whom really deserve worship.
Is Ilúvatar worthy of worship or is the question itself irrelevant?
Yet the Atrabeth also states:Yet rather than display his power and knowledge, his answer to these questions was simple yet profound.
So love of anything else than Eru is a bringer of grief, sadness.
This atests the following: that the memory of Eru was preserved, that there did exist priest-kings, with spiritual ascendence, and that the worshipping of Eru will be renewed.Letter #156 said:So ended Numenor-Atlantis and all its glory. But in a kind of Noachian situation the small party of the Faithful in Numenor escaped in Nine Ships under the leadership of Elendil – inheriting the hatred of Sauron, the friendship of the Elves, the knowledge of the True God, and (less happily) the yearning for longevity, and the habit of embalming and the building of splendid tombs – their only 'hallows': or almost so. But the 'hallow' of God and the Mountain had perished, and there was no real substitute. Also when the 'Kings' came to an end there was no equivalent to a 'priesthood': the two being identical in Numenorean ideas. So while God (Eru) was a datum of good Numenorean philosophy, and a prime fact in their conception of history. He had at the time of the War of the Ring no worship and no hallowed place. And that kind of negative truth was characteristic of the West, and all the area under Numenorean influence: the refusal to worship any 'creature', and above all no 'dark lord' or satanic demon, Sauron, or any other, was almost as far as they got. They had (I imagine) no petitionary prayers to God ; but preserved the vestige of thanksgiving. (Those under special Elvish influence might call on the angelic powers for help in immediate peril or fear of evil enemies.)... It is to be presumed that with the reemergence of the lineal priest kings (of whom Luthien the Blessed Elf-maiden was a foremother) the worship of God would be renewed, and His Name (or title) be again more often heard. But there would be no temple of the True God while Numenorean influence lasted.
Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty.