• Welcome to The Tolkien Forum! Connect with fellow Tolkien enthusiasts and join a community that is over two decades old, and still going strong. We look forward to meeting you.  Register

Would Gollum have sailed from the Grey Havens had he survived?

So your answer would have been the same..?
Yes, it would still be 'no.' Neither Isildur nor Deagol 'earned' any special dispensation. (See #6 below.)

1. Both only possessed the ring for a very short time.
2. Both gave in to its 'power for possession' immediately.
3. Neither ever "willingly" gave it up.
4. Neither ever fought to do 'good' for the 'good' of Middle-earth and others.
5. Neither had a 'natural right' to cross over, both being of the race of man.
6. The reason 'special dispensation' would be given is not "that" anyone possessed the ring for a time. It's about who they are (character) and what they did with and about it (character worked out in action). It doesn't have to do with the ring. It has to do with the person. (Bilbo, Sam and Frodo particularly.)

As to #3 coupled with #6, it could be said that Frodo also never "willingly" gave it up so why did he get to go? He succumbed to its evil in the end.

Well... his dispensation came from his long battle, endurance, and work on behalf of Middle-earth in spite of his final failure. And his willingness to undertake such an impossible task, almost surely one ending in death, on their behalf to begin with.

Compare it to the dispensation Galadriel herself was ultimately given to cross over, and why, though she had previously been banned. And she too resisted the lure of the ring and refused it willingly when freely offered - a test greater than we may realize.

That's all I've got on this one... and the reasons for my conclusion.
(Oh all right I confess... I could say more, but I won't.)😇
 
Last edited:
I would say pity cannot be earned. Pity can only be given once something that is wrong is performed.

I don't think you could give pity if someone did nothing wrong or had no problems. Pity is given as a sympathy offering against harsh justice. It is mercy, essentially.
 
It was not a 'burden' to him in the same way as it was to Frodo and Bilbo.
Well, technically speaking, the Ring was not so much a burden for Bilbo. For the most time, he used it rather "selfishly", for lack of better word - first for his own adventurous exploits and later for other advantages (disappering from relatives etc.). He loved the Ring quite voluntarily. Up until the very end when he was encouraged by Gandalf to pass the Ring to Frodo, he didn't really try to resist the fondness for his precious, for he thought it is just a useful magical trinket, not a creation of super-evil tyrant.
 
Well, technically speaking, the Ring was not so much a burden for Bilbo. For the most time, he used it rather "selfishly", for lack of better word - first for his own adventurous exploits and later for other advantages (disappering from relatives etc.). He loved the Ring quite voluntarily. Up until the very end when he was encouraged by Gandalf to pass the Ring to Frodo, he didn't really try to resist the fondness for his precious, for he thought it is just a useful magical trinket, not a creation of super-evil tyrant.
Interesting. I'm going to ponder on this a bit, and pursue a couple little side-channels this brings into my mind as well.
Thanks much.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top