Rivendell_librarian
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 770

Why are things so heavy in Mordor? Is there a problem with Middle Earth's gravitational pull?
Supernatural help/intervention, which, we know, was always in the picture.As to the One Ring's "weight" consider these two passages.
RotK, Book Six, chapter III "Mount Doom" (p. 950-51 in my 2002 Hardback):
"As Frodo clung upon his back, arms loosely about his neck, legs clasped firmly under his arms, Sam staggered to his feet; and then to his amazement he felt the burden light. He had feared that he would have barely strength to lift his master alone, and beyond that he had expected to share in the dreadful dragging weight of the accursed Ring. But it was not so. Whether because Frodo was so worn by his long pains, wound of knife, and venomous sting, and sorrow, fear, and homeless wandering, or because some gift of final strength had been given to him, Sam lifted Frodo with no more difficulty thsn if he were carrying a hobbit-child pig-a-back in some romp on the lawns of hayfields of the Shire."
TT, Book Four, chapter X "The Choices of Master Samwise" (p 740):
"And then he bent his own neck and put the chain upon it, and at once his head was bowed to the ground with the weight of the Ring, as if a great stone had been strung on him. But slowly, as if the weight became less, or a new strength grew in him, he raised his head, and then with a great effort got to his feet and found that he could walk and bear his burden."
Note that Sam felt no such burden while he held the chain an Ring in his hands, only after he had put the chain around his neck.
And when he pick up Frodo later on in the quest, he is not wearing the Ring, and does not feel the Ring's weight that he had experienced earlier at Cirith Ungol and expected to feel again. What are we to make of this?
P.S. And in both quotes, JRRT confronts us with two of the countless infuriating "either - or" non-explanations he strewed through the book ... without which JRRT forums, is my estimate, would be approximately 1% as large as they in fact are. 😁
You're saying that in all of those infuriating occurrences of "either - or", where one of the alternatives is a natural explanation, JRRT actually means the other, indicating that Eru is constantly meddling in Middle-earth affairs like a nosy sitcom mother-in-law?Supernatural help/intervention, which, we know, was always in the picture.
No, but I AM saying that they had supernatural help, and not only a few times. .You're saying that in all of those infuriating occurrences of "either - or", where one of the alternatives is a natural explanation, JRRT actually means the other, indicating that Eru is constantly meddling in Middle-earth affairs like a nosy sitcom mother-in-law?
Not in the least with his "either - or" occurrences. Perhaps that was one aspect of JRRT's genius as a writer.Tolkien being a Christian had no problem with supernatural intervention, and so he's written it into his mythology.
He had no difficulty with it in his everyday life (viz. his Catholic faith observances) and thought it completely and perfectly normal., so there is no reason to think he would leave it out his mythology.
[Philosophical] materialists, I daresay, have not a little difficulty with it.
Agreed, but in the examples I've provided (and in the others I have not) he has implied an "interference" by something or someone that is clearly not natural.Not in the least with his "either - or" occurrences. Perhaps that was one aspect of JRRT's genius as a writer.
I'm sure you've noticed that JRRT remained non-committal in all of these cases. He himself and others of like mind, I'll call them philosophical supernaturalists, may have had no problem with supernatural intervention, but JRRT does not come down heavy-handedly on this side. A point of criticism he had for the Arthurian legends, and possibly implicitly for some of C.S. Lewis's fiction writing.
Philosophical materialists have no problem, I would propose, in waving off the supernatural intervention side of the "either - or" with a "Bah, humbug!", and choosing the natural explanation. There are undoubtedly millions of such people among JRRT's fans, some of whom might be put off by C.S. Lewis's heavy-handed dogmatism (Lewis was well aware of this character trait of himself), at least in comparison to JRRT's writing.
I see this as a beautiful example of the 'either, or' passages you mention.Whether because Frodo was so worn by his long pains, wound of knife, and venomous sting, and sorrow, fear, and homeless wandering, or because some gift of final strength had been given to him, Sam lifted Frodo with no more difficulty thsn if he were carrying a hobbit-child pig-a-back in some romp on the lawns of hayfields of the Shire."
I'm not sure I'd agree that the destruction of the ring was ever in doubt. I think that apart from being a superbly written work of literature, the book is also a real page-turner as regards the suspense of the outcome.Supernatural help/intervention, which, we know, was always in the picture.
Frodo was meant to have the RIng, obviously, to destroy it. He and Sam were going to get whatever help was needed to do that.
Note, there was no guarantee that the quest wouldn't kill them, but that the Ring was going to be destroyed was never in doubt.
Our fears (as readers/observers) and attendant gut wrenching suspense was for Frodo and Sam's lives, and the alteration of ME, how much would be lost due to the Ring's destruction.
You're allowed to disagree. 😉I'm not sure I'd agree that the destruction of the ring was ever in doubt. I think that apart from being a superbly written work of literature, the book is also a real page-turner as regards the suspense of the outcome.
And let's not forget that the ring almost wasn't destroyed at the end !
Very well put DeimosYou're allowed to disagree. 😉
Very often a discussion ends with "let us agree to disagree".