- Joined
- Jun 28, 2022
- Messages
- 5,025
This issue of 'hope' is huge.
Why do various 'religions' and 'spiritualities' exist to begin with?
And why does Tolkien say all good fantasy/mythology MUST contain the elements of morality and religion?
And what is the human, without some kind of measuring stick to strive toward, except a self-serving, grasping, "gimme gimme gimme' individual?
What is the human without some hope of the future? The one for whom the grave is the end of all things?
What a desperate plight.
The difference between a history book, and a story, is the history book needs no 'hope.' It simply writes what is.
Those involved in a war do not necessarily see the war as it is... or the future as 'without hope.' Else, why would they fight? (Unless they're just automatons - sheeple convinced they must do as their leader says, and their fear of the leader is greater than their fear of death in the war.)
No, no... there must be hope.
I would go on with the difference between the 'normal' human and the truly 'criminal' human... but will refrain at this point.
However it's handled, however contained, however frequently alluded to... whether as a part of an individual circumstance or situation, or the broader picture of a work, 'hope' must be incorporated. Even if its target is far, far distant in time, or in presence, within the scene.
There is more Tolkien also referred to, to continually keep in mind - it surrounds his comment that death and the fear of death must be present in Story. This plays hugely, in all his works, and should be kept in mind as well.
Why do various 'religions' and 'spiritualities' exist to begin with?
And why does Tolkien say all good fantasy/mythology MUST contain the elements of morality and religion?
And what is the human, without some kind of measuring stick to strive toward, except a self-serving, grasping, "gimme gimme gimme' individual?
What is the human without some hope of the future? The one for whom the grave is the end of all things?
What a desperate plight.
The difference between a history book, and a story, is the history book needs no 'hope.' It simply writes what is.
Those involved in a war do not necessarily see the war as it is... or the future as 'without hope.' Else, why would they fight? (Unless they're just automatons - sheeple convinced they must do as their leader says, and their fear of the leader is greater than their fear of death in the war.)
No, no... there must be hope.
I would go on with the difference between the 'normal' human and the truly 'criminal' human... but will refrain at this point.
However it's handled, however contained, however frequently alluded to... whether as a part of an individual circumstance or situation, or the broader picture of a work, 'hope' must be incorporated. Even if its target is far, far distant in time, or in presence, within the scene.
There is more Tolkien also referred to, to continually keep in mind - it surrounds his comment that death and the fear of death must be present in Story. This plays hugely, in all his works, and should be kept in mind as well.

