
I wonder.... a warrior typically wielded a sword/spear/mace in his dominant hand (almost always the right) and a shield with his left hand and/or supported on his left forearm. Any rings may have presented more of a problem while holding a shield rather than a sword.Quite frankly, I have been considering this very issue in my somewhat extensive musings on the possibilities.
Which hand did Gandalf wield Glamdring with? The right? Then maybe unlikely he wore a ring on the right. And yet... he was not a constant wielder of the sword, though he wore and brandished it often to good effect, and just pulling it out seemed to make some Orcs die in droves....(kidding).
So I've added research of which hand Gandalf may have used for what, to my research list on the matter.
Unlikely the knowing will change my predilection...but it's the knowing I seek. The knowing. (Color me an obsessed Ent, whatever color obsessed looks like.)
No stone left unturned, as some say.
I've had the thought about a possible conflict between "weapons hands" and "ring hands" cropping up all the time while reading the posts in this thread ...Quite frankly, I have been considering this very issue in my somewhat extensive musings on the possibilities.As to rings, I'm quite certain that both tennis players and baseball batters never wore any on any hand having contact with their hitting equipment. 😬
True. But Gandalf is in my gunsights, not other warriors.Any rings may have presented more of a problem while holding a shield rather than a sword.
Important contributionns, thank you.Anyway. There's these.
That depends on the type of shield, if it had 2 straps that the user put his arm through, then a ring wouldn't get in the way.Any rings may have presented more of a problem while holding a shield rather than a sword.
all the shields I've seen with two straps, one is held in the hand-palm, with the other going over the forearm near the elbow.if it had 2 straps that the user put his arm through, then a ring wouldn't get in the way.
Fortunately, bowling balls come 'uni-hand'. No holes at all.Also bowling balls.
That is correct, but remember that a lot of warriors would have gone into battle wearing gloves.all the shields I've seen with two straps, one is held in the hand-palm, with the other going over the forearm near the elbow.
would seem the strap in the hand-palm would have SOME kind of impact given a ring...
sword or shield strap... what I see is blisters.
(maybe there's a type of shield I'm not familiar with.)
Another good point. I suspect, for several reasons, many real 'warriors' would have gone into battle 'unadorned'.a lot of warriors would have gone into battle wearing gloves
I like the idea of:
just entered a new column in my research tracking spreadsheet:scrunchies
Hum.Those who use rings as weapons wear them on the right hand. (The bad guys.)
Those who use rings for good purposes wear them on the left hand. (The good guys.)
good eyes and point...Edit: The more I look at the image the more it looks like the left arm and hand. So, this would be consistent with the right hand with the missing finger being back out of view.
Only Gandalf?True. But Gandalf is in my gunsights, not other warriors.
Gandalf is either staff in right, sword in left, or sword in right, staff in left.
The ring would present less difficulty for the staff.
But perhaps... just perhaps... he didn't wear it at all when he went into actual battle. (Though I'd hate to think he put it in the pocket inside his cloak.)
Ummmm.... well, yes, ......except....except,.... EXCEPT Bandobras Took didn't use no "uni-hand" club when he took the head off Golfimbul the Goblin King!!!....
Golf clubs have evolved. Many of these are mass-produced and 'unihand' in the shaft too...