• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Why didn't 🧙Gandalf make a Ring?

Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
267
I don't mean a Ring to control people like Sauron made (and which may have been the sort that Saruman had made as well), but one more like the Elven Rings, only this time not tied to the One Ring. Gandalf wouldn't have wanted a controlling Ring anyway, but a sort of protection Ring like Galadriel had and was using to protect Lothlorien or that Elrond had to protect Rivendale, and yes, even like the one of the Three that had come into his possession. If he that Ring plus own Gandalf Ring, he could have, perhaps, done something like withstood Saurman at Isengard or even have not gone to Isengard in the first place, trusting his two Rings to keep the Hobbits safe at least until they got to Rivendale.
 
  • Pondering
Reactions: Ent
he could have, perhaps, done something like withstood Saurman at Isengard or even have not gone to Isengard in the first place
There is a great deal tied up in the original post here...again coming back to the foundation of Eru's creation.
The charge the Istari were given was to 'help the peoples of Middle-earth in their fight against evil.' Only Gandalf fulfilled that charge.

Gandalf was selected by Eru himself, to go and aid the peoples. The others were all selected by one of the Valar... and they all failed. There is great education in this..!

So the question becomes, is Eru 'enough' ??? Or do we need to enhance what Eru gave us for His purposes. (this goes into some very deep theology.)

Melkor was given 'a part in/of all the others' power' and was the mightiest of them... yet was not satisfied. He did not trust Eru's works or gifts to him.

Sauron sought the One Ring for control and domination, not satisfied with what Eru had given him.

The 3 rings of the Elves do not fit the category, because of the REASON they developed them. It was not for themselves, but to provide healing and preservation for/of Eru's creation.

Saruman dappled with ring-craft, not willing to accept Eru had given him all he needed to succeed in his charge without 'aid'... OR due to dark intents, to control and dominate more. Either way, his dabbling was not well received by Gandalf.

Gandalf knew if he needed more, it would have been, or yet be, given by Eru, as Eru would not give a charge he himself did not intend to be fulfilled. And of course, in the end, when Gandalf did need to take a very direct hand in the preservation of the quest of the Ring, (the Balrog), when he died in that part of his charge, he WAS given more, and sent back to fulfill the rest of Eru's plan for him.

Understanding the depths of Tolkien means getting a good hold on his theology. Without it, all we have is our own perspective from which to work... and for most of us, it's far short of the need.

Ring-craft implies control - I think. I don't believe Gandalf ever set out to control anyone else. He was bidden not to.
Just as a note:
The Elven rings were also for a certain kind of 'control'... healing, preservation, assistance in accomplishing Eru's theme.
There's nothing inherently wrong with 'control'. it's the 'what' and 'why', and 'how' of control that becomes the problem.

I think this is what you were referring to by your comment anyway... just wanted to clarify.
None of the rings as originally made were for an evil kind of 'control'. They were, however, except for the three, ultimately all corrupted.
 
He didn't have the knowledge/skill to make a Great Ring. Saruman, who studied ring lore extensively, couldn't duplicate one without some further lore that might only have been available in Mordor. The elven-smiths who forged the rings had to be instructed by Sauron himself before they had the skills to craft them.
Even if Gandalf had had the knowledge (and really, this was somewhat out of his ken and likely beyond his more limited abilities as one of the Istari) the fundamental charge of the Istari was to assist the Free Peoples, and not to seek dominion over them. It's clear Saruman's desire for the Ring, and for ring lore, was for just that; to set himself up as a Power.

I doubt even Saruman, at least embodied as one of the Istari, could have forged something as potent as a Ring of Power, let alone a Ruling Ring. Sadly, we know nothing of the nature of the ring he did apparently forge, but one would imagine that if it had been of great potency he might have been more successful. In the end, even wearing his own ring (whatever its attributes), he was unable to refuse the command of Gandalf the White, so I always get the feeling that Saruman's ring was more boast than anything else. I do not think Saruman, at least, had the stature or power, even with a more complete ring lore, to forge anything that could meaningfully compete with Sauron. At best all Saruman seemed to be able to do is turn Isengard into a "child's mockery" of Mordor.
 
Totally agree with everything @Ivan_M and @MightyMartian just said. The only one with true knowledge of the making of rings was either Sauron or one of the Noldo he instructed directly. Let's also not forget that Gandalf was given Narya by Cirdan when he arrived in Middle-Earth to assist in his efforts in kindling fire in the hearts of the Free Peoples.

He more so than any of the other Istari was devoted to his ordained cause, so he probably had no interest in other rings which would each serve their own purposes. With Nenya being designed to preserve life and keep the Elder Days alive within its sphere of influence (i.e. Lothlorien) and Vilya though the mightiest of the Three was designed to protect Rivendell and preserve knowledge, these wouldn't have had much use for Gandalf.
 

Today's events

Similar threads

Back
Top